• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Since geggery has left the land of rational posting, I'll throw something out that I haven't seen addressed as of yet:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/videos/fiveframes.html

Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Yep, the CTers love that because it doesn't show the plane hitting. They ignore the 100+ eyewitnesses who saw a 757 hit. Supposedly at the Moussaoui trial other videos were played that do show the whole thing. Maybe they'll be released some day.

I'd like to ask the CTers if they believe that the Revolutionary War happened. There are no videos or photos from 1776-1782, so where's the proof?
 
Would someone care to give me a synopsis of this thread from about the middle of it onward? I was following it but I have been too busy to keep up.

Or is it the same old:
Conspiracy Theorist suggests evidence
Sceptics show evidence wrong or otherwise insufficient
Conspiracy Theorist suggests additional evidence more bizarre than the first
Which is also shown to be wrong.

That whole trite thing?

-=-=-=-

At any rate, it's nice to know that Delphi_Ote dislikes Linkin Park as much as I do. Perhaps we should start a thread on crappy music and why people like it. It's almost paranormal, that.
 
Pardalis said:
Let's bet this is what geggy is going to answer you with:

from Americanfreepress

"A “sharp spike of short duration” is how seismologist Thorne Lay of University of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an underground nuclear explosion appears on a seismograph."
Click to expand...

I wonder how long it will take before the Loosers start saying that it was a Zionist mini-nuke that took out the WTC and created the pools of molten metal - here's a fun little link to when Loosers and Holocaust deniers mate:

http://www.vialls.com/nuke/bali_nuke.htm

Because, we all know, bloodthirsty Muslim terrorists would never do anything like blow up innocent people.
 
brodski said:
Maybe we could start a 9/11 CT band? You could be on blunt instruments whilst geggy plays the buffoon. The loosers could chime in, in chorus, singing the same old tune and Gravy, Delphi_ote & Chipmunk_stew could sing in a perfect counterpoint to the loosers, making groundbaking use of reason and facts.
Click to expand...

im a drummer but for these guys i'll play the spoons.

* yes I am catching up with all the posts *
 
Polaris said:
I wonder how long it will take before the Loosers start saying that it was a Zionist mini-nuke that took out the WTC and created the pools of molten metal - here's a fun little link to when Loosers and Holocaust deniers mate:
Click to expand...
Geggy already did back on post #2295
 
BTW I like the planting evidence in Loose Change 3 challenge. At the very least they might get paranoid enough to start double checking their information.
 
emperorchaos said:
Would someone care to give me a synopsis of this thread from about the middle of it onward? I was following it but I have been too busy to keep up.

Or is it the same old:
Conspiracy Theorist suggests evidence
Sceptics show evidence wrong or otherwise insufficient
Conspiracy Theorist suggests additional evidence more bizarre than the first
Which is also shown to be wrong.

That whole trite thing?
Click to expand...

That about says it, but I daresay WE'VE learned a lot from our research.

I do suggest that as an experiment, the next time geggy posts we all agree with him. No dissent. I wonder if he would be okay.
 
geggy said:
I'd give you an answer if you give me the video. I'm very interested in seeing it. PM it to me or whatever, it doesn't have to be a full hour. Just 5 minutes for a quick download. Then I could send it to 911myths.com for them to post it on their website. Also I asked you to provide me a link as to what started the fire inside the wtc7 then I will answer you your question so nyah nyah nyah.

heh.

Sure argue with me on my weakest point of sept 11. Post the question again. I may have missed it. I'll try my best to answer it.



EXACTLY I'm a little inclined to think that Karl Rove, the white house's spinmaster, may have written the script for the Osama video to paint Michael Moore and the democrats as terrorists. Correct me wrong but didn't F911 documentry come out the previous summer or the year before? That Karl Rove is one clever diabolical dude, even I have to be impressed with his insipidness.
Click to expand...

I'm dizzy.
 
Gravy said:
May have missed it? This is the fifth time I've requested your response. The first was on this post.

Since you brought it up, what would say is your strongest argument that supports your hypothesis that the U.S. government is behind the attacks of 9/11?

You were an imaging major or something at RIT, but you can't pull up a common video on the internet? Methinks my little fixéd star of foolishness doth protest too much in order to avoideth the issue!. You accused me of altering my image, but are you now saying that your stills weren't screenshots that you made from video? Then how do you know WHERE they came from and that THEY weren't photoshopped?

sdited to fix grammar
Click to expand...
Gravy said:
May have missed it? This is the fifth time I've requested your response. The first was on this post.

Since you brought it up, what would say is your strongest argument that supports your hypothesis that the U.S. government is behind the attacks of 9/11?

You were an imaging major or something at RIT, but you can't pull up a common video on the internet? Methinks my little fixéd star of foolishness doth protest too much in order to avoideth the issue!. You accused me of altering my image, but are you now saying that your stills weren't screenshots that you made from video? Then how do you know WHERE they came from and that THEY weren't photoshopped?

sdited to fix grammar
Click to expand...

Hey there it is...I'll try my best to answer...please believe, I wasn't ignoring your question. Just that I'm being bombarded with different questions that Im having hard times catching up.

The 1975 fire,on the 11th floor fire was burning intensely at 700 degrees census for three hour. The fire then subsequntly spread from 9th floor to the 19th floor (yes it did as the repport indicated it), although it was small, the firemen were able to control and subside it. Yet the trusses and the core did not fail despite the weight load of the upper 90 floors that it held up . On sept 11, the fire was not as intense as it was in 1975, could not have reached anywhere near the melting temp point of the steel. Because the plane was flying at a high speed as it flew through the building as if it was a pin, and the flames shot out of the building hence only causing local damages in the area of the impact. The damages made to the concrete slabs that were embedded in the trusses had to be at least minimal. The fire could have not affected the trusses whatsoever, because the fire was nowhere burning intensely. Fuel only evaporizes in in a short period of time. You saw that most of fuel bursted into flames during the impact, thus very little puddle of fuel on the floor in the area of the impactwere burning off. The burning of office supplies couldn't have been hot enough for the core columns to fail.

And as for the still frames of the fake osama video came from this site, in which that piece o' crap site 911myths linked in their site...look into it and tell me if you think they were manipulated in any way....

http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm

My strongest point would be the fact that sept 11 was staged as PSYOP (which I've already covered), the history of bush crime familia and the excess /obstructing of investigation/cover up which I've not gotten to yet. be prepared

Now you owe me a link as to what started the fire in wtc7 AND a short video clip of your osama tape. I'll crap in my pants if you do.
 
Gravy said:
Yep, the CTers love that because it doesn't show the plane hitting.
Click to expand...
Look on the right side of the first picture, just above that little brown box. Look back and forth between the first and second pictures. You CAN see the tail of the plane in the first image.
 
A picture of flaming wreckage falling off the WTC was posted earlier. I know you didn't miss it, because you misidentified it as "molten steel."
 
geggy said:
My strongest point would be the fact that sept 11 was staged as PSYOP (which I've already covered), the history of bush crime familia and the excess /obstructing of investigation/cover up which I've not gotten to yet. be prepared
Click to expand...

Oh, we're on the edges of our seats, big guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom