• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

Docker said:
Even in an earthquaske total collapse doesn't happen that way.
Click to expand...


That's because in an earthquake the foundations of the building are undermined and it collapsed bottom-up.

Much like a controlled demolition.

The buildings on 9/11, however, collapsed top-down, from the point of impact, as one would expect.

-Gumboot
 
Gravy said:
For the third time, what does NIST say was the mechanism of collapse? If you do not reply, we will assume you haven't bothered to learn.

In which universe? http://craneaccidents.com/bigblue.mpg

Which earthquake on 9/11 are you speaking of?

Present your evidence.

Oh, and what benefit are you getting out of your behavior here? You're just spewing crap. You are unable to back your claims with any evidence. It was explained to you as soon as you started posting here that arguments from personal incredulity hold no water with us.

So why are you doing this?

Just asking questions and demanding answers.
Click to expand...

You do not own these forums and I am braeking no rules.
 
Why, Docker?

How, Docker?

Is that what you're saying, Docker?
 
gumboot said:
That's because in an earthquake the foundations of the building are undermined and it collapsed bottom-up.

Much like a controlled demolition.

The buildings on 9/11, however, collapsed top-down, from the point of impact, as one would expect.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

Except building 7 that noone can understand the collapse of.
 
Docker said:
Except building 7 that noone can understand the collapse of.
Click to expand...


It makes sense to me. The building suffered far more extensive structural damage than either WTC1 or WTC2 (relative to overall building size) and far more extensive fires (again, relative to overall building size). If it's logical that WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed (I believe it is) it would be VERY odd if WTC7 DIDN'T collapse. Indeed - if WTC7 had NOT collapsed I would feel that would SUGGEST that NIST's analysis of WTC1 and WTC2 was wrong.

-Gumboot
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Please do not move the goalposts. This thread is discussing the picture you posted in the OP, not WTC 7.
Click to expand...

Just a thought... In the picture of the OP, we do see WTC7 very well, does anyone have seen a picture from the same photographer/same angle of the collapse of the second tower? does anybody know who that photographer is? It seems to me that if he/she took a picture of the second collapse, or even later, we would have a perfect view of the damage to WTC7.

carry on
 
gumboot said:
It makes sense to me. The building suffered far more extensive structural damage than either WTC1 or WTC2 (relative to overall building size) and far more extensive fires (again, relative to overall building size). If it's logical that WTC1 and WTC2 collapsed (I believe it is) it would be VERY odd if WTC7 DIDN'T collapse. Indeed - if WTC7 had NOT collapsed I would feel that would SUGGEST that NIST's analysis of WTC1 and WTC2 was wrong.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

And you dont think it's odd that no other building has ever collapsed due to fire. Your doing better than NIST, because they don't have a clue why 7 collapsed. They are even forced to investigate possible blast scenarios now.
 
I see the penthouse, Pardalis. You´re sure that this is 7?


11107453edf4a2df85.jpg
 
Docker said:
And you dont think it's odd that no other building has ever collapsed due to fire. Your doing better than NIST, because they don't have a clue why 7 collapsed. They are even forced to investigate possible blast scenarios now.
Click to expand...

You forgot the bit about the debris from the Towers dropping on top of it.

Besides the final report as not been published yet, so how do you know they haven't got a clue what caused WTC7 to collapse?
 
Why no boom?

Why did the walls bend inward?

Why does the debris pattern match a collapse?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom