Actually, from a purely philosophical standpoint, Lifegazer's idea that "everything is subjective and from the mind, and therefore physics can be made up as I go along" philosophy is something of a paradox, isn't it? Following that sort of notion to its logical conclusion, I discovered through contemplation that Lifegazer cannot support his general philosophy while also making any specific claims, since a specific claim would imply an objective reality that he claims doesn't exist.
Even if that doesn't make sense, it is still perfectly valid, because it came from my mind, right? Since your views are subjective, you can no more call me wrong than I can say Lifegazer is wrong.
Even if that doesn't make sense, it is still perfectly valid, because it came from my mind, right? Since your views are subjective, you can no more call me wrong than I can say Lifegazer is wrong.