Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
ROFLMAO

better not let the scholars at "Smacco's Razor", besides accidentally cutting themselves with it, they might purposely kill each other with it
 
If you was to hazzard a guess. Who wields greater Woooo power, LC, or The "stoners",oops....."Scholars"?
 
You guys are not going to believe this, but guess who is the voice of reason over at the LC forum wrt to Jones/Woods/Reynolds....

" I dont understand why so many people are attacking Steve Jones.. he's just learning like the rest of us.

I also cannot understand how anyone can commit to any theory, until that theory is proven.

Granted, i havent read the full article. But arent we all trying to learn and get to the truth? Some of us are on different levels of our research. Why are people bashing Jones as he is trying to get to the truth?

So what if he thinks Al Quada is responsible and Jones appears more of a LIHOP researcher. Let him continue his research until al lthe facts are available.

Am i wrong in saying this? Or should everyone be a MIHOP out of the box..."
- JohndoeX

Yup thats right...lol...the apocalypse is upon us...
 
Dog Town said:
If you was to hazzard a guess. Who wields greater Woooo power, LC, or The "stoners",oops....."Scholars"?
Click to expand...
I think they're complementary. People know the LC guys aren't exactly whiz kids at science, so backing up LC's claims with the Scholars' work lends them "credibility." And from the Loosers the Scholars get a much wider, younger audience than they could attract on their own. In terms of overall influence, I would guess LC, by a very large margin.
 
Real quick, does anyone have a link to the Woods Keebler Elf powerpoint thing offhand? I want to show it to the g/f because she doesn't believe me that someone could be that bizarre.
 
Gravy said:
Inspired by Realitybites and by the Jones/Wood/Reynolds battle royale, I've come up with a new term. It's to be used when a CT's argument gets more and more complex, as when Reynolds says that thermite couldn't have brought down the towers, so high-energy weapons must have been involved. "Smacco's Rozar," the Occam's Razor of the Bizarro World. Whenever you see it invoked, you must smack your self on the forehead.
Click to expand...

Check out this post on the Looser Forum, quoting Rick Siegel (the child prodigy):

However, while I believe that thermate may have been used to initiate the collapse in conjunction with cutting charges such as RDX, it cannot begin to explain the observed evidence at the WTC and therefore I feel that we must now include fusion devices as well in our demolition hypothesis and research.

The significance of this line of research is that while thermate alone could be blamed on a small group of individuals impossible to identify, fusion devices can only be supplied by the US and/or Israeli military, according to a Finnish military expert I have consulted.
Click to expand...

Yep, Rick Siegel is lecturing Steven Jones on fusion devices.:boggled:
 
why is it that none of these CTers realize fusion devices have a minimum yeild in the hundreds of kilotons (thats 10-20 times a "hiroshima bomb")

anyone see one of these in new york?
nagasaki-001.jpg
 
defaultdotxbe said:
why is it that none of these CTers realize fusion devices have a minimum yeild in the hundreds of kilotons (thats 10-20 times a "hiroshima bomb")

anyone see one of these in new york?
[qimg]http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/ops/images/nagasaki-001.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

It was a nano-fusion bomb, using Karl Schwarz's patented nanotube technology.
 
Huntsman said:
Hey, does anyone whatch "Eureka" on the SciFi channel?

I bet they used one of those ionosphere laser death rays from the last episode...I mean, that was made back in the sixties!!

:D
Click to expand...

add the producers to the list of "closet truthers"
 
I did have a look at the yield of a suitcase size nuke. The smallest nuclear weapon is the W54 Davy Crockett, yield 0.01 Kilotonnes, so that's 10 tonnes of conventional explosives, or just over 2.5 on the richter scale.

Except that's not on the seismograph readings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom