• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Logical proof of ZPT invalidity

Reality Check

Penultimate Amazing
R
Joined
Mar 2, 2008
Messages
28,521
Location
New Zealand
There is a thread on the forum called Logical proof of SRT invalidity started by ozziemate.
IMHO: There are a few things wrong with what he has presented (400 posts and no actual logical proof presented yet!). But I will present one for his education by applying his logic to his pet idea (zero point theory).

Note that this is an idea of his only. There is no mathematics or physics involved in it. Just a web site with pseudo-science language and pretty pictures. The basic premises that he has presented here are:
  • Light does not travel (distance is zero for light).
  • All detectors act exactly as if light travels and report the distance to the source of the light to observers.
  • We exist in a 4-dimensional spacetime but light exists a zero-dimensional spacetime and gravity in a 3-dimensional spacetime.
So let us apply ozziemate's logic to zero point theory.
  • Assume that light travels (i.e. distance is not zero for light).
  • A theory that states that light does not travel is thus invalid.
  • Zero point theory assumes that light does not travel.
  • Thus zero point theory is invalid. :jaw-dropp
 
Reality Check said:
So you either
Which is it?
Click to expand...
Firstly as you well know Zero point theory has yet to be created.
Secondly How can I admit my logic for ZPT is wrong when it hasn't been formalised into a hypothesis let alone a theory yet.
Thirdly, The logical proof of SRT invalidity is about to be presented after an exhausting 500 pages of mostly flaming and harrassment by yourself and others.
Fourthly, Instead of dealing with the issues at hand you have constantly been attempting to derail proper discussion due to your absolute blind faith in a theory that is under question.
Sorry Reality Check for threatening your comfort zone so much but hey that's life....
 
ozziemate said:
uhm.... but wait there's more....
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4156501#post4156501

sorry RealityCheck but your vendetta is about to finish....:)
Click to expand...


A vendetta, what a chump you are!

RC has not gone on a vendetta against you, just further proof that you are arrogant, clueless and a poseur.

delusions of grandeur.

You are just like some religous fanatic who can't take a critique so you make it personal.

Looser! i will keep reading but you are hopeless.

RC has been very polite to you by the standards of the forum.
 
ozziemate said:
Firstly as you well know Zero point theory has yet to be created.
Secondly How can I admit my logic for ZPT is wrong when it hasn't been formalised into a hypothesis let alone a theory yet.
Thirdly, The logical proof of SRT invalidity is about to be presented after an exhausting 500 pages of mostly flaming and harrassment by yourself and others.
Fourthly, Instead of dealing with the issues at hand you have constantly been attempting to derail proper discussion due to your absolute blind faith in a theory that is under question.
Sorry Reality Check for threatening your comfort zone so much but hey that's life....
Click to expand...
Are you saying that zero point energy does not include that light does not travel (distance is zero for light)?

What are its premises or posulates then?

ETA:
Forget about it. If it does not exist at all then you probably do not have premises or posulates and so this thread is even sillier than your distance is zero for light thread (aka Proof of the photon that is unambiguous?)
 
Last edited:
Why can't I help but feel the OP is a PM to a few people that somehow got posted on the forums?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom