• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

London lesbians beaten for not kissing

IT'S FUNNY, GET IT HA HA HA

He's saying jerkish things but if that makes you think he's a jerk, that's just you being stupid and falling for it because that's what he WANTED you to think all along! The only way not to be a loser is to let his jerky statements stand without any reaction whatsoever!

Is a conversational style that doesn't lend itself to text as well as speech. I'm sure in person the tone and body kamasutra would have made it more clear it was a sarcastic point.
 
OK then.

Thanks much for the clarification.

Perhaps if you and/or 'Cain' were badly beaten and robbed, then you would find that to be most amusing as well.

Don't put that challange out there because some people can and will pick it up. I've been through some **** but have no problem joking about it, I follow the Jewish logic of "if you don't laugh you cry".

If you want the poster to be more sensitive just ask,because if they are anything like me they very well could get beaten and robed and be joking about it hours later. I was cracking " the score is now 1 to 10 billion" to a mildly racist friend of a friend who tried to use the fact I hit mugged by poc as evidence of the criminal nature of those types.
 
But I still don't know what it means. Am I supposed to suddenly hate something, or what?

The Mail are fishing for anything they can get about the victims to try to give the story legs. Presumably this story will run at least until the perpetrators are identified and tracked down, so it needs filler until that happens. In the meantime, any salacious gossip or titillating detail they can buy will be spun into another day's story about the victims. They're lesbians: any relationship history the paper can unearth, however mundane, will be spun to sound as titillating as possible.

These women are not just the victims of a violent attack, their lives have now been fed into the tabloid machine and they're going to suffer a couple of weeks of stories that even they will scarcely recognise as referring to themselves.
 
How long before it turns out to be a hoax? Just putting this here so a) I can seem super smart when it is and/or b) as a reminder to not get all het up and diatribaceous on things like media coverage, fetishes, busses, etc until you are sufficiently certain this isn't another of those times that we keep having multiple times a year now.

Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't, but surely the sensible course is to temper one's response in accordance with the solidity of the evidence. Otherwise one could bust a gasket for no reason.
 
Wow!

Are you actually blaming the victims of the crime for the crime itself?
Yeah it's our fault for misreading the thing he literally just said.

And if he's not some try-hard will be along any minute to actually make that argument.
IT'S FUNNY, GET IT HA HA HA

He's saying jerkish things but if that makes you think he's a jerk, that's just you being stupid and falling for it because that's what he WANTED you to think all along! The only way not to be a loser is to let his jerky statements stand without any reaction whatsoever!

Google a word called "satire" or "parody"
 
Google a word called "satire" or "parody"

Oh sod all the way off with that "Schrodinger's *******" argument.

There's more to satire and parody then just being an inappropriate troll and declaring victory when people are annoyed by it.

Again when someone takes a crap in the salad bar he's not "winning" when people get upset over it.
 
If you tire of a particular poster's recurring schtick use the ignore button. I'm sure plenty of people tired of my nonsense and acted accordingly.
 
If you tire of a particular poster's recurring schtick use the ignore button. I'm sure plenty of people tired of my nonsense and acted accordingly.

If you're tired of me complaining about it, ignore me. You can ignore me in perfect 1:1 ratio of me ignoring them.

And yes that will be my response every time someone tells me to ignore a troll.
 
Last edited:
Beaten bloody and also robbed. One man spoke Spanish and the other three had British accents. They should be identified with all the security cameras around.


Ryanair stewardess tells how gang of men battered and mugged her and her girlfriend on a London bus 'after pair refused to kiss for their entertainment' - as police probe 'homophobic attack'



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ple-covered-blood-gang-men-attacked-them.html

Anyone else got a transient guilty feeling that crossed their mind reading this that anyone associated with Ryanair gets what they deserve? Intellectually I know she is probably treated appallingly by her employer probably even worse than customers; and I should feel sorry for her.

Indeed I do feel sorry once I look at the picture. I think I'll go and have a cry and put TRB on very loud.
 
Some suspects have been arrested.

Four teenage boys aged between 15 and 18 have been arrested after a Ryanair flight attendant and her girlfriend were punched and robbed by a gang of men on a London bus when they refused to kiss.

If the ones arrested are the ones who did it, send them to prison.

What an awful situation. I hope they got the right ones though. (remembering the "central park five")
 
Anyone else got a transient guilty feeling that crossed their mind reading this that anyone associated with Ryanair gets what they deserve? Intellectually I know she is probably treated appallingly by her employer probably even worse than customers; and I should feel sorry for her.

Indeed I do feel sorry once I look at the picture. I think I'll go and have a cry and put TRB on very loud.

Why is that? What is Ryanair anyway? An airline, I gather, but is there something particularly objectionable about this airline?
 
London has more cameras than the tourist area of Chicago.

In other words, they know exactly who got on and off that bus at certain times.

We can be sure of this because of the Jussie Smollett case.
 
Why is that? What is Ryanair anyway? An airline, I gather, but is there something particularly objectionable about this airline?

Ryanair is one of those ultra-budget, "no frills almost to the point of it being an intentional affect" kind of airlines and they often pop up in the news for some super-stupid cost cutting measure (they for instance tried to save money by ordering their aircraft without window shades but were stymied by various regulations) or for that kind of "You almost have to be doing it on purpose" kind of bad customer service, like refusing industry standard bereavement fairs or adding a surcharge if a passenger needed a wheelchair.
 
Last edited:
You both have been on this forum for a very long time and are very familiar with Cain's Poe posting style so I am surprised at your outrage.

But back on topic. This is truly horrible and I hope the criminals get the book thrown at them.
Yeah, that's why Ive got that guy on ignore.:mad:
 
Ryanair is one of those ultra-budget, "no frills almost to the point of it being an intentional affect" kind of airlines and they often pop up in the news for some super-stupid cost cutting measure (they for instance tried to save money by ordering their aircraft without window shades but were stymied by various regulations) or for that kind of "You almost have to be doing it on purpose" kind of bad customer service, like refusing industry standard bereavement fairs or adding a surcharge if a passenger needed a wheelchair.

Well, as long as they pass those savings along to the customer, arguably that's fair. But no reason to hate the poor people just trying to make a living.
 
Well, as long as they pass those savings along to the customer, arguably that's fair. But no reason to hate the poor people just trying to make a living.

Agreed that regardless of what their parent company does it does not translate into actions such as these against employees being acceptable.

ETA: Which to be fair is not what I think Planigale was going for either.
 
The Mail are fishing for anything they can get about the victims to try to give the story legs. Presumably this story will run at least until the perpetrators are identified and tracked down, so it needs filler until that happens. In the meantime, any salacious gossip or titillating detail they can buy will be spun into another day's story about the victims. They're lesbians: any relationship history the paper can unearth, however mundane, will be spun to sound as titillating as possible.

These women are not just the victims of a violent attack, their lives have now been fed into the tabloid machine and they're going to suffer a couple of weeks of stories that even they will scarcely recognise as referring to themselves.
I was thinking that this was the way for Daily Mail to publish meaningful support for the victims. Right after the Jussie Smollett incident there were friends and family and coworkers who had quotes published in the media. Essentially letters of support, sympathy and hopes for justice. That can't really happen unless these people connect with reporters.
 
How long before it turns out to be a hoax? Just putting this here so a) I can seem super smart when it is and/or b) as a reminder to not get all het up and diatribaceous on things like media coverage, fetishes, busses, etc until you are sufficiently certain this isn't another of those times that we keep having multiple times a year now.

Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't, but surely the sensible course is to temper one's response in accordance with the solidity of the evidence. Otherwise one could bust a gasket for no reason.

If the ladies had fought off the gang of boys with one hand while holding a subway sandwich in the other, as the boys yelled some corny political slogan at them, it probably would have made me pause.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom