Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mashuna said:
Own up, when you say you've already sent him Gravy's debunk of Loose Change, you mean you've been issuing him with death threats, don't you. DON'T YOU! :boggled:
Click to expand...
With some of the things Meacher has done in is career I've been tempted, but him being a 9/11 CT nut isn't on the top of that list. :p
 
Sentinel, I have two questions for you. Please don't take them the wrong way; I'm asking them honestly. The answers may help to clear up why people are having trouble understanding your posts.

1) How old are you?

2) Is English your first language?

Thanks in advance for your honesty.
 
dubfan said:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6304&view=findpost&p=5294085



Don't you just HATE that? You start explaining your conspiracy theory to your buddies and maybe the hottie at the bar with the kickin little tramp-stamp, and you listen to yourself, and you think, "My god, what am I saying? Am I some kind of wacko?"

The answer to that question is, yes. If you are talking about voice-changing devices, you are a wacko.
Click to expand...

Voice changing devices only work on pre-recorded conservations. Even so, you would need to study the personality of each and every person so they make it sound 'authentic' to the loved ones.

Remember that Mark talked to two of his relatives before talking with his mom. The voice-morphing technology only stated that they go for recorded messages and didn't say anything about fooling multiple people in a live conversation. Therefore, no technology was used on Flight 93.
 
MarkyX said:
Voice changing devices only work on pre-recorded conservations. Even so, you would need to study the personality of each and every person so they make it sound 'authentic' to the loved ones.

Remember that Mark talked to two of his relatives before talking with his mom. The voice-morphing technology only stated that they go for recorded messages and didn't say anything about fooling multiple people in a live conversation. Therefore, no technology was used on Flight 93.
Click to expand...


Which devices specifically are you referring to? If there was a link I apologise for missing it but this thread moves fast.

I am a recording engineer, and any computer effect you can use on a prerecorded snippet can be modified to affect a streaming recording too.


Not that I support this theory, but let's at least get our arguments accurate.
 
Would a sound-a-like be good enough though? People talk in particular ways, I realise they'd be in a stressful situation, but people tend to say things in one way rather than another. My only example of this is a bit weak, but I talked to my friends boyfriend on MSN once, and ratted him out straight away, because the way he says stuff is different from the way she says stuff.
 
fowlsound said:
Which devices specifically are you referring to? If there was a link I apologise for missing it but this thread moves fast.

I am a recording engineer, and any computer effect you can use on a prerecorded snippet can be modified to affect a streaming recording too.


Not that I support this theory, but let's at least get our arguments accurate.
Click to expand...

I lost the link, but it was talking about Powell being 'captured' and so forth.

However, it mentioned only recorded messages. It never said anything about handling a live conversation that can handle multiple people.
 
MarkyX said:
I lost the link, but it was talking about Powell being 'captured' and so forth.

However, it mentioned only recorded messages. It never said anything about handling a live conversation that can handle multiple people.
Click to expand...


It wouldn't need to handle multiple people, it would just need to handle each source seperately.
 
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5861&view=findpost&p=5335376
jessicajohnstone said:
Well now My account has been validated by the Administrators at JREF... this is going to be interesting to say the least........

Oh wells what ever comes my way, I will not be backin down.....
boxing.gif
boxing.gif
Click to expand...
w00t!
 
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5861&view=findpost&p=5139400
chucksheen said:
CurtC, I am curious. Please respond honestly to the following.

Have you seen:

Who Killed John O'Neil?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=19...who+killed+john

Instead of worrying about people who don’t buy into the official story....
tell us why YOU’RE so blind....and can’t think for yourself.

WE are the crazy people???

Hey you believe THEIR wild story without even needing proof?!!!?

you see a plane in the Pentagon?
you see a plane in Shanksville?
wtc7 fell cause there was a FIRE in it?!?!
Both towers fell, at FREE FALL speed?
HOW do you know there were 19 terrorists? And don’t say "I watched the news"

You see, if you buy the 9/11 story, without one shred of proof, YOU my friends are the wack jobs.

So go ahead, attack the messenger, COMPLETELY ignore the message!!!!

No need to have chips planted in our heads to control our thoughts. We just watch the “news”.

When the whole world is protesting in the streets for 9/11 justice, you’ll be the last one with your head still in the sand.

So, what’s it like being a spook? Are you with MI5 or the CIA?

A few thousand spooks can’t control two billion internet users.

Your scoffing sounds more like the desperations of a dying regime.

Scoff all you like. No doubt you’ll fry in the chair with the rest of the culprits.

I’m sure the good folk of the US will reinstitute the electric chair when this can of worms is levered fully open.

The authorities didn’t factor the internet into their 9/11 conspiracy.

2 airplanes, 3 buildings. Someone at the CIA didn’t do their math when planning 9/11.

Even Hollywood does a better job than 9/11!!

The US authorities have much more resources than a bunch of fanatics in the Middle East.

Tonights bedtime story: Once upon a time there was a 9/11…

Power tends to corrupt. Just look at 9/11 for proof…

Santa, the Easter Bunny, 9/11,... some people will believe anything.

Talk about connecting the dots:

Who Killed John O'Neil?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=19...who+killed+john

Then when you are done with that don't rely on Loose Change, it's not the only documentary covering the inconsistancies. Checkout the following site and get all documentaries under your belt. If you are honest with yourself and watch them completely you will never believe the official 9/11 Cover Story again.

http://www.UniversalSeed.org - Inconvenient Truths
Click to expand...
Best chucksheen post ever...
 
chipmunk stew said:
Best chucksheen post ever...
Click to expand...

You see, that is why chuckie is upset with dubfan's spoof: it did not give him a reason to link his two most favorite things in the whole wide world (the John O'Neil movie and universalseed) and that made him grumpy.

So DJLegacy is now feeling the heat; wonder if it had anything to do with his sad performance over here...our maybe he should just change his name to Robspierre...
 
chipmunk stew said:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5861&view=findpost&p=5139400

Best chucksheen post ever...
Click to expand...

Anybody ever catalog all the major conspiracy theories on this, and who believes them? I mean, you got your "no planes" theorists, you got your planes into the WTC but not the Pentagon believers, you've got the LIHOP crowd, and I'm sure there are a couple out there who believe the only conspiracy was to cover up the shooting down of Flight 93. Then of course you've got who did it: the Neocons at PNAC, the Zionists, 19 hijackers duped by Tim Osmann, CIA agent. Chuck Sheen seems to think it's like a Chinese restaurant; you take one from column A, two from column B....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom