Liberal Discover Second Amendment

[skeptifem]

Gee, I didn't know the word "liberal" was an insult. I was only laughing at them.

My years of experience with self professed liberals on the net indicate an extremely high degree of alarmism, pacifism, socialism, blame america-ism, and CTs with a total disregard for tangible evidence. Perhaps it's different here?

yeah there are a lot of quality people here, even the less tolerable ones are not as bad as people i have met on other boards.

theres a lot of nutters out there, its important to remember that the majority of people are not completely liberal or conservative, most people just lean one way or the other. I think there are more libertarians here than on most boards. But debating things here wont be the same as most other places where political discussions are encouraged- check out the conspiracy theories board for an example. Evidence of what is said is valued here.

 

[Cain]

I've seen more and more such articles in the last year. _The New Republic_ similarly described this phenomenon weeks ago, but instead used it as a jumping off point to argue for abolishing the Second Amendment and implementing a complete ban on handguns.

 

[fuelair]

Gee, I didn't know the word "liberal" was an insult. I was only laughing at them.

My years of experience with self professed liberals on the net indicate an extremely high degree of alarmism, pacifism, socialism, blame america-ism, and CTs with a total disregard for tangible evidence. Perhaps it's different here?

Odd, I am a Bush loathing liberal. I think CT'ers are insane, own guns and other useful weapons, have no problem with war that is A)necessary and B) carried out properly (hard, fast, won), support helping people - especially our troops and people honestly in need. sorry I don't meet your criterion for a liberal. Silly me!! Oh, what am I alarmed with, by the by(other than that shrub rectum).

 

[Ladewig]

I'm not a conservative nor a liberal - but liberals have an intelligent debate? LOL, I had enough of "intelligent" (more like circular, repetitive) debate with them over whether or not a missile, or another object, struck the pentagon. (at another board which identifies as 89% liberal biased) Incidentally, over 80% of those self professed liberals voted in the poll that "no way a plane struck the pentagon"

This is priceless. Which "liberal" board are you referring to?

I want to know, too. Which board was it?

 

[WildCat]

I want to know, too. Which board was it?

If I had to guess, I'd say this one.

 

[SRW]

After 200 and more years of shelping from the first to third amendments with out a second thought, more and more Liberal Law professors have discovered the Second Amendment protected an individual right and not a collective right.

Says Lauernce H Tribe , a low professor at Harvard, My conclusion came as something of a surprise to me, an unwelcome surprise, "tribe said,"I have always supported as a matter of policy very comprehensive gun control." The Devel in the details, liberals have always over looked the details of the Second amendment, A well Regulated militia, being necessary to th e security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed. As a Matter of consistency liberals who see a broad reading of other a broad reading of other amendment should also embrace a broad reading of this one.

Adam Liptak New York Times

My Sister went in for surgery today; so last night Steve took an ambien. Bad Steve, there was a real good post about change and shifting of views but instead every one gets treated to this...well garbage. I am not really a conservative I only play one when I am not thinking.

From now on:

1. Turn off computer.

2. Take sleeping pill.

3. Go to bed.

She is fine now, I go in tomorrow to get my head removed from my ass.

 

[Wolfman]

SRW -- I've been there, too. Few months ago, made a rather rambling and embarassing post after coming home from a night of rather excessive alcohol consumption. Having to apologize or give excuses after the fact only makes it harder...but the smart ones among us learn from our mistakes, right?

And I agree...the article itself is interesting.

 

[The Great Hairy One]

...I go in tomorrow to get my head removed from my ass.

Good on you mate. Takes a big person to admit their mistakes.

Cheers,
TGHO

 

[Schneibster]

Conservatives Yet To Discover Grammar and Logic

My goodness...what a terribly unreadable piece of work. I read it through four or five times, hoping to figure it out, but other than the generally safe assumption that it is an attack on "Liberal" support for gun control, I really can't make heads or tails of the rest of it.

And this was written for the New York Times?!? I REALLY hope not; I'd rather assume it is a semi-literate attempt at summarizing an article that they only dimly understood to begin with.

Actually, to be properly condescending toward the admittedly primitive writing style, might one not more properly use, "Conservative Not Discover Grammar, still having trouble with other thing despite extensive use of mirror and both hands?" After all, it was written by only one of them, as far as I can tell.

 

[Schneibster]

My Sister went in for surgery today; so last night Steve took an ambien. Bad Steve, there was a real good post about change and shifting of views but instead every one gets treated to this...well garbage. I am not really a conservative I only play one when I am not thinking.

Ah. My goodness, I've never taken Ambien and I suspect that I never will now. THERE'S a side effect for you.

 

[Tricky]

Odd, I am a Bush loathing liberal. I think CT'ers are insane, own guns and other useful weapons, have no problem with war that is A)necessary and B) carried out properly (hard, fast, won), support helping people - especially our troops and people honestly in need. sorry I don't meet your criterion for a liberal. Silly me!! Oh, what am I alarmed with, by the by (other than that shrub rectum).

Then you're not a "true liberal". That's what I've been told when I say the same sort of thing. People like us really screw up their filing system.

 

[The Central Scrutinizer]

After 200 and more years of shelping from the first to third amendments with out a second thought, more and more Liberal Law professors have discovered the Second Amendment protected an individual right and not a collective right.

Says Lauernce H Tribe , a low professor at Harvard, My conclusion came as something of a surprise to me, an unwelcome surprise, "tribe said,"I have always supported as a matter of policy very comprehensive gun control." The Devel in the details, liberals have always over looked the details of the Second amendment, A well Regulated militia, being necessary to th e security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed. As a Matter of consistency liberals who see a broad reading of other a broad reading of other amendment should also embrace a broad reading of this one.

Adam Liptak New York Times

Ummmm.......what???

 

[SRW]

Me too