• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:)
Well, that's surprising.
It actually exists. Even though it looks a bit like something made of paper, I hadn't expected that.

The real existing of me and my New Sabbath Kippah are not so surprising.
Surprising for me that most participants of this thread do not believe that I from beginning of October 2014 live in "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle".
In this situation I intent to prove to those people that they really can live in my lifestyle too and be healthy and happy.
 
Are you really confirm that keep for sure your professional skills you need to work not less than 1700 working hours a year in your current work place?
Yes or no.

In order to keep my skills up to date and perform the work that I am required to I need to work 1700 hours (fourth time)
 
To make the statistical asking I have asked all you - How many hours of your current work in a year is enough to keep for sure your current professional level?
Unfortunately I did not get the answers.
My point of view that 300 - 400 hours of their current work in a year is enough to the most of employees for this.
I suspect that asking on a forum is not the best way of getting the data required.
Equally, different jobs will require different amounts of time to keep up to date. A construction labourer for example will take considerably less time than a software developer working for a leading software producer.
So even if you had many replies (I would suspect you would need 100's of replies to make it valid), you would also need to know (as a minimum) what job it was they did, rather than making unfounded generalisations.
 
Look this video with the Flying Temple of New Saturday.
And the same you see up my hat.
May something you will feel after that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt52nMrPOME

I feel that it looks like something a four year old child has made on a 486.
---

In this situation I intent to prove to those people that they really can live in my lifestyle too and be healthy and happy.
You are deluded if you think this "lifestyle" is either a healthy or happy one.
You expect people to poison themselves eating raw meat and poultry, be sentenced by robot judges, work one year out of two and wear silly hats.
You'll be asking us to go stand on street corners and parrot your gibberish at the laughing passers-by next.
 
Last edited:
Odd, you are the only believer in a god I've ever heard mention this and I've met a lot of god botherers.

Because it is my great invention - weekly-fold calendar with 28 years cycle that equals to the 28 years sun cycle.
According this calendar you will celebrate your birthday in this day of week in which you really have born.
And the same about all historical events.
My calendar enhances the feeling of authenticity of the event.
 
In order to keep my skills up to date and perform the work that I am required to I need to work 1700 hours (fourth time)

"To keep skills up to the date" - it is one task.
"To perform the required work" - it is another task.
Why you persistently try to mix those 2 different tasks?
How many hours minimum you need to work in a year to implement only your first task and not the second one?
 
I suspect that asking on a forum is not the best way of getting the data required.
Equally, different jobs will require different amounts of time to keep up to date. A construction labourer for example will take considerably less time than a software developer working for a leading software producer.
So even if you had many replies (I would suspect you would need 100's of replies to make it valid), you would also need to know (as a minimum) what job it was they did, rather than making unfounded generalisations.

Let us call "unfounded generalisations" "hypothesises".
1 Only employees of different professions and different skills that have an hour wage and earn according their working hours are interesting me.
2 It is clear that the higher skill of time working employees the more hours of work in a year he need to to keep his skills up to date.
3 It is clear that in the most cases the quantity of those working hours in a year is much less than the average quantity of working hours in a year.

My hypothesis that for high skilled employees such as a software developer, designer, engineer, doctors, teachers 400 - 600 working hours in a year is enough to keep their skills up to date.
For skilled workers 300 - 400 working hours in a year is enough.
For unskilled workers 0 - 200 working hours in a year is enough.
Let us presume that the percentage of earning according their working time peaople from all employees is 80%.
To give those people the ideal life conditions we have to give them only those numbers of working hours in a year but with the same real earning they have now.
My Global Social Project "New Saturday" gives this ability.
 
I feel that it looks like something a four year old child has made on a 486.

Excellent!
This is because my soul has become a pure and innocent as a soul of a child.
It explains why little children urgently try to take my kippah by their hands in the streets of Israel.
Brilliant video.


You are deluded if you think this "lifestyle" is either a healthy or happy one.
You expect people to poison themselves eating raw meat and poultry, be sentenced by robot judges, work one year out of two and wear silly hats.
You'll be asking us to go stand on street corners and parrot your gibberish at the laughing passers-by next.

Most people want to their children:1 26 weeks of creative vacation in a year.
2 To live not in society of total corruption were only criminals in every brunch and level of state power but in society with zero corruption.
3 To have high lifelong multi professional 4 world cultures in secular form education and real hour wage every year increasing not less then 3%.
4 To be the equal citizen of Great Global Union of all Developed and Correctly Developing countries.

In this world are dominated the laws of probability of increasing chaos of stock exchanges.
In my world will dominated the laws of well ruling social probability as alternative of todays not ruling social chaos.
 
"To keep skills up to the date" - it is one task.
"To perform the required work" - it is another task.
Why you persistently try to mix those 2 different tasks?
How many hours minimum you need to work in a year to implement only your first task and not the second one?

OK - I'm a database developer / administrator. I need to work around 1200 hours a year to maintain / develop the systems I work with. From your post here http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=10657427#post10657427 I should have 3-400 hours to keep my skills up to date. This brings me back to an annual figure of 1700 hours. Oddly enough - this is the approximate number of hours I work.
 
Last edited:
:)
Well, that's surprising.
It actually exists. Even though it looks a bit like something made of paper, I hadn't expected that.

My good luck hat ... Given to me by a CIA guy as we went in for a special mission in Cambodia. I have the hat to this day
--John Kerry
 
If Hebrew is the language of God, why did He reveal the Qur'an in Arabic?

And if you are spelling it God, not G-d, then presumably you accept Christianity (although that's not certain), so why did the Logos choose to use the Greek translation of Hebrew, the LXX?

Anyway, modern Hebrew is different than ancient Hebrew, although they are closely related. The grammar, pronunciation, and vocabulary differs in major ways. Modern Hebrew has Germanic, Aramaic, Yiddish, and even some Arabic influences.
 
And if you are spelling it God, not G-d, then presumably you accept Christianity (although that's not certain), so why did the Logos choose to use the Greek translation of Hebrew, the LXX?
The Logos was so enamoured of LXX that It even replicated errors in that translation.
 
The Logos was so enamoured of LXX that It even replicated errors in that translation.

Your statement cannot be shown to be true because you don't know how the Logos should have been translated in the LXX.

Please identify your supposed replicated errors.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom