• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Technically it's up on YouTube, but one part refuses to validate and I need to update two parts of the video that are somehow messed up.

Marky, is there a link to help me find your YouTube videos, or were you waiting for final validation before posting it?

I can wait ....
:)
 
If you use Hushaboom (tm) to blow up Invisicrete (tm), how can you tell if anything has happened?

The monk opened his mouth as if to reply, but before he could speak the master raised his cane high above his head and shouted, "I AM THE ENTIRETY OF THE UNIVERSE!" and smashed his cane down on the monk's head.

Whereupon, the monk became enlightened.
 
Also, aspartame = Formaldehyde/Methanol

To the best of my knowledge the jury's still out on aspartame. I hate the taste, though.

The point I'm trying to make is that right now "we the people" are so blind to the fact that our tax dollars are responsible for the death of millions of innocent people on the other side of the globe.. that we don't even recognize that we are being slaughtered with cancer, among other diseases in our own country.

Liar. We're very much aware that 1/3 people are affected by cancer (whether of not that statistics is true.) And I'm still waiting on your evidence for that food thing.

For example, B-17, it is derived from natural apricot seeds and it is also illegal in this country, because it cures cancer.

Everything is derived from natural stuff. Please provide your evidence that it "cures cancer".

Cancer isn't "cured" like the common cold. I would venture to say that the natural tendency of ALL cells is to be cancerous. There are mechanisms that prevent this, for obvious reasons, but this means that the slightest damage to a cell's genetic structure can cause cancer.

I certainly don't see it as a sign of graffiti or disrespect, sorry if you take it that way. It's just an obvious way to point out the fact that if only 25% of the structural beams inside of the towers were less than "failure temperature", then the structures wouldn't have fallen straight down into their footprints.

Speculation.

Regardless what the "professionals" say, there is no way in hell that each and every beam in the "extreme heat" zone would have failed to support the weight of the structure at the same time.

They didn't need to, really.

And why, AGAIN, scare quotes around "professionals" ?

A simple release of video footage from the cameras surrounding the pentagon would eliminate much of the confusion.

But they WERE released.

I thought this was a forum of intelligent minded people

You were correct, and thank you. Do you deny that explosions can be the result of things that aren't explosives ?

who could accept what their eyes can see in the images and videos instead of reading the "reports" which are as worthless as toilet paper, because the evidence that was analyzed no longer exist.

Well, I'm sorry if reading makes your mind numb, but to me, the analysis of people whose expertise far exceeds mine is much more reliable than videos that I am not qualified to interpret.

It would seem logical that if you were looking for the "suspects" that you wouldn't have to look any further than those who erased the overwhelming majority of the physical evidence. right ?

Wrong. The steel HAD to be taken away. The planes HAD to be taken away. You can't just let these things sit there forever.

And I hate to inform you, but there are certain ingredients that have been intentionally added to our food supply that does in fact make most people ignorant.

They MAKE people ignorant ? Honestly, I don't know how that would happen. Do they decrease the intelligence, or remove memories, or what ? In either case, please provide evidence that this is the case. A double-blind test would be appreciated.

Research the effects of the "freak amino acid" in our dairy supply and the formaldehyde/methanol in our artificial sugar supply.

Chemtrails, too, perhaps ?

It would seem that most rational minded people that have accepted the fact that our protection agencies have failed to actually protect us, could also accept the fact that the system has infact, for some reason, chosen to intentionally poison the American mind with chemicals and propaganda.

All I see is words, sub. No links or proof. That doesn't tend to sit well with JREFers in general, and with me in particular.


You might have noticed, so far, that I'm not the kind of person to be swayed by appeals to emotion. Your "sorry", there, had no effect.

If you watch the news, whenever someone is speaking from the white house you can see the flag of israel flying next to the American flag on a daily basis. It is no secret who's agenda our tax dollars promote.

I see nothing wrong with that, per se.

I called my first fire chief that morning and we both agreed that "something ain't right" about this.

Gut feeling. Not a very good tool in investigation, unless you're Columbo.

Maybe that made it easier for me to see past the smoke at Ground Zero and notice the smoke/smog saturating the skies in the background and look for the "overall" problem.

Simultaneously ignoring the true perpetrators ?

The unnoticed loss of life that takes place in this country on a daily basis from CUREABLE diseases is staggering, considering the "fact" that, according to official reports... no cure exist.

Interesting you say this. Two years ago I broke my big toe on my right foot. Not long afterwards I had ingrown nail problems so last year I had it operated. It was supposed to be a one-time deal and be done with it. But about an hour ago I returned from ANOTHER operation to the SAME toe because the damn root of the nail had decided to not cooperate with the doctor. Medecine isn't mathematics; it's a complex thing. If a simple ingrown nail can cause problems, how can you possibly believe that those other, much more complicated problems are so easily solved ?

