Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
It sounds like some canid and some human. I think there are some fox/coyote/dog vocalizations in there. But I also think there is some human-trying-to-sound-scary in there too.

In my opinion this is an intentional Bigfoot hoax audio. Some guy wants other guys to think he recorded Bigfoot.
 
This thread has been taken off moderated status. Please stay on topic and be mindful of Rules 0 and 12. Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Loss Leader
 
Why does the title still show Moderated?

Someone forgot to change it and it wasn't me.
Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have talked to him.
He has not been captured by Bigfoot or Bigfooters.
 
I used to get a random email once in awhile from him as well and haven't heard from him in quite a while.
I smell a consipracy.
 
I don't have to listen to know that whatever it is, I can duplicate it. Anyone with a halfway decent singing voice could produce any of the sounds attributed to Bigfoot. And anyone with a couple beers in them on karaoke night at your local could produce most of them.

Sound evidence is, frankly, not very persuasive to me.
 
I don't have to listen to know that whatever it is, I can duplicate it. Anyone with a halfway decent singing voice could produce any of the sounds attributed to Bigfoot. And anyone with a couple beers in them on karaoke night at your local could produce most of them.

Sound evidence is, frankly, not very persuasive to me.

Well, you are correct. I won't be able to persuade you if I can't get you to listen. Thanks anyways.
 
Let me know your thoughts.

Again it sounds like a person making spooky sounds in hopes that people will think it's Bigfoot.

In March of 2012, a Minnesota sasquatch researcher, Mike, captured a series of howls and other vocalizations on his audio recorder that we have named the 2012 Minnesota Howls.

See, one big problem is that this was provided by a Bigfoot believer. Bigfooters seem to be the ones presenting Bigfoot hoaxes as opposed to normal everyday people. Basically what happens is that the believers are the hoaxers - not normal everyday people. Sometimes the believers are the target of a hoax - but the actual hoaxer is probably a believer too.

The safest bet is that the person who presents the evidence is the hoaxer or is an ally/enabler of the hoaxer.

But really the creature making these sounds could be a living dinosaur, or Dire wolf or a huge flightless bird which has never been confirmed by science.
 
So, people can see bigfoot in the woods, people can find bigfoot tracks in the woods, and people can hear bigfoot in the woods?

But no one can actually prove that bigfoot is in the woods?

Or even get decent picture of bigfoot in the woods?
 
So, people can see bigfoot in the woods, people can find bigfoot tracks in the woods, and people can hear bigfoot in the woods?

But no one can actually prove that bigfoot is in the woods?

Or even get decent picture of bigfoot in the woods?

Correct.
 
I am not sure I have this right, but I think there is another recording submitted by this same person in which the "bigfoot(s)" actually use the name Mike in their calls. Not sure where I remember it from or even if I am correct, but the submitter "mike" was allegedly let go by another crazy bigfooter Mathew Johnson and his team in Oregon. Johnson is the medical doctor who now leaves gifts for bigfoot in an habituation area somewhere in Oregon or Washington. The silly idea that there is a phonetic language for bigfoot is my personal favorite bigfoot nonsense of all time. Northern Lights and OntarioSquatch, please think this through and realize that you are being taken for a ride by people who make money from this bigfoot pursuit. no such critter exists.
 
Audio aside, it all still seems very hoaxy. Sasquatch Ontario (Mike P) has come up with a load of evidence that looks like it's been fabricated. Checkout this Sasquatch handprint that he documented

33466gi.jpg


Why is that?

I don't know.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom