London Machete Attack, Conspiracies in...

A thread like this is a good placeholder, it keeps any conspiracy related stuff in one place rather than it springing up all over and having to be combined by the Mods.
 
A thread like this is a good placeholder, it keeps any conspiracy related stuff in one place rather than it springing up all over and having to be combined by the Mods.



I'll wait and see but in the tornado thread and so far in this thread, I have yet to see anyone actually spout and defend any conspiracy theories.
 
Yo.

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=50777

Those chappies at GOODF are at it again. This time they have the machete attack cleanly in their sights:

exactly HIS HANDS were covered in blood, what about the rest of him? he should have been absolutely splattered in blood if the jugular was cut blood would uncontrollably, squirt everywhere, AMAZING how it was just his hands? and the other guy dosn't seem to have a speck on him, this is VERY VERY ODD indeed.

Nice to see that they have given it a balanced, focussed and fair appraisal though. Having weighed up all the evidence (i.e. videos on youtube) they proudly conclude:

Definately False Flag, and there will be more, The only path they have is to escalate!

Jeepers.
 
"The Manchurian Candidate" theory is getting quite a workout in the London Machete attack Conspiracy theories.
 
Courtesy of Sharon Hill's Doubtful news, the most amazing thing...

Yesterday afternoon, Mother Jones writer Tim Murphy asked if Alex Jones’ InfoWars has ever concluded that a terrorist attack was actually committed by terrorists and not the government as a part of a “false flag” operation. Of course, Jones has blamed everything from 9/11 to the Boston Marathon Bombing to the tornado that devastated Oklahoma this week on secret government agents, so I was doubtful and had never seen it happen before. “There are no real flags left in this world, just false ones,” I responded.

It turns out I spoke a few hours too soon. This morning, Jones’ top lieutenant, Paul Watson, posted a video thoroughly debunking Internet rumors that the brutal killing of a British solider Wednesday outside London was a government hoax.
(Emphasis mine).

http://www.salon.com/2013/05/23/infowars_this_one_seems_legit/

http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/05/no-real-flags-just-false-ones-heh/
 

Yet another example of this foetid collection of oxygen wasters gleefully dancing round corpses. Is it too much to ask for one of them to become victims so they can see how it feels?

That thread is another example of why a 'should have gone to specsavers' thread is needed.

One poster crows triumphantly about spotting that grey railings suddenly become white railings in another shot. Clearly the railings have been photoshopped in. Except they are grey in both shots. There are countless examples of this on that forum as a whole, where some perfectly normal detail in a photo or video still is seized upon and denounced as manipulated fakery when in fact the only evidence to support such a claim is their lack of exposure to the outside world (for which I guess we can all be thankful).

Pond scum.
 
Yet another example of this foetid collection of oxygen wasters gleefully dancing round corpses. Is it too much to ask for one of them to become victims so they can see how it feels?

I'm sure other members of that sewer would label them a shill or actor/vicsim just like they do with everything else.
 
although personally I find the EDL/BNP/UKIP side of politics utterly distasteful I am glad no one has yet tried to claim they orchestrated this in order to trip off some race war, it is clear the murderers set out to kill using a fig leaf excuse of religion it is a possible conjecture that they might have killed under any pretext we never know now.
 
This conspiracy is really picking up speed now, I can't click on a single video on youtube about the Woolwich attack without seeing the comment section filled with people calling the whole thing 'staged' and 'fake'.
 
This conspiracy is really picking up speed now, I can't click on a single video on youtube about the Woolwich attack without seeing the comment section filled with people calling the whole thing 'staged' and 'fake'.

Even though I would have thought that the attackers made it quite clear why they were doing it, a motivation no different from that of any schoolyard bully.
 
Yet another example of this foetid collection of oxygen wasters gleefully dancing round corpses. Is it too much to ask for one of them to become victims so they can see how it feels?

That thread is another example of why a 'should have gone to specsavers' thread is needed.

One poster crows triumphantly about spotting that grey railings suddenly become white railings in another shot. Clearly the railings have been photoshopped in. Except they are grey in both shots. There are countless examples of this on that forum as a whole, where some perfectly normal detail in a photo or video still is seized upon and denounced as manipulated fakery when in fact the only evidence to support such a claim is their lack of exposure to the outside world (for which I guess we can all be thankful).

Pond scum.

Yep I tried to register(for a second time) just to point this out! It would have been pointless of course. Bunch of knuckle scraping goons. They make statements such as "that roadsign wouldnt have caused that damage to the car etc." Like they are experts on every subject! Some berk is now stating the whole thing never happened!
If I ever met anyone from that forum Id have to bang their head against a wall severely until they got some sense.
 
I'll wait and see but in the tornado thread and so far in this thread, I have yet to see anyone actually spout and defend any conspiracy theories.

Why do you need anyone to do so? This forum is a place to discuss things like conspiracies, not simply to argue with people who actually support them themselves. The great thing about the internet is that you can link to things on other sites without anyone needing to come here and say it all in person. As several posts in this thread show, people absolutely are coming up with all kinds of silly conspiracy claims about the attack. Where better to discuss, or simply bring them to light, than here?
 
Why do you need anyone to do so? This forum is a place to discuss things like conspiracies, not simply to argue with people who actually support them themselves. The great thing about the internet is that you can link to things on other sites without anyone needing to come here and say it all in person. As several posts in this thread show, people absolutely are coming up with all kinds of silly conspiracy claims about the attack. Where better to discuss, or simply bring them to light, than here?



Someone had specifically mentioned that these threads save mods time because true believers would derail other threads with their conspiracy theorizing. That it didn't happen was the reason I brought it up.
 
Yet another example of this foetid collection of oxygen wasters gleefully dancing round corpses. Is it too much to ask for one of them to become victims so they can see how it feels?

That thread is another example of why a 'should have gone to specsavers' thread is needed.

One poster crows triumphantly about spotting that grey railings suddenly become white railings in another shot. Clearly the railings have been photoshopped in. Except they are grey in both shots. There are countless examples of this on that forum as a whole, where some perfectly normal detail in a photo or video still is seized upon and denounced as manipulated fakery when in fact the only evidence to support such a claim is their lack of exposure to the outside world (for which I guess we can all be thankful).

Pond scum.

Their inability to understand the basics of photography is mind blowing. In the same set as those grey railings they point out that in one photo a woman has a hand and in the next she does not! Completely missing the fact that her body is blocking the view of her hand.

Then they zoom into any photo until they get to point where they can yell, "Pixels!!!"

Yep I tried to register(for a second time) just to point this out! It would have been pointless of course. Bunch of knuckle scraping goons. They make statements such as "that roadsign wouldnt have caused that damage to the car etc." Like they are experts on every subject! Some berk is now stating the whole thing never happened!
If I ever met anyone from that forum Id have to bang their head against a wall severely until they got some sense.

I have tried to register several times with no luck. I doubt my membership would last more than a few hours. My favorite are their claims about blood. How much there should be, what color, texture.
 
Yesterday over at Delusional Idiots Forum the discussion turned on the release of the suspects from the hospital. The main notion was that people shot with "dum dum" bullets (an inaccurate description of modern hollowpoints) would, if they even survived getting shot with such "illegal and cruel" things would hardly be in good enough shape to be released by now.

As if the suspects couldn't be released to spend jail time on a medical bed in a cell . . .

A lot of instant experts out there.
 
Their inability to understand the basics of photography is mind blowing. In the same set as those grey railings they point out that in one photo a woman has a hand and in the next she does not! Completely missing the fact that her body is blocking the view of her hand.

Then they zoom into any photo until they get to point where they can yell, "Pixels!!!"

I have tried to register several times with no luck. I doubt my membership would last more than a few hours. My favorite are their claims about blood. How much there should be, what color, texture.

BIB : You have to agree that no-one died on 9/11 to stay on the forum :rolleyes:
 

Back
Top Bottom