bob_kark
Person of Hench
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,488
So you admit there are conflicting reports? The molten pool indicated the metal melted at high temperature, so I think the steel did go over 600C but how can you prove it through observation on the steel without computer model? Oh right you cant cuz most of the steel has already been removed and shipped before anyone could obtain them for further evaluation. goshdurn it.
How many times do we need to disprove this?
What created the molten pool? It couldnt have possibly been caused by heat from the fuel cuz the tank of fuel in the plane has already went up in flames during the impact.
Answered on post 4039
Alright so the concrete didnt fly straight out of the building but it did get forced out further than the dust and fell in diagonal direction. How was that possible? Was it caused by the mass energy produced from the near free falling of the collapse? oh wait you said the building didnt fall at near free fall...could it have been caused by an explosion? oh wait Its impossible for the building to fall at near free fall speed without the help of explosives. Oh yeah maybe it could be both! that might be it.
Force = Mass * Acceleration. DIY math, take the mass of the top of the WTC and multiply it by its acceleration. It doesn't take a free fall speed to produce great force.