• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's sort of like that old saying, "A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link."

Steve S.
I tend to think of it more as "the force (hydraulic, pneumatic, etc) follows the path of least resistance", although your analogy works fine as well.
 
AFAIK squibs are movie props (sortof) a tiny explosive they use to blow up a fake blood pack when someoen gets shot in a movie

there could be a second definition though

The only squibs I'm aware of are the small electrical charges used to rupture sealing discs of fire extinguishing bottles on airplanes.
So naturally I giggle whenever I see CTers bring up "squibs" :)
 
The "Truth" movement, IMO, is about to become a victim of their own "success". They've attracted just enough attention from MSM to get critically examined and shown publicly to be (rule8)tards. After the public crucifixion, they'll be shackled to the Stone of Everlasting Shame and sent back to whatever hole it is they crawled out of. I hope this happens soon.

It reminds me of the guy who wrote that book A Million Little Pieces. He writes a work of fiction, but it doesn't sell very well. So he retools it as an autobiography and suddenly he's on Oprah and the book is selling millions of units. But then the MSM starts to scrutinize the book and suddenly his house of cards comes tumbling down.

So Dylan makes an admittedly fictional movie, releases it as a "documentary," and the CT crowd goes wild for it. Now the scrutiny begins. Too bad he never got on Oprah.

Steve S.
 
Gravy, Dylan finally figured out who you are. Aren't you relieved? It must have been hell for you, not knowing.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9992&view=findpost&p=6577801
Avery's fact-checking department is hard at work again. See, MarkyX, I told you I was you!

As for us trying to cause a disruption at Ground Zero in order to get the police involved, it was the Deniers who:

– Grabbed our literature and tore it up.
– Threw our signs into a fenced-off construction area.
– Tried to physically block our access to a public sidewalk.
– Said they'd call the police and file harrassment charges if I spoke.
– Did cause the police to be involved when one of them started shouting at me while I was speaking to a member of the public.
 
i think on some level even the CTers realize their conspiracy is too big to keep under wraps, thats why they keep saying "only a few people would have to be involved"

then they turn the same logic to debunkers, they cant fathom that dozens of intelligent people disagree with them, so they consolidate them all into one singular "Gravy" who they can easily label a govt shill or CIA operative

in conclusion, i need to start pimping my forums, maybe i can be Gravy too
 
Dylan - Quit "asking questions" if you want to make accusations come out and make them, but be prepared to face the consequences if you cant back them up with solid evidence

Because he knows as soon as they go from "asking questions" to "making statements" things like libel and slander become much easier to prove in court.
 
Because he knows as soon as they go from "asking questions" to "making statements" things like libel and slander become much easier to prove in court.

that seems almost too foreward thinking for a CT. I dunno, I think it's something else that makes them act that way. It's like "i gotta secret and i'm gonna hint around about it...." behavior.
 
that seems almost too foreward thinking for a CT. I dunno, I think it's something else that makes them act that way. It's like "i gotta secret and i'm gonna hint around about it...." behavior.
To me, I think the reason is pretty basic. The minute they go from asking questions to making claims, games over, the movement (and their livelihood), will fall apart since they have nothing to back up any claims. Continuing to just "ask questions" (and the resulting innuendo) allows them to avoid having to provide answers.
 
I know Markyx, and how ever many people he is, will enjoy this.
I posted the Onion piece over at Colbert, under a new thread, "Stone reveals new 911 plane conspiracy".I then qouted the blow the lid off the 911 report paragraph. I sat back and waited for the pole to bob. First hit was by B Real, head moon bat over there!
B.Real---(start stoopid)
"Ohh great

"New Oliver Stone 9/11 Film Introduces 'Single Plane' Theory"

WTF is that crap. This ******* is going to do more damage than good. I can't believe he wouldn't address the 100s of eyewitness accounts that talk about huge explosions and flashes before the building even fell. You know, like the ****ing firemen that where actually there said". (end stoopid)

- Then some wisenheimer, with the handle KT, posts "you do know that is satire correct".Wonder who that was? KKK Clown perhaps(not really paranoid)?
So with my cover blown, I respond to B Real and KT

(me)
"Just wanted to see how well they read before they reacted.Just as I thought! Thanks for blowing it. Hey BReal how long did it take to get that hook out of your mouth?

LOL..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................Still Laughing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

B REAL YOU DUMB ASS!"

-- Thought you might get a laugh! God knows you guys make me chuckle with with your antics.

DT
 
Last edited:
Then some wisenheimer, with the handle KT, posts "you do know that is satire correct".Wonder who that was? KKK Clown perhaps(not really paranoid)?
So with my cover blown, I respond to B Real and KT

(me)
"Just wanted to see how well they read before they reacted.Just as I thought! Thanks for blowing it. Hey BReal how long did it take to get that hook out of your mouth?

Heheh, you went monkey-fishing and caught one! KT is almost certainly Killtown.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom