• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is not the satisfacted answer.
The synonym of "Great Britain" is "Great Union".
The root of the word "Britain" is the word from Torah "Brit" - Union.

The root of the word Britain is not from the Torah - the more likely source is a Greek corruption of the Celtic/Welsh "Priteni" used to describe the inhabitants of the islands they called "Prydain".
 
Indeed. But you know this will fall on deaf ears.

I know - every once in a while though I have this urge to engage in a futile effort to battle a foe that cannot be defeated (ie, the appalling ingnorance that NatCo displays in the fields of biology, sociology, history, linguistics, etc.). It's the Celt in me.
 
I know - every once in a while though I have this urge to engage in a futile effort to battle a foe that cannot be defeated (ie, the appalling ingnorance that NatCo displays in the fields of biology, sociology, history, linguistics, etc.). It's the Celt in me.


Yes. It's a bad habit but one which, unfortunately, I share.

Good things can emerge from nonsense though. When believable info is presented to me I'm reminded to attempt to learn about things I'd forgotten to over the years.

OT: Point in case being your reference to the origins of the word "Britain".
I should try to learn more about such things.

Ah well, every dirty puddle can reflect rainbows.
ETA: And Cosmo has a filter to prove it :)
 
Last edited:
It makes no difference since in a world of seven billion people you're the only one pushing this idea. Neither union nor empire will happen.

My Great Union includes all developed countries: EU, US, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Israel, Singapore and all correctly developing countries: Russian, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkish, Mexico, Brazilian, Argentina, Chilly, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Thailand and may be some others.
In the first step for about first 10 years only developed countries will be the members of Great Union "NEW 7th DAY".
Than step by step the correctly developing countries will become the equal members of this Great Union.
 
Let us presume that we are young fellows and friends
And we tell each other about our girl friends and about our love relationships with them.
And you tell me that you don't believe in my words about my love to my girl friend.
I am not sure that after those words I will carry my friendship with you.

I'm sure it would take me many many second, perhaps even 10 to get over the loss.
 
Why? Checking to see if you are correct is a bit like checking to see if rotten meat is still rotten.


I feel it relevant to remind folks that Cosmo's other thread, (which for some reason is still in the Business/Economics section) is titled "blah blah, how to make money from it". This suggests to me that he wanted to make money by telling people to starve themselves to death after pigging out on raw chicken.

Recurring themes:
Vodka
Wanting money
Magic bumhole distillery.
Robot judges.

There are more but are too silly to mention.
 
Last edited:
My Great Union includes all developed countries: EU, US, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Israel, Singapore and all correctly developing countries: Russian, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkish, Mexico, Brazilian, Argentina, Chilly, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Thailand and may be some others.
In the first step for about first 10 years only developed countries will be the members of Great Union "NEW 7th DAY".
Than step by step the correctly developing countries will become the equal members of this Great Union.

Yes but you're the only person pushing the idea and it's going nowhere. You have no supporters. No legislative bodies are debating your ideas. No grassroots organizations are rallying to your cause. This idea is just dead. I wont even say dead on arrival since it never went anywhere.
 
It is not the satisfacted answer.
The synonym of "Great Britain" is "Great Union".
The root of the word "Britain" is the word from Torah "Brit" - Union.
No, it is not. Britannia stems from the Greek, and refers to the fact that the core of Britain is insular. It's really really easy to look up. Greek is not rooted in Hebrew. In any case, the first written instance of the root word in Greek predates the writing of the Torah by about 2500 years.
 
My Great Union includes all developed countries: EU, US, Canada, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Israel, Singapore and all correctly developing countries: Russian, Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkish, Mexico, Brazilian, Argentina, Chilly, India, Malaysia, Indonesia, China, Vietnam, Thailand and may be some others.
In the first step for about first 10 years only developed countries will be the members of Great Union "NEW 7th DAY".
Than step by step the correctly developing countries will become the equal members of this Great Union.

Oh good, I can move to Iceland. I'll have a fort of tin foil to thwart the robots, dart firing cannons to pop the blimp temples and the only food available will be meat and fruit this way cosmos anemic army can't occupy us.
 
It is not the satisfacted answer.
The synonym of "Great Britain" is "Great Union".
The root of the word "Britain" is the word from Torah "Brit" -
It is not the satisfacted answer.
The synonym of "Great Britain" is "Great Union".
The root of the word "Britain" is the word from Torah "Brit" - Union.
How often do you have to be told - as I have done before - that this is utter rubbish. Wiki.

The modern Welsh name for the island is (Ynys) Prydain. This demonstrates that the original Common Brittonic form had initial P- not B- (which would give **Brydain) and -t- not -tt- (else **Prythain). This is best explained as containing a stem *pritu- (Welsh pryd, Old Irish cruith; < Proto-Celtic *kwritu-), meaning "shape, form", combined with an adjectival suffix. This leaves us with *Pritania

It has been speculated that the name of the island probably derives from the demonym of its inhabitants, which would be *Pritanī, singular *Pritanos, modelled on Latin Britannus, -i. It is further popularly supposed that this demonym may refer to some practice of body art or tattooing.​

It has nothing to do with the Hebrew word for "Union". The Celtic or pre-Celtic languages from which "Britsin" is derived do not belong to the Semitic family, but are quite different language groups. So what you are stating is completely nonsensical. In the nineteenth century there was a sect of insane people - the British Israelites - who used to propose nonsensical etymologies like yours. A few of them still exist. They resemble you in many ways, having fantasies about combining the British Empire with a resurrected Israel, as you wish to do with the US Empire in your New Saturday Great Union. According to wiki, these lunatics

... claim numerous links in historical linguistics between ancient Hebrew and various European place names and languages. As an example; proponents claim that “British” is derived from the Hebrew words “Berit” and “Ish”, and should therefore be understood as “Covenant Man”. These words have other roots and this interpretation of the Hebrew is incorrect. Another example is Rhys' assertion of equivalence between Cymry (the native Welsh name for the British) and Cimmerian, which is at odds with the generally accepted derivation of Cymry from an earlier Celtic form *kom-broges (lit. "with-land"), meaning "people of the same country", or compatriot; only the modern form of the word looks similar. Yet another example is the alleged connection between the Irish 'Tuatha Dé Danann' and the Tribe of Dan. Secular sources indicate that the true root of this phrase is the 'People of the Goddess Danu'.​

Your interpretation of "Britain" is an absurd fantasy. Please remove it from your mind at once.
 
If Hebrew is the language of God, why did He reveal the Qur'an in Arabic?
Exactly.
Learning Arabic is emphasized in many Muslim schools for this reason.
Anyway, Abraham came from Ur, the Bible says. And naturally, in Ur they were not speaking Hebrew. Thus, the "original language" God chose to speak with to Adam and Eve was not Hebrew.

Ur is considered by many to be the city of Ur Kasdim mentioned in the Book of Genesis (Biblical Hebrew אוּר) as the birthplace of the Hebrew patriarch Abram (Abraham; Aramaic: Oraham, Arabic: Ibrahim), traditionally believed to be some time in the 2nd millennium BC.
~Wikipedia's entry on "Ur"

Or am I wrong, and Hebrew was the language of Sumeria?
 
If Hebrew is the language of God, why did He reveal the Qur'an in Arabic?
Surely, being Omniscient, he is able to understand more than one language. Anyway, he sent his angel Gabe to reveal the Quran to Muhammand. Maybe God taught Gabe Arabic for this purpose.
 
And..... We wait another week whilst Cosmo enjoys his wonderful life for the next 6 days.
AKA: lying in his bed starving whilst pretending he's not obsessed with vodka.
 
Are you Mel Brooks?

My Flying Temple "NEW SATURDAY" has much more power.
But it is the power of great authority of my Global Social Project.
My Flying Temple consists from 4 equilateral triangular pyramids и and symbolizes the kosher compatibility without mixing of all 4 World Cultures in the secular format.
 
Genghis was a psychopathic monster and his empire was a gross tyranny.

To people like you even Reagan is "a psychopathic monster and his empire was a gross tyranny" because he was homophobic.
The clever man will not measure the ethical scales of 13 - 14 centuries by ethical scales of high developed countries of 21 century.

The word "Britain" doesn't mean Union or Alliance. The modern Hebrew word "Brit" may be a translation of "United" in "United Kingdom" That doesn't mean that the ancient word "Britain" means "union" or is derived from a Hebrew root. It isn't.

You can't understand this because you know only English and don't know so incorrectly called Hebrew - Holy Resurrected Language of God and Judea Citizens till the 7 century BC.
Ask somebody who know English and Holy Resurrected Language of Holy Resurrected Israel.

But nonsense like that was spouted by the lunatics called "British Israelites".

ETA per wiki.
It has been speculated that the name of the island probably derives from the demonym of its inhabitants, which would be *Pritanī, singular *Pritanos, modelled on Latin Britannus, -i. It is further popularly supposed that this demonym may refer to some practice of body art or tattooing. Such a practice, however, is only dubiously attested and in any case not until at least the time of Caesar, two hundred and fifty years after Pytheas first documents the name. The interpretation therefore remains uncertain.​

Do "British Israelites" know our Holy Resurrected Language?
Do you know the Ancient Holy Language, Welsh?
There is only one Holy Language of God.
It is the language of Torah.
 
To people like you even Reagan is "a psychopathic monster and his empire was a gross tyranny" because he was homophobic.
The clever man will not measure the ethical scales of 13 - 14 centuries by ethical scales of high developed countries of 21 century.
The clever man will not exhume the deceased Mongolian Empire, declare it to be "correctly developing", baptise it New Saturday Great Union and set up a state based on its principles.
Do "British Israelites" know our Holy Resurrected Language?

There is only one Holy Language of God.
It is the language of Torah.
The Torah doesn't refer to "Britain". If you want to understand that word you need to know not ancient Hebrew, but ancient Welsh and Gaelic. Did God not understand these languages in ancient times?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom