I'm through justifying my sincerity.
Justifying it is not the same as taking action to show it.
There is a real difference between excuses and reasons.
Yes, reasons have reasoning, that's why they're called reasons.
What was the reasoning behind finishing a game of scrabble and then forgetting all about what you said you'd do after you'd finished your game of Scrabble?
Excuses simply excuse you from doing what you say you're going to do.
Would you chuck a loved one's voice all over the internet?
If I was claiming to have evidence that would mean that science and religion had to rethink their very foundations, I would do everything in my power to verify that my evidence was genuine. If I was simply seeking attention on the internet, I'd enjoy making the claims and promising
jam tomorrow.
I offered those with external sound, a file via email.
Yes and for reasons which are becoming more apparent I declined to give you my email address. I offered a viable easy and free alternative that would allow us both to remain objective.
Trust is a huge issue that has to work both ways.
No it doesn't. If people wish to blindly trust me then great, that doesn't mean that I have to blindly trust them. But let's take your logic and sway it around: Mistrust is a huge issue and it has to work both ways.
Now Soundcloud allows us both to mistrust or trust each other and move forward with examining the evidence you claim to have. The file only needs to be up there for an hour at the most, then you can delete it if you're not comfortable with it being there (not that anyone except you and anyone you personally told would even know about it).
However, if you're not willing to do that I'll accept that you're not willing to share the evidence for examination and that you made a mistake suggesting that you were. But if you're not willing to share the evidence and have it verified, stop citing it as proof of anything.
Seriously, I got more than I expected from this site. I am trusting a gentleman, with a good solid background, who will either say no, it is not worthy of further investigation, or yes, it's worthy.
I know you're convinced your evidence is conclusive but just what if he say's it's not worthy? Are you prepared to accept that or will you dismiss his opinion as easily as you dismissed our suggestions here on the forum?
Are you prepared to learn why it's not worthy?
I'd certainly be prepared to learn more about it if it turns out to be genuine spirit voices.