LC Final Insult Teaser !110001!!1

jhunter1163 said:
He limited his franchising to one payment that is likely to be recovered by Virgin unless they decide that it's not worth their trouble to sue for. If they paid him $10K for rights, and it'll cost them $20K in legal fees to recover it, they'll write it off as a bad decision. And, frankly, I'd be surprised if they got as much as $10K, considering the tiny audience it would have drawn.
Click to expand...

Assuming, of course, that this contract between Dylan Avery and Virgin even exists. As I said elsewhere, I doubt that it does.
 
Someone on the Loose Change forum apparently likes my work (I've color coded the uncanny similarities:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8587&st=100&#last

Originally posted by Mince (in this thread)

That is exactly my perspective. Avery got paid one time, and now the video is tainted, just ahead of the Final Cut's release, no less.

Dylan, you're not likely to get paid again for screening rights to Second Edition. Your franchise horse dropped dead out of the gate. How are you ahead 1-0? You got paid one time. You're laughing because you limited your franchising of Second Edition to one payment.
Click to expand...
by BillW (at Loose Change forum)

I think this may have much broader repurcussions.

Dylan got paid one time, and now the video is tainted, just ahead of the Final Cuts release, no less.

I dont think its likely he will get paid again for screening rights to Second Edition. And thats the franchise horse.

He limited his franchising to one payment that is likely to be recovered by Virgin unless they decide that its not worth their trouble to sue for. If they paid him $10K for rights, and it will cost them $20K in legal fees to recover it, they will write it off as a bad decision. And, frankly, I would be surprised if they got as much as $10K, considering the tiny audience it would have drawn.
Click to expand...

Also on the Loose Change forum:

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8646


by a curious person

Will we be seeing this teaser distributed and promoted? Perhaps on TV or in theaters?
Click to expand...

by Dylan Avery

Nope. This is something I made for the fans.
Click to expand...

That's right. We won't be seeing a trailer on TV or in theaters because, guess what, it's not going to be on TV or in theaters.

Also note Avery's use (again) of the word "fans".
 
Last edited:
soundaddicted said:
Im glad to see the Mineta testimony is in there. Not many people are even aware of that.
Click to expand...
It would be cool if some truther could tell anyone what it means. What does Mineta testimony mean? So far not a single truther can come up with any facts about 9/11 to prove their ideas.

Just old junk and more lies appear to be LCFC destiny. No facts and evidence just hearsay and misleading information. Dylan is hoping to make money from people not able to think for themselves. What do you think?
 
Last edited:
Are these idiots making money from this? I am hoping not, but won't be surprised if they cash in a good profit from this conspiracy movie. I hate people.
 
Here is a LCF poster who does not understand LCSE is fiction. He is still fooled by Dylan's lies. Why has this guy failed to understand what facts really are, as have Virgin employees who have been tipped off about the lies of LC.

He emails Virgin.
Here's my letter,

To Virgin Atlantic Management
CC: Chairman Virgin Atlantic Airways; Chairman and CEO Virgin Group, Sir Richard Branson
CEO, Steve Ridgway
COO, Lyell Strambi
VP Sales and Marketing, Chris Rossi

I noticed that Loose Change has been removed from the in-flight entertainment selection. It is regretful to hear that you have removed a documentary that is fact based and asks questions about the details of what happened on one of America's most horrific days. Whoever complained and forced its removal obviously has something to hide.

I applaud the company's original decision to make this documentary available for customer viewing. I am also hopeful management will reconsider its decision to pull it from the available rotation.

Regards,
Click to expand...
 
soundaddicted said:
Mineta can't be referring to flight 93. It wasn't reported to the military until 10:06am. I think it's an important piece of evidence.
Click to expand...



United 93 wasn't reported to the military until 10:07.

By your logic it cannot be AA77 either, since that wasn't reported to the military until 09:34.

Indeed, Mineta claims that the conversation took place at 0925, yet at 0925 AA77 was 70 miles from the White House, at 16,500ft at 330kts.

AA77 did not reach 50 miles from the White House until 0927, and first came within 10 miles of the White House at 0934.

I now have my suspicions that Mineta could be right about the time this conversation happens.

He claims it happened at 0925, and that the Langley fighters had just been scrambled to intercept this aircraft. The Langley fighters were scrambled at 0922 - but not to intercept AA77. They were scrambled to intercept AA11.

Two alternatives:

At 0921 Boston Centre reported to NEADS that AA11 was still airbourne and headed for Washington DC. The F-16s from Langley were scrambled to intercept.

Based on an airspeed of 300kts (last know airspeed of AA11) and last known position north of Manhattan, AA11 would have reached Washington DC at about 0930.

The first alternative is that the reports were the projected path of an aircraft that had already crashed into the WTC. This is conflicted by the official version of when the shoot down order was given, and when the full evacuation of the White House occured.

The second alternative is that Mineta's timeline is wrong and the conversation was about a projected flight path for UA93.

UA93 crashed at 1003, 130 miles from the White House.

For the last part of UA93's flight, before it began to fly erratically, the FDR indicates an airspeed of about 295Kts.

At this speed, UA93 would have reached the White House just before 1030.

Just before 1020, UA93 would have been 50 miles from the White House. It would have been 10 miles away at 1023. This matches nearly perfectly with the official time for the shoot down order being issued. This matches neatly with the full evacuation of the White House.

-Gumboot
 
Gamolon said:
Ok, let me get this straight.

The all powerful and evil government just pulled off the conspiracy of the ages using carefully laid out plans which, I may add, include the planting of all kinds of evidence and paying off hundreds of people...

...and here's the kicker folks....

Only to be exposed by a movie produce by a couple of kids?

Wouldn't they put a stop to that?
Click to expand...

What are you, some kind of shill or something? Don't you understand Da Rules? No matter how vast, all-powerful, evil, ruthless, and perfectly executed a conspiracy is, it must have some flaws in it that completely escape every expert in the world but are somehow totally obvious to lonely little boys who use their copious free time sorting through stray pixels on YouTube. It's like that rule that says once a supervillian has the only person who can stop him in his clutches, he cannot just shoot him or anything, he has to devise some really complicated, time-consuming means of execution, and then promptly leave the room so the hero can escape and stop the villian in the end. Don't ask why, it's just the way it works in movies. And of course, the real world always behaves exactly like movies -- just ask any twoofer.
 
Remember what started Dylan on this entire track...desire for fame and fortune...

He wanted to be a hollywood filmmaker. He is realizing this, to a degree, at least the fame part, and like most, it is going to his head.

The "fans" is just one more bit of evidence confirming this.

TAM:)
 
Pardalis said:
Exactly. About that WTC7 footage we saw in the teaser, how on earth are they going to spin this one around?

It's pretty damning evidence to me that the building was indeed heavily damaged and couldn't possibly be rigged with explosives.

:confused:
Click to expand...

If the building was rigged with explosives, the bombs would have gone off. Period!

Yet, I bet they'll make the ignorant, gullible viewer believe their incontrovertibly faulty, ill-founded, illogical, banausic, specious, monotoned (sometimes grandiloquent and megaphonic in the case of Alex Jones) discourse repetitiously filled with sophistic refutations.

Translation: "Yet, they'll convince a lot of people with their already debunked evidence."

I bet they've turn it and twisted so much that they have probably come up with some new 'arguments' which they are very proud of and can't wait to show us.

PS: Yes, I do want you to use the dictionary.
 
Wow. I'm impressed.

From the trailer, it appears that LC3 must have some real money and production quality behind it, it actually looks like a documentary, not some kid making a movie on his iMac.

Guess Sheen and Virgin kicked it up a notch!

But, you can't polish a turd, Dylie my boy. Needless to say, I can't wait. Gotta get my popcorn and soda ready.
 
If you want my opinion he only made it so in the teaser.
Even if it looks like a real documentary, as you said, you can't polish a turd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom