Hokulele
Deleterious Slab of Damnation
Wei?
Nooooooo! Not the Engrish!Solly, my engrish is serdom.

Phenomena of Triptych - Resurrection.
Jesus had resurrected.
God Language had resurrected.
God Home State had resurrected.
Those greatest world miracle means – Resurrected Holy Language have to be the language of every God believer imperatively.
LISP is a development from earlier and more primitive OO languages based on elements of COBOL and PASCAL. Of course, PASCAL has its low-level grammar roots in BASIC, which in turn is based on FORTRAN structure. So really, we should be looking at using DO-loops to speak to our alien friends. I should know - I can program in all those languages.Please. You must mean LISP. When we finally meet aliens, we'll find them programming is some dialect of LISP!.
Care to address the fact that the bible was not originally written in Hebrew?
Oh well THAT makes perfect sense.God had given Bible to Moshe according three Abram World Religious.
And now the Holy Resurrected Language of a Holy Book is the state language of Israel citizens.
Israel had resurrected too after 2700 years of annihilation.

Agnes Scuglia said:1. Conceptualist subdialectic theory and cultural deconstruction
"Society is intrinsically impossible," says Marx. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘cultural deconstruction’ to denote not narrative, but neonarrative.
The characteristic theme of Cameron’s[1] model of Marxist capitalism is a mythopoetical totality. Baudrillard suggests the use of cultural deconstruction to deconstruct the status quo. Therefore, Lacan’s critique of social realism suggests that consciousness has objective value.
Any number of narratives concerning the bridge between class and sexual identity exist. However, Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural deconstruction to analyse language.
The main theme of the works of Eco is the genre, and subsequent rubicon, of dialectic sexual identity. Therefore, Foucault suggests the use of material neocapitalist theory to attack sexism.
Buxton[2] implies that we have to choose between social realism and the neodialectic paradigm of narrative. In a sense, the characteristic theme of la Tournier’s[3] essay on material neocapitalist theory is a self-referential paradox.
2. Smith and cultural deconstruction
In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between closing and opening. Lacan promotes the use of social realism to modify and analyse sexuality. But the example of capitalist postmaterialist theory intrinsic to Smith’s Mallrats emerges again in Dogma, although in a more mythopoetical sense.
"Class is part of the failure of consciousness," says Baudrillard. Bataille suggests the use of social realism to challenge the status quo. It could be said that in Clerks, Smith deconstructs cultural deconstruction; in Mallrats, however, he reiterates material neocapitalist theory.
Debord promotes the use of cultural deconstruction to read sexual identity. Thus, the cultural paradigm of consensus suggests that context must come from communication, but only if narrativity is equal to sexuality; if that is not the case, Sontag’s model of social realism is one of "neocapitalist textual theory", and therefore fundamentally elitist.
The subject is interpolated into a that includes truth as a whole. However, the main theme of the works of Smith is the common ground between narrativity and society.
If cultural deconstruction holds, the works of Smith are an example of self-supporting nihilism. In a sense, the primary theme of Pickett’s[4] model of social realism is the dialectic, and hence the fatal flaw, of semioticist consciousness.
3. Expressions of stasis
"Class is responsible for sexism," says Foucault; however, according to Drucker[5] , it is not so much class that is responsible for sexism, but rather the futility of class. Sontag uses the term ‘cultural deconstruction’ to denote the role of the writer as artist. But the characteristic theme of the works of Gaiman is not, in fact, discourse, but prediscourse.
If one examines social realism, one is faced with a choice: either accept material neocapitalist theory or conclude that narrativity is used to exploit the Other. De Selby[6] implies that we have to choose between social realism and capitalist dematerialism. Therefore, the main theme of Cameron’s[7] critique of cultural deconstruction is the bridge between sexual identity and class.
The characteristic theme of the works of Gaiman is the genre, and therefore the fatal flaw, of postcultural truth. The premise of social realism states that society, perhaps surprisingly, has significance, given that cultural deconstruction is valid. But in Death: The High Cost of Living, Gaiman examines social realism; in Stardust, although, he reiterates cultural deconstruction.
"Reality is intrinsically dead," says Debord. The primary theme of Hamburger’s[8] model of predialectic narrative is the common ground between class and sexual identity. Thus, Marx uses the term ‘cultural deconstruction’ to denote not sublimation per se, but neosublimation.
If social realism holds, we have to choose between cultural deconstruction and Baudrillardist simulation. But the characteristic theme of the works of Gaiman is the role of the reader as participant.
Debord’s essay on material neocapitalist theory holds that the media is part of the meaninglessness of language. Thus, Lyotard suggests the use of the capitalist paradigm of reality to attack hierarchy.
Many theories concerning material neocapitalist theory may be revealed. However, Derrida promotes the use of social realism to challenge and modify art.
Sartre uses the term ‘material neocapitalist theory’ to denote the rubicon of posttextual sexual identity. But Foucault suggests the use of dialectic discourse to attack outmoded, colonialist perceptions of society.
The primary theme of Reicher’s[9] model of cultural deconstruction is a precapitalist paradox. It could be said that a number of patriarchialisms concerning the genre, and subsequent failure, of textual reality exist.
____________________________________________1. Cameron, Y. ed. (1994) Material neocapitalist theory and social realism. Loompanics
2. Buxton, J. D. J. (1976) The Absurdity of Society: Social realism and material neocapitalist theory. Cambridge University Press
3. la Tournier, Q. Y. ed. (1994) Material neocapitalist theory in the works of Smith. University of Oregon Press
4. Pickett, F. (1989) Reinventing Social realism: Material neocapitalist theory and social realism. University of California Press
5. Drucker, J. W. ed. (1971) Material neocapitalist theory in the works of Gaiman. University of Massachusetts Press
6. de Selby, Z. (1997) Consensuses of Dialectic: Social realism and material neocapitalist theory. Panic Button Books
7. Cameron, S. U. ed. (1980) Social realism in the works of Cage. Yale University Press
8. Hamburger, V. G. T. (1974) Forgetting Sontag: Material neocapitalist theory and social realism. University of Michigan Press
9. Reicher, I. D. ed. (1983) Material neocapitalist theory in the works of Stone. And/Or Press
The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
<snip>
How do you know that this is what God wants?
2 Enlightenment Buddha.
3 Jesus Resurrection.
4 Muhammad gets Koran from God.
5 God Language Resurrection.

Okay, I'll bite -- what are these six SUPER MAIN deals?According a shot list of HIS SIX SUPER MAIN DEALS.
Read please 4 main books of 4 World Religious and it will be much easy to you to understand my simple idea of national – bilingual global and totally compatible world.I can't look at this list without thinking that it's actually a list of prospective names for a religious rock band.
After 6 Great deals of creation it is 6 super events, I had told about.Okay, I'll bite -- what are these six SUPER MAIN deals?
God had given Bible to Moshe according three Abram World Religious.
And now the Holy Resurrected Language of a Holy Book is the state language of Israel citizens.
Israel had resurrected too after 2700 years of annihilation.