Hi flaccon,
As we found out very early in this thread, you use crappy equipment to listen to crappy recordings. Then you make out sentences on them that no one else hears, except your close associates, and it is far from evident that they hear what you hear.
The set-up you have for recording is incredibly unreliable. You make all the efforts you can muster to encourage glitches and noise. You are not familiar with the equipment you are using. You are not familiar with digital sound signals and how they behave. You are not familiar with pareidolia. You are not familiar with the scientific method of enquiry. You are not familiar with skeptics. How can you possibly be the one to explain the noises you end up with?
All we have so far are a few witnesses who are far from credible and some recordings, very many of which have been listened to by many skeptics, none of whom heard anything near what you allegedly heard.
Not that it would make much of a difference if we did. It would just mean we need to find out where on earth the order amid the noisy chaos comes from. The spirit world is not the first possible cause on the list. Far from it.
There is indeed what sounds like a man on the flaccon1 recording. Even if you don’t know who it is, it doesn’t mean he’s a spirit. Just because we can’t know who this person is, or how he was recorded, it doesn’t follow that he’s a spirit.
Unless someone comes along with a better idea, I impatiently await your video of yourself in action, doing whatever it is you do. If that fun little summer movie shows that your recordings are answering your questions, all that’s left is eliminating trickery and mundane explanations. Then you’re rich and you can build a real Edison machine.
But remember that the results cannot be open to interpretation. That is key.