• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

LC Forum back up

The_Fire said:
Avery stole that background image from the Naudet DVD.........
Click to expand...

No surprise. I haven't seen any evidence that he's ever had an original thought or idea in his life thusfar.
 
That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC.

Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me.

Even with his little disclaimer he has now.
 
Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me.

Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand?
 
sivazh said:
Oh, and about having to register to view the forum, sounds like a numbers ploy to me.

Avery can go around bragging, "Oh, we have X number of people registered at the forum." But, how many are hardcore posters and believers in the "troof?" And how many just registered because they want to read the wackiness first hand?
Click to expand...
On the plus side, how many "undecideds" are going to bother registering? I suspect this means that the forum will mostly only be read by skeptics and true believers.
 
Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here?

I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written.

Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also.

I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away.
 
Matthew Best said:
Is there any chance that the resurrection of the LC forum means that we will lose some of our more annoying conspiraloons here?

I only ask because I'm starting to find this forum too depressing to visit. For months after I started coming here I found it interesting, educational, occasionally very funny, and full of intelligent points well-argued and well-written.

Recently it seems like we're just constantly fighting back a tide of idiocy put forward by the likes of Killtown and Puberty. Their sort of gibberish and nonsense was quite amusing when posted elsewhere - as long as I could come here and feel cleansed by reading some comparative common sense, but now it seems the waters here have been polluted also.

I'm not usually in favour of banning, but I sure wish they'd go away.
Click to expand...

When they do eventually leave or do something stupid to get banned you'll miss them in the end :p

I miss reading Stimpy and UpChurch (and horde) pimp Franko :( :D :D
 
sivazh said:
That's one thing I wasn't ever able to understand about LC.

Avery didn't ask for permission for any graphics, footage, pictures, anything when he first made the "documentary." He basically just put it all together and put it online, right? He received numerous cease and decist letters from organizations and individuals, but somehow it survived. That sounds like the conspiracy to me.

Even with his little disclaimer he has now.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... I am aware the Naudet Brothers took the cease and desist approach, but I haven't heard about any of the others taking similar action.

I could be wrong, of course. I haven't really looked into it.

I recently added a "citation needed" tag to the Wikipedia entry on LC, because the introduction states that the next version of LC has been delayed because of copyright concerns. Copyright has never bothered these guys before, and Dylan is on record as stating that LC3 is nowhere near being finished. Doesn't sound like copyright problems to me...
 
It looks awful in there, a real eye sore.And as for Dylans avator, what a joke.

I have registered to have a look but can't see me posting on the new super duper forum.
 

​
No problem here
angelic002.gif


​
 
Interesting thread at the new LC

"Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned.

Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions?

Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM


For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned?

i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner.

if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong.

will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly?

Some replies...

"...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite."

"Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes,
that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the
best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets,
including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even
ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters!
As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a
plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage."

This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up.

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."


Sheesh.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=72
 
Calcas said:
"Popeholden" started an interesting thread asking if skeptics will automatically be banned.

Re: The New Forums, will people be banned for opinions?

Popeholden Posted: Oct 19 2006, 05:29 PM


For instance, if i happen to not believe in the conspiracy, and post evidence toward this end, but i do it respectfully and nicely, am i going to be banned?

i'm sure you know this forum has a pretty bad track record of stifling dissent, and i'd like to think a community of truth seekers wouldn't mind the presentation of a different opinion, as long as it's presented in a respectful manner.

if i am banned, i would very much appreciate an e-mail message explaining exactly what i've done wrong.

will people who insult me or accuse me of being a government agent be punished accordingly?

Some replies...

"...the point I'm simply trying to make is this. People who already have their mind made up about their views on 9/11 have no real place in a 9/11 Truth Forum. What legitimate purpose do you serve the members of this board if you provide nothing but the opposite."

"Maybe you could ask yourselve, if it is not also a 'conspiracy theory' when one claimes,
that 19 amateurs with boxcutters manage to highjack 4 jetliners and cruise around in the
best protected airspace of all times and also manage then to hit 3/4 of their targets,
including the nerve-center of the mightiest miltary force of the planet whithout even
ONE F-16 appearing at the horizon? Hello? I mean: Boxcutters!
As Prof. Fetzer said: Americans are fairly agressive. Imagine 4 Arabs with boxcutters in a
plane full of Americans... They would have beaten them to death with their luggage."

This last poster, "Victoria" pretty much sums it up.

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."


Sheesh.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=72
Click to expand...



Ahh but what if the TRUTH is that the Truth Movement is FALSE?? :eek:

Really, this house of cards that Dylan et al have built has already been "pulled" by Mr. Realitystein. But they still have their delusional mindset to keep them warm.

-z
 
LC freedom from truth policy

"I think you shouldn't put anything that has to do with skeptics here.I think this is all about the TRUTH, we shouldn't be talking about something else than that."
Click to expand...

This one statement if made in to LC forum rules, will essecially ban all those who believe the LC video from posting on the LC forum?

LC forum shut down today after all posting was suspended for lack of truth. Do we need to wait until Dylan finally tells everyone his work of fiction is still a work of fiction or does he think he can sell another 100,000 DVDs?

Who buys his DVDs?

Thanks for the post on the insides of a not so first admentment run site!

now I need to read how to post quotes and cite the proper poster
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom