Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...


I see some of the posters here may have clarified things for you. Here is what I do know about bigfoot claims. Since say, the beginning of time there has been no irrefutable evidence of bigfoot presented by anyone. (much like faeries, or unicorns) There have been a lot of proven sources for bigfoot evidence. The bigfooters just seem to ignore what has been proven as the source.

In fact the only proven sources for bigfoot evidence have been humans fabricating/hoaxing/lying/delusional/mistaken identity. Feel free to prove otherwise at anytime! (In fact I challenge you to! lol) There are many examples of proven sources for each type of claimed evidence.

Lets review a few things about bigfoot and what the proven sources are. (verified sources)


Actual bigfoots collected = 0
Bigfoot DNA collected = 0
Bigfoot hairs collected = 0
Bigfoot bones or fossils collected = 0


If you want to talk about dents in the ground, or casts of them cool. A lot of footers love to say "what about the footprints?! Something is leaving the footprints!" Yep. We have a proven source of those too, multiple times. 100% of proven sources have been one of the things I listed above. (fabricating/hoaxing/lying/delusionsal/mistaken identity) Again, feel free to prove otherwise at anytime!

The sightings man! What about the sightings!?!! People are seeing something!

Yeah, about those. People claim to see a lot of things. (ghosts, aliens, leprechauns in alabama, fire breathing dragons, mermaids) Does it make any of them any more real because people claim to see it? As someone else suggested up thread, replace the word bigfoot in any of those sentences or claims with leprechaun, or reptilian alien (insert your social construct of choice here!) and see if it sounds any more credible. Does it make that subject have more merit the more people claim to see it, yet no evidence at all turns up for its existence? How long and how many sightings can be claimed with zero evidence turning up before something sounds afoul to you?

For you personally ScannerHead, at what point do you declare tyrannosaurus rex extinct? For what reasons?

When does bigfoot become extinct or non existent in your mind? For what reasons? Uhm, yeah. I may not be the most politically correct poster here. But I think the message is pretty clear, and direct.

Bigfoot = proven source.
 
Last edited:
ScannerHead said:
wow. for a place that has a 'put up or shutup' attitude, you must know EVERY ONE out there in bigfooting and what they have or dont have to be able to say that.

wheres your evidence of what people do or dont know? your just as big a braggart as all the people in bf'ing that you claim to dispise.
Click to expand...

Please learn about proper apostrophe placement.

Sorry, Desertgal beat me to it.
 
River said:
If you want to talk about dents in the ground, or casts of them cool. A lot of footers love to say "what about the footprints?! Something is leaving the footprints!" Yep. We have a proven source of those too, multiple times. 100% of proven sources have been one of the things I listed above. (fabricating/hoaxing/lying/delusionsal/mistaken identity) Again, feel free to prove otherwise at anytime!
Click to expand...
They don't get those right, even. Their footprints don't show the pressure or motion of the foot properly. They look like feet, which seems intuitively to be what they look like--but if you go out to a beach sometime and walk down it barefoot you'll see that the footprints look completely different. The heel is deeper, toes distorted from the motion. There's often a roll to the foot that bigfoot footprints lack. There's actually a lot you can learn from footprints--but most of it is from aspects not included in the footprint casts.
 
ScannerHead said:
i never said i did. I was pointing out that HE is saying he KNOWS something he cant possibly know. he can assume or think or believe that theres nobody out there in the entire world that doesnt have any proof, but he cant know it in any absolute way.it really is that simple to understand.
Click to expand...

Where would the proof be? With whom? Why is it being withheld?

There is no practical proof of the North American cryptid known as bigfoot.
 
In which thread were we supposed to get the update from the SBCM regarding the number of hominid fossils they have? I can't remember if it's this one, or the other one...Either way, a phone call should have been done yesterday, and I think it's reasonable to expect the results today. Personally, I think they should have been able to figure out how to get the results in ten minutes without bothering anyone, but I'm holding off until I hear how the phone call went before I demonstrate that.
 
Dinwar said:
I have. Remember those pages of references? That's EXACTLY what you'd get if you'd ask a scientist for proof. If another researcher asked "Where would I find a good selection of horse fossils?" I'd hand them one of Eric Scott's papers. Most include the names, addresses, and contact information of the researchers in question, and if not it's certainly no trick, in the digital age, to track that information down (they ALWAYS include affiliation).

The fact that you're unwilling to put forth even that minimal effort tells me you're not actually honest in this discussion. I'm treating you in precisely the same way I'd treat a particularly obnoxious colleague, a rank you've yet to actually earn. That means you don't get to object that I haven't done as you request; all that proves is that you don't actually know what you're requesting.

Okay. Contact the San Bernardino County Museum of Natural History and request a review of all hominid fossils they have. Let me know what they say. Oh, as an aside: that's one of the things I frequently do for my job, so I'll know if you actually do it or not. I know they've got 'em, so it's not like I'm merely testing you. But I know what their policy is, so if you try to fake it it will be easy to detect.
Click to expand...

ChrisBFRPKY said:
Thank you , I'll call Monday. Wasn't that easy? No addition of extra drama required though.
Click to expand...

How'd that call work out for you, Chris?
 
Slowvehicle said:
1. You are on record lying about what I said. (It is telling that you continue to avoid this).

2. I did not address my question about a "higher power" to Dinwar, but to you. I am not the least bit confused by what I would mean by a "higher power", were I ever to stoop to the term. I am mildly interested in what you mean by the term; I am a bit more interested in your continued avoidance of answering the question. (It is telling that you pretend not to understand this).

3. The truth is only "unnerving" when you are trying to hide from its implications.

4. Your pretended lack of understanding, your avoidance, your obfuscation, your clear errors about the human/hominid fossils, and your general calumny do not turn my post into "nonsense" (especially since you continue to avoid arguing the issue, instead preferring to pretend to address the issuer).

BTW, you are incorrect about my intent.
Click to expand...



All this sounds enough for a Wilbur the Weasel Award



ChrisBFRPKY, you are hereby awarded the Order of Wilbur

OrderOfWilbur.png


For weaslry above and beyond the call of duty​
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
All this sounds enough for a Wilbur the Weasel Award



ChrisBFRPKY, you are hereby awarded the Order of Wilbur

[qimg]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/98915197/JREF/OrderOfWilbur.png[/qimg]

For weaslry above and beyond the call of duty​
Click to expand...


Pretty freakin awesome ^^^ lol

Bigfoot is definitely part of our culture, just like the UFO, ghost and other paranormal elements. (vampires, werewolves, unicorns, leprechauns etc) The whole point is; I could claim to see a couple of stormtroopers cruising through my backyard on flying cats and no one would believe me despite having clear images of it. Why do you think that is? Why is bigfoots lack of discovery more plausible in todays world? The image of the stormtroopers is ostensibly clear. It's not like bigfoot was ever discussed in scientific circles as putatively authentic. Bigfooters expressing egalitarianism among skeptics with no supporting evidence for their claims should be handled in the same way others making baseless claims are. There are no special rules that only apply for cataloging bigfoot. It must follow the same protocols as every other animal has. So it has not been cataloged, and to date "does not exist" as a real animal. It does however exist as folk lore, and the source of the phenomenon has been proven many times over. (which the bigfooters love to ignore time and again!)

No matter who the plenipotentiary, it's still garbage and baseless.
 
Last edited:
The Pit of 6000 Neanderthal Bones presented our latest bleever visitor with irrefutable proof that no, all human ancestral fossils will not fit on a table of any size in which the word "table" retains meaning. Is anyone genuinely surprised he hasn't returned to face the proverbial music?
 
Chris demonstrated an anti-science agenda, he was caught in more than one deceitful statement, and he spewed as much Bigfoot fairy tale nonsense as some of the most starry-eyed "knowers" on the BFF. He is either playing people with stories he knows darn well to be false or he has deluded himself terribly into truly believing some shadows he's seen in the woods are real bigfoots. Either way, a bit of snark might be necessary to shake the cobwebs from his head or let him know that there are people in this world who can see his ruse and will call him on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom