• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

Oliver said:
I don´t know. With all the crap he posts in here i can rarely imagine that he has time to post his crap elsewere. :boggled:
Click to expand...


LOL, he pointed me to this forum.
I was at a different forum and he posted a thread whining about this one, so I said to myself "if that place annoys him that much, it can't be too bad" So here I am.
 
Skibum said:
LOL, he pointed me to this forum.
I was at a different forum and he posted a thread whining about this one, so I said to myself "if that place annoys him that much, it can't be too bad" So here I am.
Click to expand...

Muhawawaw. That means he´s getting tired if he starts whining about us. :D


What thread was that?
 
DELICIOUS! :D


Christophera said:
There is a way to tell who is paid and who isn't, or at least get a good clue. Ordinary people do not have time or reason to monitor and counter data posted on BB's. Ordinary people DO NOT WORK TOGETHER. Admitted, the right wing has an agenda and will organize to a degree but when the integrity of the posted data is questioned as to it's support of illegal government, they most often back off. The ones that are not paid do not have a reason to fight the principles they deeply believe in and so will give up and go away.

I started arguing 9-11 in 2002 on courttv.com. There was average resistence from a number of posters. It was easy to tell they were cooperating, but, when I started talking about the US Constitution and its spiritual/sacred meanings, the opposition ususally reacted by stopping the BS opposition, or showing respect for my intentions and identifying them as their own. The hard core right might jump in every now and then to try and diss a point but it was brief and clear that there was minimal cooperation.

Now, anywhere you go (particuarly in the last year) there are at least a half dozen that are incessant with the confusion, distraction and bogus opposition. Bogus meaning; no evidence, selective use of evidence, unwillingness to recognize priorities of lawfulness in government, posting BS images to take up space and push relevant information off the last page. What gives away their cooperation is that they generally start this up at the same time, after their attempts to dismiss the information have failed, or when other genuine posters show agreement.

The worst I've ever seen is,

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=57426

randi.org is supposed to be a forum that honors intellectual pursuits and academic methods. However it appears as a debunkers toilet where undesireable concepts, (no matter how well evidenced) are quickly flushed (attempted) by a well organized and prepared group. It's easy to tell some are military people also. What is most obvious is that there is not one supporter on the thread. Usually there is at least one.

The thread I've linked to I started some weeks back, whereupon I was suspended for a few days for using hot links, now I'm suspended for reporting unreasonable posts taking up space on the thread. Opposition posting pictures of cats or baking recipes because they cannot produce a reasonable argument and mine are so compelling they must do something. That behavior is typical.

The site handicaps posters by requiring that images be uploaded and images over a certain size or having too long of a url are not accepted. the forum software has also set to not carry the quoted material upon reply. Meaning that a series of exchanges are not easy to keep coherent and show a history of errors, manipulations or deceptions.

LoneGunMan, thank for starting this thread. It is a service to truth, justice and liberty.
Click to expand...
 
Docker said:
Erm what about the parts of the building that are still standing?
Click to expand...

Better yet, what about the videos shot on site which show the walls bowing in, not exploding out, just as the building begins to fall?

What about the fact that no explosions are heard, even though the mics pick up voices and the deep rumbling of the collapse?

What about the fact that the debris patterns are consistent with collapse?

What about that, Docker?
 
There's no need for us to be "organized" and especially "prepared" to dismantle their bogus arguments, any more than sharks need to be "organized" and "prepared" to tear apart a wounded fish.

Any individual who reviews the evidence and thinks critically will be able to demonstrate the fatal flaws in this CT.

And now that all these unsupportable arguments have been reposted on this board so many times, we've seen them all, and seen their refutations, and read the relevant sources.

So when they do it yet again, of course we're all able, individually, to dismantle the thing.

They'd get the same result if they posted flat earth theory, Capricorn One, or geocentrism.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
think it was this:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2035592#post2035592
Click to expand...

You are correct and docker I apologies for my outburst at you. I accept you are not what I accused you of being.

You maybe delusional,slightly misguided and have a very seriously distorted view on humanity but other than that you seem a fairly reasonable individual.

Since I am on your ignore list you will never read this and never know how I have humbled myself before you and bowed before your superior intellect.

Oh well such is life, maybe you should leave your computer for a moment and get one.
 
Docker said:
Erm what about the parts of the building that are still standing?
Click to expand...
Doesn't that prove that the building was demolished by thermonuclear bombs, or Star-Wars like energy weapons? After all, cars burned on the front but not the back are supposed to prove that, right?
 
stateofgrace said:
I accept you are not what I accused you of being.
Click to expand...

I don't.

In my book, leveling unwarranted accusations at people of intentionally murdering 3000 innocent civilians... and persisting in this, even when your errors have been pointed out to you... that's vicious, and it's evil.

This CT is not some game. It's not some diversion, some reality-show episode.

People are being sucked into it. People who don't have time to check the facts are being persuaded by the CTers' media campaign that their government murdered thousands of its own people.

That's vicious, and it's evil.
 
Hey, Piggy. I missed Ducker's answer to your questiosn and have a hard time finding it in this thread. But I'm sure you have a direct link to his post? Could you please post it?
 
Christophera said:
OMG! Evidence of high explosives. Everybody must know it was a demoliton by now.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=3755&stc=1&d=1161801419
Click to expand...
You gotta love the use of the still-frame photograph by the CT crowd.

Yeah, I'll admit. If I didn't know what exactly was happening in that photograph, I'd say it kinda looks like the top section of the tower is exploding.

But it's quite clear what you're seeing when it's set in motion.
 
Christophera said:
OMG! Evidence of high explosives. Everybody must know it was a demoliton by now.
Click to expand...

Christophera, please view the 2 videos which have been linked on this thread.

When you do, I have a couple of questions for you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom