The Empire State Building was hit by a military plane, but it was not going at full speed, was not a jet and was smaller than the planes that hit the WTC. Plus the structure of the ESB is different than the WTC.IT WAS RAMMED BY A FKING PASSENGER JET AT FULL SPEED!
Can you show me any skyscraper which has ever survived being hit by a commercial airliner at top speed?
Just one.
1975 fire lasted 3 hours, hence reaching to the temprature to a maximum of 700 degrees c
South tower fire lasted 45 mins before collapsing.
Do the math
No, its even better,When I get around to making my list of the dumbest things I've ever heard before I die, "the government used nuclear weapons on 9/11" will probably have to be near the very top.
They wouldn't be that large of an explosion. If buried 6 levels down, the blast and flash could be contained, and fallout would be minimal to non-existent (it wouldn't throw it up far enough or fast enough).
Secondly, NIST reported that 11 columns core were severely damaged in the south tower while only 6 columns core were severed in the north tower. That is impossible because the plane flew right directly toward the center of the north tower.
From my point of view, sept 11 was staged as PSYOP to maximize shock and to juice up the adrenaline/emotional meter to a full scale. I thought the attack in NYC itself was very hollywood style, except for the fact it was real.
The building implosion was also to maximize Silverstein's profit. But that is only from my point of view as i believe the buildings were deliberately imploded.
No, its even better,
a private citizen used nuclear weapons on 9/11, because it was too expensive to pay for asbestos removal!
I'm mean thats not just paranoid idiocy, it's paranoid idiocy squared!
exactly, no tall building has ever survived being hit by a commercial airliner at top speed, it seems a perfectly good explanation for the collapse to me, as well as every expert who has ever look into the matter.The Empire State Building was hit by a military plane, but it was not going at full speed, was not a jet and was smaller than the planes that hit the WTC. Plus the structure of the ESB is different than the WTC.
paranoid idiocy cubed?geggy is going to tell us that both theories are true. Both the gov and Silverstein connived this plan. Two idiot conspiracies are better than one. geggy prefers two levels of idiocy over one simple and very probable theory, the official story.
Secondly, at one point one has to consider motive: if they were going to use explosives to bring down the towers, then why did they crash airplanes into it ? Doesn't that complexify their efforts, considerably ? And if they only used explosives, why would they place demolition charges ? Wouldn't a single bomb do the trick ? They could detonate the bomb and blame a terrorist attack similar to the previous one.
I'd like you to answer that last one.
1975 fire lasted 3 hours, hence reaching to the temprature to a maximum of 700 degrees c
South tower fire lasted 45 mins before collapsing.
Do the math
Yep, the CTers love that because it doesn't show the plane hitting. They ignore the 100+ eyewitnesses who saw a 757 hit. Supposedly at the Moussaoui trial other videos were played that do show the whole thing. Maybe they'll be released some day.
I'd like to ask the CTers if they believe that the Revolutionary War happened. There are no videos or photos from 1776-1782, so where's the proof?
paranoid idiocy cubed?![]()
"entities should be multiplied far, far beyond necessity, rationality and possibility, all entities should be blamed on Bush."lol
Let's call it Geggy's Razor.
Would anyone care to accurately formulate Geggy's Razor for me?
1975 fire lasted 3 hours, hence reaching to the temprature to a maximum of 700 degrees c
South tower fire lasted 45 mins before collapsing.
Do the math
How do you do it, I mean keep up with this and still keep your sanity?![]()
This should be called Geggy's G.U.T.geggy is going to tell us that both theories are true. Both the gov and Silverstein connived this plan. Two idiot conspiracies are better than one. geggy prefers two levels of idiocy over one simple and very probable theory, the official story.
Like I've mentioned before...the towers' absestos was extremely high and the owner was forced to either remove the abestos or condemn the towers...
Interestly that some of you would bring up the exposure of radiation in the air during the nookular fallout...
Read this...
http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2003/wtc/epapr20011003.htm
And yet...
http://www.jhsph.edu/publichealthnews/press_releases/PR_2002/WTC_health.html
Buuuut...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,181925,00.html
Our data show that contaminant levels are low or nonexistent, and are generally confined to the Trade Center site. There is no need for concern among the general public, but residents and business owners should follow recommended procedures for cleaning up homes and businesses if dust has entered.