"Liberal" ACLU Helping defend Rush Limbaugh

[TillEulenspiegel]

I remember Skokie very well, and I don't consider the ACLU's defense of the Nazis in that case as a good thing. The case was mooted anyway when the city of Chicago allowed them to march in the parks there again. That's what started the whole thing. Once Chicago let them back in, they canceled their Skokie march.

Ya they marched in Marquette Park. I yelled insults at them ,
some other people got rather more violent.

They weren't really defending the Nazis, Luke rather the right of free speech.

edit:
Luke :"believe the guy who was leading the Nazis in their attempt to march in Skokie was shortly thereafter arrested as a pedophile"

O god Frank Collin...that guy was a piece of work wasn't he? He was Jewish BTW HAHAHAHAHA

 

[Luke T.]

Uh oh....here we go again. It's been awhile hasn't it?

Sorry, people is the people. The word people is deliberate. Had the framers intended to give the right to the state it would have said the state. It didn't. It said "people". The word "people" has a specific and important meaning as it is used in the Bill of Rights. But let's debate it. I'm on solid ground by saying that the people actually means the people and not just the National Guard.

What is sad is that those who make this argument have never read the writtings of the framers during that time. The meaning of "people" is not really a matter of debate. But that is fine. We can make it one if you want to.

It is also worth noting a state's national guard can be federalized.

 

[Virgil]

Many state also have a state guard which cannot be federalized.


Virgil

 

[Dancing David]

Many state also have a state guard which cannot be federalized.


Virgil

Um, the last I heard the national gaurd could not be with held by a govenor over the wishes of the president. I think it was the Govenor of Wisconsin vs regan in the genada thing.

But perhaps you are making reference to bodies outside of the traditional state militias.

 

[Virgil]

Um, the last I heard the national gaurd could not be with held by a govenor over the wishes of the president. I think it was the Govenor of Wisconsin vs regan in the genada thing.

But perhaps you are making reference to bodies outside of the traditional state militias.

no, I am refering to the State Guards, not the National Guards.

http://www.sgaus.org/

ca 19 states have legal state millitas. this link might help.

A bill just went through congress re-affirming them and increasing their role in homeland security.



Virgil