We ARE all ONE, and in this country, we are not far from suffocating ourselves.

I'm Canadian, thanks. Lots of people from the UK, here, too. And from around the world. Perhaps you should forego that preaching part.
 
I've said it before: I dare any of these 'Cancer cures are being supressed by doctors' crowd to go up to a medical professional who works in the Cancer ward of a hospital (one of the most depressing jobs in medicine as I understand it). They should then explain their theory, with full inclusion that they consider the people working in the Cancer ward to be just as culpable.

They might then reconsider their flakey opinions while their face is being reattached.

Still Off Topic (sorry guys):
I had a women in her mid 40's come in to me the other day. She has been my patient for 2 years now. I had to tell her that she has Cancer, and that it has gone so far, there is no cure...One of the hardest things I do...

I have worked on a Cancer floor. I have worked in the pediatric oncology unit...you think telling a woman in her 40's she has cancer is hard...try telling the parents of 6 year old that there son has a Wilm's Tumor...I thought I would actually throw up that day...and it is hard to make me sick...

That is why when I hear this **** it makes me mad. I know Submersible isnt blaming The professionals that administer the care, but we are the ones who work with the drug companies. I have been involved in control trials, and other medical studies sponsored by the drug companies. They provide numerous advantages to patients and Doctors. Gone are the days where they take you out for weekend excursions...drug companies provide Doctors with Free education, they provide them with tonnes of free medical samples for those who cannot afford their meds. They develop new drugs that help fight serious illnesses.

Are they in it for the money...you bet..isn't that what capitalism is all about. But they also do a lot of good, which of course, few people point out.

Like I said before, there is no "cure" for almost all cancers, except surgical excision, which is done all the time. The rest is life extension...buying time...and thanks to these drug comanies, we can buy alot more time.

I could spend a whole hour talking about this...but we are way off topic. If another "Drug" CT thread starts, I will resume it there...

TAM
 
Well it's obvious that WTC7 had been exposed to Submersibles food additives making it too stupid to realize it was supposed to fall down after the CD charges went off.
 
Dylan reckons he has uncovered a new smoking gun: 'videos of flashes going off inside WTC7 hours before collapse' http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Ch...&#entry7076466

Watch the video however(a hefty 79mb for 11 seconds of footage) and it looks like something fusing. A big load of nothing


No doubt this will be their new "smoking gun". Meanwhile, do they even stop to think...(1) Buildings that are demolished, do not do so HOURS after you set off the explosives, (2) To properly demolish a building, the explosives are place on every floor...so where are the flashes on every floor, (3) Sploding transformers, Power surges to overhead lights, exploding aerisol containers, the list goes on, of what can cause large flashes, (4) were there any audio "Explosions" shortly after (sound lags light) the "flashes".

Then again, do we expect such OBVIOUS, LOGICAL, questions from the morons that are LTW Inc...
 
Gut feeling. Not a very good tool in investigation, unless you're Columbo.

Hey now, let's not say things we can't take back. Columbo would start with a gut feeling (as you say, he would use it as a tool) and gather evidence to prove or disprove it, using experts in the fields that he knew nothing about. He rarely voiced his theories until he had all the facts and evidence to prove his theory (and the show was about to end), or was directly asked by a superior. Of course, it is a TV show.

Some CTers start with the gut feeling, and don't do any futher investigation. Others will investigate only the evidence that supports their theory, and ignore any other evidence.
 
Last edited:
For starters, both flashes come out of same window. Secondly, given there are other smaller "reflective" changes in other areas on the surface of this building, it could be light reflecting off glass.

As well, can we tell from the video if it in fact WTC 7?

Are we suppose to have believed that only CD Explosions occured in a highrise building that was on fire for 7 hours. So nothing else could have caused those "Flashes" that have no audio "boom" attached...once again, go look at the "landmark" tower Cd, and turn the volume up...now repeat after me...

"CD involves loud noises....CD involves loud noises....CD involves loud noises..."
 
Last edited:
of course, jdhammer and wakingupamy solidify the Consipracy theory way of thinking on the matter...

1. If it happens, we were right...we predicted it...cover up.
2. If it doesnt happen, then they were on to us, and put it off cause they knew we knew...lol

Just F&*king priceless...welcome to the Neanderthals of the Internet.

TAM
 
The loosers have made a shocking discovery, these may be my last days. Apparently the evil folks who brought you 9/11 are going to blow up Chicago Thursday. If I die in the inferno, I hope all you here avenge my death!

I'd leave town, but well, you know, traffic and the price of gas and all...

Oh no! My hubby is coming to Chicago tomorrow, for a Circus Fans convention. They wouldn't blow up circus fans, would they? ;)

(where's the tongue-in-cheek smiley?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom