Look at this collapse

[realitybites]

When did I ever claim it was a controlled demolition?

I'm sorry. You were being sincere in your opening thread when you stated:

Look at this simple gravity driven collapse. The steel simply weakened. There are no explosions involved. The concrete wasn't turned to dust.

....?

You weren't implying any nefarious wrong-doing there? Maybe hinting at controlled demo?

 

[Piggy]

Give it a rest, Piggy. He sees how stupid his assertions are and now is affraid to admit. Hence he doesn't answer. I asked him some questions six times, and still he didn't answer. It's a classic CT nutter tactic. Duck(er) and cover.

Look, Bell, I have an enquiring mind, ok? I won't be able to sleep until I find out. It's driving me crazy here. I've bitten my nails down to the quick. I gotta know what the man is saying! Don't you understand? Don't you have any mercy? Have you no feeling, man?!

 

[Mince]

Has anyone thought of mocking up the WTCs using Lincoln Logs (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_Logs) then simulating an aircraft impact and subsequent fire to see if and when the Lincoln Logs might collapse? All of this scientific and technological knowledge in the world and no one has thought of this?

 

[Docker]

I'm sorry. You were being sincere in your opening thread when you stated:


....?

You weren't implying any nefarious wrong-doing there? Maybe hinting at controlled demo?

Controlled demolition and planting bombs are veru different things.

 

[Pardalis]

What is your evidence that bombs were "planted" in the WTC towers and WTC7?

Show us.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

Controlled demolition and planting bombs are veru different things.

so you believe that a few randomly placed bombs could have the same effect as a planned demolition?

 

[DarkMagician]

Rough translation: oh dear, docker has a point

And it's his head.

 

[Docker]

so you believe that a few randomly placed bombs could have the same effect as a planned demolition?

It didnt look like a demolition, straw man.

 

[Pardalis]

Docker, what is your evidence that bombs were "planted" in the WTC towers and WTC7?

 

[Piggy]

Where's the boom, Docker?

If there were explosions, why no boom?

Why do the walls bend in on both videos?

Why is the debris pattern exactly what we would expect from a collapse?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

It didnt look like a demolition, straw man.

what kind of bombs were used? where were they planted? you must have at least some idea of the second one

 

[Mince]

O.k. O.k. Maybe using Lincoln Logs for a mock-up of the WTCs is inappropriate. After all, they are made of wood. But what about a mock-up using an Erector Set?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erector_Set

http://members.nucite.com/mem/1/thumbs_300/Erector41.jpg

Certainly the steel used in an Erector Set is very similar to the steel they used to Build WTC 1 and 2.

 

[Docker]

Docker, what is your evidence that bombs were "planted" in the WTC towers and WTC7?

The fact that they were totally destroyed.

 

[Piggy]

The fact that they were totally destroyed.

What? The bombs?

 

[Oliver]

Controlled demolition and planting bombs are veru different things.

Veru veru different things.

 

[Pardalis]

The fact that they were totally destroyed.

WOW!

 

[kookbreaker]

The fact that they were totally destroyed.

What do you mean by that? Why are bombs needed when collapse does the same thing?

 

[Piggy]

Veru veru different things.

Lighten up, Oliver. When a man's typing too fast to think, how can you expect him to be able to spell?

 

[Wowbagger]

The fact that they were totally destroyed.

Why can't passenger jets have destroyed them?

And, where are these explosives?

 

[kookbreaker]

Docker, what do you mean by 'totally destroyed' and have you calculated how much explosives would be needed to do so?