• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
brodski said:
Asking too many questions- that’s a suspending
Thinking critically- that’s a suspending
Asking "how" CD was carried out- that’s a suspending
Claiming that civilian aircraft hit the WTC- that's a suspending
Asking what you'll get suspended for- that’s a suspending

Suspending a PCT nut over a vat of their own filth- oh you'd better believe that's a suspending. In other news, Troy has now been appointed as the new admin of the loose change forum; Roxdog has lodged a complaint that this new admin is "too soft on the conspiracy-deniers".
Click to expand...

Being know as an engineer with experience in structures:
That's a registration denied...
 
"...there would not be so much blood and gore in a real beheading..."

Oh, Lord.

Can I suggest a few people we could test this on? ;)
 
RandFan said:
I posted a response there. This is reminiscent to me of the McMartin preschool trial. It's a witch hunt and mob mentality. There are no level heads there. Anything and everything goes unchallenged.
Click to expand...

McMartin preschool is some crazy reading! Thanks!
 
RandFan said:
I posted a response there. This is reminiscent to me of the McMartin preschool trial. It's a witch hunt and mob mentality. There are no level heads there. Anything and everything goes unchallenged.
Click to expand...
And there is something wrong with you if you do challenge their pet theories.
 
Loose Change is a bunch of amateur hacks, for my CT daily dosage I go to Alex Jones. Loose Change can't even hold Alex Jones' jockstrap!
 
This is a long thread and I didn't read it all so forgive me if this was asked before, but why wasn't all these "loose change" theorys submitted by the defense in the Moussaoui trial? I mean, he wasn't guilty of anything if the towers were blown up by our own government.
 
haha, "BlandFan" is so fitting- i think most of the CTs are into it for the excitement and thus you are boring because you refuse to gobble it up. whats hilarious is after 9/11 i thought people saw that the gov't isnt nearly as organized and all-seeing as people believed, but i underestimated CTs' tenacity. they one-upped sanity by believing the gov't was really in control the whole time. it makes perfect sense they would assume the gov't was behind 9/11 too. oh well.
 
Last edited:
Starthinker said:
This is a long thread and I didn't read it all so forgive me if this was asked before, but why wasn't all these "loose change" theorys submitted by the defense in the Moussaoui trial? I mean, he wasn't guilty of anything if the towers were blown up by our own government.
Click to expand...

Excellent question. Is anyone here NOT banned from Loose Change's forums to ask it?
 
I haven't made my go-round yet. I'm collecting some of their own "evidence" to have at the ready.

As for Moussaoui, we should have a pool on what the most common answer will be. My money is on some variant of 'he's a retard and the government has the poor sap convinced he's guilty.'
 
manny said:
I haven't made my go-round yet. I'm collecting some of their own "evidence" to have at the ready.

As for Moussaoui, we should have a pool on what the most common answer will be. My money is on some variant of 'he's a retard and the government has the poor sap convinced he's guilty.'
Click to expand...

I am predicting you will be banned when you join Losse Change's forums and ask your questions. Yes, I am psychic. :D
 
unfortunately the reason CTs can feel self satisfied in their arguments so easily is they can simply refute any arguments with further CTs. i am certain any suggestion about moussauoi would be written off as he is a patsy that yadda yadda and the govt isnt letting the defense use any evidence blah blah.

also, you have the dreaded argument "well i am not saying the gov't did X Y or Z but they obviously are hiding something," hence, you cant really argue because they are basically saying "you might have some point about something, but overall, you have to admit something is totally wrong." thats the one i get. i had a couple of guys come into my bosses office and start jabbering about LC and he didnt know anything about it, so he just asked some very simple questions like "why would someone do that, what is the motivation" and they just said "man, no one knows, but you can tell what the govt said is lies, so we're just trying to figure it out." i didnt even enter the conversation, it was pointless.

oh and one other thing, i hate how smug and condescending CTs are. if you question their theories, they just treat you as a sad, naive sould who is being played the fool.

Oh, BTW, i left my bosses office and forwarded him a couple of succint articles debunking all the info the coworkers had just fed him just so we could have a laugh without sending them into some sort of tizzy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom