Lord Language Resurrection.

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Yet another hand waving away of adverse facts without actually addressing the shortcomings of your project.

There is only one shortcoming in my project.
It is the fact that I have no very very little sum of money -$ 100000000 to implement it globally.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Let's replace the word "project" with the words "insane ramblings".
Whilst doing so feel free to wear a jaunty hat and use whichever language you prefer.
Oh, and don't forget to stand on a street corner yelling at strangers.

I speak with people mostly in dialogue and polyalogue format.
9 from 10 persons understand me very well because all blocks and 13 - 15 other points look very easy for understanding.

I prefer to speak with people that are angry in the first step of my speaking and agree with some points in the end of discussion.

I don't yell in the streets of course.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Older English translations of the 2 Kings occurrences refer to the Jews' language, while modern ones say Hebrew.

The fact that the translator of Holy Book very easy replaces the word "Hebrew" by "the Jews’ language" proves that 2 those translations are wrong.
Look at the correct translation please from Holy Resurrected Language that all God believers will natively know I hope that soon.

2 Kings 18:26, 28
[NIV 20th Century] 26 Then Eliakim son of Hilkiah, and Shebna and Joah said to the field commander, “Please speak to your servants in Aramaic, since we understand it. Don’t speak to us in Judahit (the language of Judea Citizens - the tribe of Judah in 8 centuary BC.) in the hearing of the people on the wall.” ... 28 Then the commander stood and called out in Judahit (the language of Judea Citizens - the tribe of Judah in 8 centuary BC.) , “Hear the word of the great king, the king of Assyria!
[AV 17th Century] 26 Then said Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, and Shebna, and Joah, unto Rab-shakeh, Speak, I pray thee, to thy servants in the Syrian language; for we understand it: and talk not with us in the Judahit (the language of Judea Citizens - the tribe of Judah in 8 centuary BC.) in the ears of the people that are on the wall ... 28 Then Rab-shakeh stood and cried with a loud voice in the Judahit (the language of Judea Citizens - the tribe of Judah in 8 centuary BC.) , and spake, saying, Hear the word of the great king, the king of Assyria.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

I'm assuming Palestinians are just as good as smiling nodding and backing away from the unhinged as the rest of us.

You think so because you imagine yourself on my place.
In that case it will be exactly so as you imagine.

For example.
In my town Dimona I can't go in Friday without my Hat (The Kipa of New Sabbath) because everyone knows that in Friday will be my shot lecture in the center of the town.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

I guess I'm doing the impossible then.

I don't drink

I don't do drugs

I don't smoke

I exercise fairly regularly

I cannot think of anything I do that would, in anyway, match the definition of addiction. Perhaps you have addictions you can't get past but that doesn't mean the rest of the world does.

ETA:

I need to come clean, There is one thing I'm addicted to, In fact I feel like I cannot live without it or I'd die, I need it daily, Multiple times a day.

If I do your plan will it free me from this one thing I'm addicted to?

Let us presume that you are not mono lifestyle person but you are multi lifestyles person.
And you have good experience to live in every of the set of your lifestyles.
Let us presume that you are a free person and have ability to live every week in one of your lifestyles.
You can make the order how you change your lifestyle every week.
In this case you will addict by constant cycle of all set of your lifestyles.
But if you will choose every week long lifestyle according lottery you will not have the constant cycle of them and in this case you will not addict to the cycle.

It is what I really give to the people in my project.
Use creatively the random samples in your lifestyles projects and be free and happy.

 

[fagin]

You think so because you imagine yourself on my place.
In that case it will be exactly so as you imagine.

For example.
In my town Dimona I can't go in Friday without my Hat (The Kipa of New Sabbath) because everyone knows that in Friday will be my shot lecture in the center of the town.

No idea what a shot lecture is, but I'm sure they just enjoy a good laugh.

 

[Border Reiver]

I mean a random sample of 7 professional experts that will be chosen from set of 100 or more experts from definite professional area.
May be it will be enough 5 experts.I do not know exactly.

If you spent any time working as an engineer then you have had at least one statistics class - and would know that a sample size of 7, out of a definitely much greater population, does not lead to accurate sampling.

For example we in this Forum have the open anonymous communication.
If we will communicate by skype for example we will depend from each other much more and it will be a big barrier for decision making procedures.
I have designed all those procedures but it is too long to explain all of them here.
About justice.
If the judge, and jury, and lawyers, and prosecution will communicate as we communicate in this Forum it will be much more objectivity and quality of decision.

Because people on the internet have always been objective and capable of quality decisions....Especially when there are no consequences due to the anonymous nature of the event - only the accused is known. Sounds like you are a big fan of secret courts and Star Chambers. A person has the right to face their accuser.

If you have these ideas and procedures, make pdf article of it and post a link to it.

I am not the algorithmic maker but I gave this my idea to professor who knows 5 programmatic languages has insured me that it is absolutely implementable idea.
In nearest future it will be the base rule: If the project of definite law can't be using in judge-robot program it is not a law.
In modern science if you speak about something without mathematical good working model - you are not a scientist.
The same situation have to be and can to be in judge decisions making processes.

Name, and faculty of said professor.

From there we can determine if the professor is actually an expert whose opinon can actually be accepted as an expert opinion.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

-Snipped for sanity-

A simple yes or no, I'll be #2 in the super plan but only if it will cure me of this addiction I have. Why even while I type this I'm doing it.

 

[Craig4]

You think so because you imagine yourself on my place.
In that case it will be exactly so as you imagine.

For example.
In my town Dimona I can't go in Friday without my Hat (The Kipa of New Sabbath) because everyone knows that in Friday will be my shot lecture in the center of the town.

Has anyone who listened to your "lecture" ever lifted a finger to help make your plan a reality?

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Your understanding of addiction and addictive behaviour is flawed. Doing something repetitively is not in itself equal to being addicted to that thing; addiction is far more complex and destructive than that.

We all breathe, eat and sleep repetitively (you claim to only eat every seventh day but that is still repetitively) but it would be foolish and incorrect to claim that people are addicted to breathing, eating or sleeping simply because we do them regularly and repetitively.

Addictive eating/addictive starvation (which is really the same thing, expressed in a different destructive behaviour) do exist, but they are nothing to do with the human body's physiological need for regular intake of nutrients. Addictive eating/starvation should be suspected if a person demonstrates some of the following - obsessions over food and body weight, having strange rules surrounding eating, eating in secret, deliberately vomiting after eating, excess use of laxatives, eating much more or much less than is needed for health, excessive eating when not hungry or deliberately resisting real hunger even though food is available, eating bad or spoiled foods, or eating non-food items - to name but a few indicators of disordered thought processes surrounding eating.

Your insistence that a normal healthy eating pattern of eating one or more times daily (according to physiological hunger cues) from a wide range of foods is "addictive behaviour" is not only completely wrong, it leads one to suspect that you may have some misunderstandings about human biology and possibly some addictive thoughts/behaviours around food and body weight.

The human body can cope with short periods of fasting but many of the nutrients on which the body depends must be eaten on a regular basis. The diet you claim to eat appears to be deficient in several vitamins and minerals which the body needs for optimum health; symptoms of deficiency can be slow to appear and may not become obvious until damage to the body is advanced. Taking a multivitamin/multimineral supplement may aid your health in the short term if you persist with your eating behaviour, but pills are not a substitute for a varied healthy diet.

Disclaimer - I am not a doctor or a psychologist. You should consult your doctor about your diet and your diet 'rules' to ensure that you are not doing permanent damage to your health.

Please!
Don't put all questions and don't mix them in one basket.
Why yoga hold breath and stop heart?
My hypothesis that they want to become free for some time even from those deep natural repetitive functions.
It is their philosophy goal to become free from every connection.

You are right that my "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" is the repetitive cycle process.
So according my hypothesis I am addicted from it.
What to do?
To take 7 cards with 7 days of week and choose every day one card according the random sample.
The theory of probability says that in 99% of cases I will eat in 7th, 8th and 6th, 9th and 5th, 10th and 4th days from the last day of my eating.
In this case I will not be "To eat only in the 7th Day lifestyle" addicted person.
It is example of replacing determination model by the model of probability.
There are much more freedom in the models of probability than in the models of determination.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

No idea what a shot lecture is, but I'm sure they just enjoy a good laugh.

It depends from my mood.
It usually takes 20 - 30 minutes on my lectures that similar the secular sermons.
I tell them in Holy Resurrected Language and than in Russian because in our town 30% of citizens are russian speaking persons.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

If you spent any time working as an engineer then you have had at least one statistics class - and would know that a sample size of 7, out of a definitely much greater population, does not lead to accurate sampling.

Imagine please that you are the moderator of expertise process.
Let us presume that you have 5 authors of 5 project on 1 topic that are in competition.
You have to choose the best of them using professional experts.
Presume that you have 50 experts on this topic.
But 5 experts is enough for this work.
I just want to say that you shouldn't choose them according your intuition.
You have to choose 5 of 50 according lottery - the random sample.

Because people on the internet have always been objective and capable of quality decisions....Especially when there are no consequences due to the anonymous nature of the event - only the accused is known. Sounds like you are a big fan of secret courts and Star Chambers. A person has the right to face their accuser.

If you have these ideas and procedures, make pdf article of it and post a link to it.

Only the lawyer and his client should have the possibility of verbal and visual communication.
All other participants of the judicial process needs to communicate with each other anonymously by printing as we do in our forum.
They should not know the names of each other.
In this case the visual and verbal hypnosis on each other from all participants of process will be zero.
The level of formalisation and quality of decisions will be much higher.
The judge - anonymous should not be on his place all his life because he afraid to be punished.
The jury of anonymous persons will not afraid to be punished too.
The jury members will not influence on each other because they will not be for many days in one common room.
They will be at their homes and will communicate with each other anonymously.

Name, and faculty of said professor.

From there we can determine if the professor is actually an expert whose opinon can actually be accepted as an expert opinion.

Without the impulse of believing to each other our conversation will not be creatively constructive.
If it is possible to play chess better than world champion, if it is possible to play on the stock exchange better than professional stock broker it is surely possible to make judge decisions better than professional judge.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

A simple yes or no, I'll be #2 in the super plan but only if it will cure me of this addiction I have. Why even while I type this I'm doing it.

May be another example will help you to understand that the method of random samples gives much more justice than the method of so called honest competition.
It was the time of the noble knights tournaments.
The knights saved their incognito by masks.
In this way vassal could fight on tournament with his suveren and even the king could take part in the knights tournament anonymously.
Than the instrument of saving justice was the ability of duels between nobles independently from their hierarchy.
The rightful person was not who was really right but who was better in fencing and later in the pistol shooting.
So to be right you had to spend much time in fencing and later in the pistol shooting trainings.
It were Russian nobles that have invited the so called "The Russian roulette".

Duelists put in the revolver only one cartridge from seven and have shot theirself in the heads.
Thus each could be killed with a probability of 14.3%.
It was the great social invention because to prove that you're not a coward - there was no need to spend many hours training in shooting and fehtovanie.
So the equality of the probability of being killed has provided much higher level of fairness with the help of really honest duel.

In my social project I use the models of probability to build the society of reall justice too but in the level of 21 ctntuary.

 

[Craig B]

May be another example will help you to understand that the method of random samples gives much more justice than the method of so called honest competition.
It was the time of the noble knights tournaments.
The knights saved their incognito by masks.
In this way vassal could fight on tournament with his suveren and even the king could take part in the knights tournament anonymously.
Than the instrument of saving justice was the ability of duels between nobles independently from their hierarchy.
The rightful person was not who was really right but who was better in fencing and later in the pistol shooting.
So to be right you had to spend much time in fencing and later in the pistol shooting trainings.
It were Russian nobles that have invited the so called "The Russian roulette".

Duelists put in the revolver only one cartridge from seven and have shot theirself in the heads.
Thus each could be killed with a probability of 14.3%.
It was the great social invention because to prove that you're not a coward - there was no need to spend many hours training in shooting and fehtovanie.
So the equality of the probability of being killed has provided much higher level of fairness with the help of really honest duel.

In my social project I use the models of probability to build the society of reall justice too but in the level of 21 ctntuary.

So we have legislators chosen by random sortition, wearing masks to protect their anonymity, bashing one another with maces and shooting themselves with revolvers. (I suggest using the American five chamber, rather than the Russian seven chamber revolver, by the way.)

But in general I don't really approve of your plan of governance of your mad dystopia.

 

[Nationalcosmopolitan]

Has anyone who listened to your "lecture" ever lifted a finger to help make your plan a reality?

I have the experience of private lifestyle from 1982.
It was the time when the chairman of KGB in the past Andropov was the ruler of the USSR.
My friends - the directors of the design Bureaus gave me sometimes the ability to make some projects in their enterprises.
Only one condition was from their side.
Not to speak with the staff about my social ideas.
Why?
Because they knew the huge level of my influence on the people.
In USSR we were ruled by murderers, thieves and robbers.
In the Western Free World we are governed by thieves and crooks.
It is the less disgusting world than was USSR but it is still disgusting world.
I know how to replace it by my very attractive world of New Saturday.

 

[Nay_Sayer]

So that's a no then cosmo? My addiction remains. I was ready to wear he silly hat and fast too, pity, You lost a customer in me.

 

[Craig4]

I have the experience of private lifestyle from 1982.
It was the time when the chairman of KGB in the past Andropov was the ruler of the USSR.
My friends - the directors of the design Bureaus gave me sometimes the ability to make some projects in their enterprises.
Only one condition was from their side.
Not to speak with the staff about my social ideas.
Why?
Because they knew the huge level of my influence on the people.
In USSR we were ruled by murderers, thieves and robbers.
In the Western Free World we are governed by thieves and crooks.
It is the less disgusting world than was USSR but it is still disgusting world.
I know how to replace it by my very attractive world of New Saturday.

So that means, no, no one who hears your lectures lifts a finger to make your project happen. This is as it should be. This will be hard for you to accept but it's probably true. You aren't being opposed, you're being ignored. No one is working against you because no one is working for you.

 

[Joey McGee]

I cannot think of anything I do that would, in anyway, match the definition of addiction.

Well reading and posting in this forum can't be good for anyone's health, long-term, and the damage to the mind is quite clear, look around!

 

[Nay_Sayer]

Well reading and posting in this forum can't be good for anyone's health, long-term, and the damage to the mind is quite clear, look around!

Turns out I do have an addiction, I do it multiple times a day and i was even willing to join cosmos plan provided he could assure that I'd be cured.




Hint You have the addiction too

 

[Parsman]

I don't have any addictions. I'm also fairly positive starving is not the cure for addictions.

Actually, if you starve enough, it will cure pretty much everything you have, addictions and all, apart from DEATH