• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
If anybody else wants a hi-res printable version of that flyer I edited a while back ('we're getting nowhere!') send me a PM and I'll get it over to you.

Many thanks to The Fire for the source material.
 
Apparently my ban was switched to a suspension (again), and I can post once more. There is a curious addition to my information area, a "warn %." Does this mean I'll be warned before I'm suspended or banned this time? They still never told me why I was suspended and banned before, now their going to at least let me know the level of their ire towards me, but still not tell me what I'm doing wrong (or right).
 
The warning bar is there for everyone. If it has a number next to it other than 0, then you did sometihng to piss them off and clicking on the number will tell you what.
 
Last edited:
Shrinker said:
If anybody else wants a hi-res printable version of that flyer I edited a while back ('we're getting nowhere!') send me a PM and I'll get it over to you.

Many thanks to The Fire for the source material.
Click to expand...


No problem all though my 'puter is still mighty miffed at me for forcing it over to a certain ct infested blog to get it ;).
 
Ahh, you just reminded me of a question. What's a woo? I think I know the general idea (wacko CTer) but why woo?

(i know what a WOC is, it's what you fwow at a wabbit)
 
After reading 10,000 of the 14,000 posts you have on Loose change (my brain started to bleed part way through the part III) and all 3,000 odd posts in christophera's thread on the invisible concrete cores, I know that I can't post external links. You have to keep out the spam bots, I know.

But I have written an article about this and since I "borrowed" a whole lot of research from these very forums, I wanted to share it before I put it up on my own site. This is the address minus the stuff at the beginning:

pointlesswasteoftime.com/911truth.html

You guys seem to be cool with people posting links as long as they're actually relevant to the discussion so I hope this isn't considered breaking some kind of rule. If it is I apologize, I'm not trying to mess up your forums. I've logged probably 75 hours here the last two weeks. This discussion simply isn't happening anywhere else on the level that it's happening here.

There is adult language in that article, by the way.
 
Jennie C. said:
Ahh, you just reminded me of a question. What's a woo? I think I know the general idea (wacko CTer) but why woo?

(i know what a WOC is, it's what you fwow at a wabbit)
Click to expand...

http://skepdic.com/woowoo.html

Woo-woo (or just plain woo) refers to ideas considered irrational or based on extremely flimsy evidence or that appeal to mysterious occult forces or powers.

Here's a dictionary definition of woo-woo:

adj. concerned with emotions, mysticism, or spiritualism; other than rational or scientific; mysterious; new agey. Also n., a person who has mystical or new age beliefs.

When used by skeptics, woo-woo is a derogatory and dismissive term used to refer to beliefs one considers nonsense or to a person who holds such beliefs.

Sometimes woo-woo is used by skeptics as a synonym for pseudoscience, true-believer, or quackery. But mostly the term is used for its emotive content and is an emotive synonym for such terms as nonsense, irrational, nutter, nut, or crazy.

For example:

1. "But the woo-woo faction has adopted the word "organic" to apply only to a plant grown without the use of anything but water and faith."*
2. I think love is the one thing that should remain firmly in the realm of the woo-woo.*
3. The National Institutes of Health offered a course in feng shui, which prompted James Randi to write of woo-woo at the NIH.
4. ...the woo-woos ... are more comfortable being ignorant of reality.*
Click to expand...
 
Well written, David. I particularly liked the way that just under the bit about the eevil gummint's weather control machines there was an ad for a Tornado 3 electric fan.

The Halliburton and Freemasons ads were a nice touch as well.
:D
 
David; Welcome to the JREF Skeptics Forum on Consipracy Theories. I enjoyed your piece of writing tremendously. I will be posting a link to it over at my site, 911 - You Judge later today.

TAM
 
It also appears Halliburton's new logo is the satanic owl from Bohemian Grove.

Thanks for the kind words, everybody.
 
Welcome David.

Which makes me think, how many people registered in the last few days? Boy, this is like a gym club after the hollidays! :D

It's proof that 9/11 is a crucial event and that it matters to everyone.

Let's hope that as more people are logging in, the more the CTs will be seen for what they are: complete BS.
 
I was just over at the Morgan Reynolds site. This was posted there, august 29th, so probably already posted here, but it is so enlightening wrt how deep the divide in the two camps is...just read the words...the tone in the article...even the title...

Jonesville

From the tone, they could have called it "Jonestown"...lol

TAM
 
T.A.M. said:
Seems the "scholars" are miffed (sorry if already posted)...

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/PressRelease20060909.html

TAM
Click to expand...
Scholars for Truth said:
“And since the official account-that the events of 9/11 involved 19 Islamic fundamentalists hijacking four commercial airliners and perpetrating terrorist acts under control of a man in a cave in Afghanistan-involves a conspiracy, it is impossible to study 9/11 without dealing with conspiracy theories.”

Fetzer thinks the administration wants to suppress serious research on 9/11 because the official account cannot withstand scrutiny. “What the government has told us is just fine if you are willing to believe impossible things,” he observed. “Its truth requires violating laws of physics and engineering that cannot be violated and cannot be changed.”
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension problem on the part of Fetzer, or doublespeak?

This gets sadder every day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom