Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alan Lowey said:
You've no evidence of that what-so-ever. At least Mr Stoneman has located the exact spot for others to see that there is no root-ball there.

It wouldn't be a particularly clever prank as well as out right lying to newspaper reporters because root-ball similarities are well known about. He said the entities were moving through the forest.

P.S. They do look just like root-balls in the photo, agreed, but the man's testimony has to be given some credibility unless he's a well known hoaxer.

ETA: Take a look at the two photos. You can see the tree with the bend in it so it's the same spot.

The article adds:




................
Click to expand...

That looks a lot like Creekfreak's bigfoot - see Parcher's avatar.
 
He was CLEARLY enjoying his moment in the limelight bragging that his pictures were being shown INTERNATIONALLY. I found the picture of the tree root ball compelling since it matched exactly. How hard would it be to take a saw and let the root ball drop, then take a picture showing NOTHING was now there.

Also, he rode the wave of the Ketchum/Erickson announcement that week. I feel confident calling him Hoaxy Hoaxerson.

http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/10/bradford-pa-blobsquatch-story-propelled-by-the-bigfoot-wave/
 
Alan Lowey said:
........At least Mr Stoneman has located the exact spot for others to see that there is no root-ball there...........

ETA: Take a look at the two photos. You can see the tree with the bend in it so it's the same spot......
Click to expand...

Could you find larger sized version of those photos, please, so that I can take them into Photoshop and enlarge the area in the photo on the right that has been enlarged in the photo on the left? If you can't do that, could you perhaps link me to wherever you got the photos.

Thanks

Mike
 
Alan Lowey said:
At least he's showing his face and real name in a UK national newspaper. That's a lot more than you've ever done.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't you investigate the bigfoot as soon as you saw it?

Here we have another claim where bigfoot is supposedly right there, and all we get are some pics that look like a root ball. We still have nothing to say for sure that this was a bigfoot.

Bigfoot was supposedly right there in front of the guy...

Bigfoot doesn't even need to hide. He can stand right in the same spot for hours, right in front of people with cameras and guns, and they still can't prove he was there...
 
Alan Lowey said:
At least he's showing his face and real name in a UK national newspaper. That's a lot more than you've ever done.
Click to expand...

Some people will do anything for publicity. I wonder how much he was paid? If he wants to make a twonk out of himself then that is his affair.
 
HarryHenderson said:
In another, less attention deficit disordered universe, that subject would at least have it's own thread. ;)
Click to expand...
Who cares about a georgian with a "brain case less than half of the size of a typical human today and not much bigger than a gorilla's brain."? :boxedin: :D
 
Last edited:
idoubtit said:
He was CLEARLY enjoying his moment in the limelight bragging that his pictures were being shown INTERNATIONALLY. I found the picture of the tree root ball compelling since it matched exactly. How hard would it be to take a saw and let the root ball drop, then take a picture showing NOTHING was now there.

Also, he rode the wave of the Ketchum/Erickson announcement that week. I feel confident calling him Hoaxy Hoaxerson.

http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/10/bradford-pa-blobsquatch-story-propelled-by-the-bigfoot-wave/
Click to expand...


Okay, I'm happy to take your opinion on this one. Root-ball fake is the most likely explanation by far.
 
FWIW, I doubt anyone moved or tampered with the root ball. Looks to me like a slight deviation if the camera angle in the 2nd photo just obscured the object behind the young black cherry tree.
 
Alan Lowey said:
You've no evidence of that what-so-ever. At least Mr Stoneman has located the exact spot for others to see that there is no root-ball there.

It wouldn't be a particularly clever prank as well as out right lying to newspaper reporters because root-ball similarities are well known about. He said the entities were moving through the forest.

P.S. They do look just like root-balls in the photo, agreed, but the man's testimony has to be given some credibility unless he's a well known hoaxer.

ETA: Take a look at the two photos. You can see the tree with the bend in it so it's the same spot.

The article adds:




................
Click to expand...

Out of everyone's commentary on here you picked my statement based on follow up done at the site. Why?
 
What a croc. A bigfoot here, a bigfoot there, sightings for years of some lone bigfoot. Where`s the colonies of these, for reproducing, socializing, etc.?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom