• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
chipmunk stew said:
Hitler and the Nazis are like pop culture icons by now, so people know exactly what they're getting at when the CTs draw comparisons with them. But I expect you'll get bragging rights before long for predicting it. I read a lot of "I bet you didn't know..." or "Most people have never even heard of..." coming from the CTs. They get off on possessing "arcane" knowledge, and the Nero connection is just the thing, once familiarity with the Reichstag fire becomes too common for their tastes.
Click to expand...

I do believe it was geggy who asked me if I knew that the Reichstag fire had been started by the Nazis. To which I answered: "Is there anyone who DOESN'T know ?"
 
CurtC said:
I'd like to remind all you neocons here that it's Friday afternoon, and your weekly reports are due at HQ by 5:00 EDT. Be sure to note which forums you've shilled in this week, along with any major accomplishments, and your plans for next week.

Also, some of you apparently didn't read the memo last week that you need to use the new coversheets on your reports. Please be sure to use only the new coversheets this week.

Also, next Friday will be Hawaiian shirt day.

So if you could all prepare your weekly reports with the new coversheets, that would be great...
Click to expand...

Where am I going to find a hawaiian shirt in Antartica? Whose idea was it to replace emporer penguins with adelie penguins anyway?
 
Did you know "neo-cons" is an anagram for "no scone"? Which sounds very close to "no soup"? As in "no soup for you"? Which was popularized by the TV show Seinfeld, which was based in...NEW YORK!!

Coincidence? I think not...
 
Belz... said:
I do believe it was geggy who asked me if I knew that the Reichstag fire had been started by the Nazis. To which I answered: "Is there anyone who DOESN'T know ?"
Click to expand...
Well, I didn't know, because I'd never looked into it. Reading Milesalpha's post has made me want to know more.
 
Stellafane said:
Did you know "neo-cons" is an anagram for "no scone"? Which sounds very close to "no soup"? As in "no soup for you"? Which was popularized by the TV show Seinfeld, which was based in...NEW YORK!!

Coincidence? I think not...
Click to expand...
The soup Nazis burned down the Reichstag?
 
Manny said:
The soup Nazis burned down the Reichstag?
Click to expand...
No, he's not advancing any theories, just pointing out coincidences and asking questions.

And dammit, I wanted to point out the full-circle linkage from Seinfeld back to Nazis!
 
Xraye said:
Damn, nothing escapes you guys. =oD
Ya, I should haven qualified the term *you*
Click to expand...
Fair 'nough :)

Just because it's been done before doesn't mean that it's fair or moral.
Click to expand...

And just because tribunals have been misused does not mean they are inheritly immoral or biased.

If being able to detain a prisoner secretly and being able to sentence him to death with just 2/3 votes without any process of appeal, I'd hate to see inhumane treatement.
Click to expand...

The lack of appeal does disturb me, it provides little chance for error correction. There is a sort of appeals process, however, in that the decision can be reviewed by the Secretary of Defense. Still not optimal, though.

Isn't gunna do them much good; all you need is hearsay as long as it has "probative value to a reasonable person" in order to convict the person, and you don't have to reveal any evidence.
Click to expand...

I disagree with this statement. I suspect the standards would be similar to what exist in traditional courts. The standards state only "Evidence that would have probative value to a reasonable person"; you adde dyour own interpretation to that to include heresay.

I do not know if it would include heresay or not, and you haven't shwon that it does, so this supports neither side of the argument until further information is gathered. Considering attorneys are posted for each side (the defendent can select their own or hire their own, as well), I would suspect it follows traditional court rules.

I think my deffinition of "fair" is different than the military's.
Click to expand...

Then it becomes a difference of opinion.

The tribunal system is very similar to the military justice system that has been in place for the U.S. Military for years. That system is, within reasonable expectation, fair. There is the difference that the military justice system provides avenue for appeal (although limited), however.

So, while I'm not saying this is necessarily a good thing, it's not immediate evidence of evil, either. Most people tend to mentally flip when they hear the word "tribunal", because of the negative connotations of the word, but a tribunal is just a specific type of judging body. How it's actually implemented is the measure of whether or not it is "fair".
 
Gravy said:
Feed the budgies.
Click to expand...

88864464f45bb6545.jpg


:D
 
Wait a second...how does that old saying go? A bird in the hand is worth two in the...AHA! AHA!! It all becomes clear now! "Feed the budgies" is in fact code for "Go inform my globalist masters about the latest Truth Movement developments!"

Ooooo, you no-scone people are SO devious...
 
i found this on the rules section of the loosers forum...

The First rule of CT club is you always talk about CT Club

The Second Rule of CT club is you always talk about CT club

The Third rule of CT club, if anyone shows you any evidence contrary to your beliefs you call them a sheep, a shill or a disinformation agent!

The Fourth rule of CT club, if anyone has any questions you immediately point them to every single CT movie ever made and tell them its the truth!

The Fifth rule of CT club, If anyone who is a skeptic starts to make headway in an argument you immediately ban them from the site to protect your sheep....err....idea's

The sixth rule of CT club, if this is your first night in CT club, you have to be certifiably nuts!
 
Hey... wait...
Ramooone you are right...
I've been on CT forums for a while now, asking questions... asking for edivence... and so on.. pointing out flaws... you know... logical things... and they do that...

Its annoying. Crappy videos based on nothing are not evidence...

And the number of them that spew things from loose change... and when you use counters (I think the main one was made on this site... I have to thank who...) they claim its disinformation, and call you part of it... and give you more crappy vids to watch.

I don't want to see thousands of people dying over and over. Its morbid. Its sick. Its screwed up.
 
More than that:

Terrorcell at Loose Change said:
...No wonder they are defending the Bush Administration, they even defend Hitler.
Click to expand...
I wasn't aware anyone was defending Bush in this thread, much less AH.

Is it too much to ask for a little intellectual honesty? No, that's not intended as a loaded or hypothetical question.

Terrorcell, should you be reading this, I think it would be nice if those who propose some sort of U.S. goverment involvement in the 9/11 attacks present proof. Not allegations, not questions, not indications of how-similar-things-happened-before-so-it's-not-so-difficult-to-believe. Proof.

Glory!
 
I made the mistake of clicking the last LC thread link.

Once again, that forum is filled with little spoiled children. Pictures of Bulls is their counterarguement? I didn't think they could get any lamer than all the "OWNED" comments.
 
kookbreaker said:
I made the mistake of clicking the last LC thread link.

Once again, that forum is filled with little spoiled children. Pictures of Bulls is their counterarguement? I didn't think they could get any lamer than all the "OWNED" comments.
Click to expand...

I did the same mistake too. It really makes me sick how stupid people can get. I really admire Dubfan to put up with such garbage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom