Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I wanted to say that the area of Beruit that was hit so hard is only 1% of the city and it was an area that was heavily populated with Hezbollah fighters.

I wish I could find the link to a site that shows how Lebanon is staging photos and how Reuters is deliberately falsifying their captions to make Israel look like the bad guys. It was posted on JREF, but searches aren't pulling up anything. Littlegreenfootballs has a lot of stuff about it, though.
 
Perry Logan posted an interesting video today on 9/11 Deniers.

Should I have heard of this guy before? I went to perrylogan.org and found it quite hilarious on several levels, but I'm having a hard time figuring him out. Is is live, or is it Memorex? Is it real, or is it Spinal Tap? Either way, his sense of humor appeals to me. Thanks for the link~
 
He mocks the truth movement. It is somewhat real. Perry Logan is actually a 'fictional personality character' that the handsome gentlemen uses to mock right-wingers and other goofballs.

But he is serious in his message. He despises Republicans with a passion. But Perry Logan is not his real name.

We are fans of each other's work bascailly.
 
Speaking of which, I got an interesting email today about a possible interview on Screw Loose Change on an Israeli newspaper. They are interviewing Dylan and gang also.

Can anyone do a background on Haaretz Daily Newspaper? I don't want to walk myself into a media trap (aka Penn and Teller :) )
 
Speaking of which, I got an interesting email today about a possible interview on Screw Loose Change on an Israeli newspaper. They are interviewing Dylan and gang also.

Can anyone do a background on Haaretz Daily Newspaper? I don't want to walk myself into a media trap (aka Penn and Teller :) )

It's left of center, but not nutty left. Generally considered credible.
 
Guys;

I am presently rsearching Waleed Al-Shehri. Now I have compiled a time line based on the Moussaoui Trial data, and the Saudi Info, as well as the interview with his half brother, Abdel Rhaman...

What I am having trouble rectifying is this. There was a report of a Waleed Al-Shehri living in Vienna, in 1999, and one of his roomates was Ahmed Alghamdi. Now I can accept that perhaps this Waleed was another guy, perhaps the Saudi Pilot who graduated From Embree Riddle in 1997, but for that Waleed to also have a roomate Ahmed Alghamdi, same name as another of the hijackers, seems awfully "coincidental" guys got any info to help clarify this for me, or any thoughts???
 
Nice find Abbyas;

Korey is the weakest of the three, from the debating pov as well as how much of the LC mantra he knows.

Likely, if they agree to a debate all (highly unlikely), it will be D.A. or Bermas...
 
Attention Gravy, I think your getting to him:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=11584&st=0&#entry6929634

Dylan Avery on LC Forum said:
okay. be that as it may, the fact is, we don't have time for mark roberts. i'm more concerned in moving on and producing the third edition than squabbling with some "tour guide" in NYC who feels he's the moral majority, and spends most of his "viewer's guide" slinging conjecture and ad hominems.

i've already spoken to a number of people deeply entrenched in 9/11 this week, and I'm about to go interview a major one on Tuesday. is Mark Roberts to tell me that every single person I've talked to that has suffered because of the government is lying or crazy? who is he? who made him king?

mark roberts has nothing on this movement. he never has, and he never will, and he knows that deep inside. that's why he results to attacking our character and insinuating. he personally wrote Nancy Jo Sales and accused her of publishing a false record of Korey's military service, without ANY proof.

things like that are the reason i have no interest in debating mark roberts. popular mechanics will at least debate us on evidence, instead of personally attacking us on a constant basis without any proof.


Great work in that thread Abbyas I think your badge is coming

Jon
 
I particularly love this comment from Dylan...

okay. be that as it may, the fact is, we don't have time for mark roberts. i'm more concerned in moving on and producing the third edition than squabbling with some "tour guide" in NYC who feels he's the moral majority, and spends most of his "viewer's guide" slinging conjecture and ad hominems.

i've already spoken to a number of people deeply entrenched in 9/11 this week, and I'm about to go interview a major one on Tuesday. is Mark Roberts to tell me that every single person I've talked to that has suffered because of the government is lying or crazy? who is he? who made him king?

mark roberts has nothing on this movement. he never has, and he never will, and he knows that deep inside. that's why he results to attacking our character and insinuating. he personally wrote Nancy Jo Sales and accused her of publishing a false record of Korey's military service, without ANY proof.

things like that are the reason i have no interest in debating mark roberts. popular mechanics will at least debate us on evidence, instead of personally attacking us on a constant basis without any proof.
 
I wish I could find the link to a site that shows how Lebanon is staging photos and how Reuters is deliberately falsifying their captions to make Israel look like the bad guys

Here's one.

zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
 
I particularly love this comment from Dylan...

okay. be that as it may, the fact is, we don't have time for mark roberts. i'm more concerned in moving on and producing the third edition than squabbling with some "tour guide" in NYC who feels he's the moral majority, and spends most of his "viewer's guide" slinging conjecture and ad hominems.

i've already spoken to a number of people deeply entrenched in 9/11 this week, and I'm about to go interview a major one on Tuesday. is Mark Roberts to tell me that every single person I've talked to that has suffered because of the government is lying or crazy? who is he? who made him king?

mark roberts has nothing on this movement. he never has, and he never will, and he knows that deep inside. that's why he results to attacking our character and insinuating. he personally wrote Nancy Jo Sales and accused her of publishing a false record of Korey's military service, without ANY proof.

things like that are the reason i have no interest in debating mark roberts. popular mechanics will at least debate us on evidence, instead of personally attacking us on a constant basis without any proof.

His Tuesday one is the same newspaper as mine :)

At least I think it's the same one.
 
I like how there is a phone conversation that 'proves' that 'pull it' means demolish a building.

even though the woman on the phone says it means "pull it down' which is 100% consistent with what has been said by debunkers
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom