Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
mustbeso said:
Sorry for the out of place post. I was simply wondering if Thinker Thunker is using the fact that the deer carrying bigfoot video is shot on cellphone as reason for it being real. It seems most hoaxes are presented in as little detail as possible and a cellphone offers (usually) very little detail. Think Rick Dyer and the tent video. As technology improves the film/video becomes the enemy of the hoaxer. You can blow up the PGF until hell freezes over with the same relative result but HD video is something else. How many of these nimrods go out bigfoot researching and then tell you they only had a cell phone? The art of the hoax seems to no longer require video but instead, be structured like the woodape group who have in their monograph stated they are not even interested in photp evidence.
Click to expand...



Got it. Seems silly though. My cellphone takes HD video and my 2 phones before that took pretty good quality video. That around 8 years of having a good video camera on my person 100% of the time. There is a half life on these silly excuses for unclear video. Not that they were ever credible, but just about everyone who has a kid with a tablet or phone at this point can see how ridiculous claims of blurry video are.
 
Alaska prepares for wood bison return after a century
Click to expand...

http://news.yahoo.com/alaska-officials-prepare-wood-bison-reintroduction-162252280.html
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Alaska wildlife officials are preparing to release North America's largest land mammal into its native U.S. habitat for the first time in more than a century.

The Alaska Department of Fish and Game on Sunday plans to begin moving wood bison from a conservation center south of Anchorage to the village of Shageluk, the staging area for the animals' release into the Innoko Flats about 350 miles southwest of Fairbanks.

A hundred wood bison will be released after they're acclimated in a few weeks.

"This has been an incredibly long project — 23 years in the making," biologist Cathie Harms said. "To say we're excited is an understatement."

Wood bison are the larger of two subspecies of American bison but did not roam in Lower 48 states. The smaller subspecies are plains bison, which were not native to Alaska but were introduced to the state in 1928, where they have thrived.

Bull wood bison weigh 2,000 pounds and stand 6-feet-tall at the shoulder. They feed on grasses, sedges and forbs and wider variety of other plants, including Alaska's abundant willow.

...
Click to expand...

I wonder how bigfoot will react?
 
Rincewind said:
Aren't they supposed to be experts in camouflage?

:)
Click to expand...

They are camouflaged as if they were people in plaid and a Stetson. They are amazing! Sometimes they will camouflage themselves to look just like rocks for years at a time.
 
Nakani said:
Chris,

I understand your reluctance to post your 15' video on the internet. I for one, can't wait until you release it to the public. I was thinking proof of this video would go a long way to boost your credibility. It seems that its come to a point where what ever you say is treated like a joke and is just fodder for insults. I don't know why you even bother to post any more.

I noticed that one of the members here lives in the Kentucky area(Garette). If he were to sign the necessary paperwork and view the video on your computer, he could verify that you do indeed have this video, he has become a "knower" and that everyone should have some respect.

What do you say?
Click to expand...

Chris, I'm bumping this post it seems you missed it.
 
Nakani said:
Chris, I'm bumping this post it seems you missed it.
Click to expand...

Nakami, thanks but I'm not interested in a Devil's advocate for this forum. I've previously invited cervelo from the forum. From what I understand from his time camping here and our one day short trek, he has reached the conclusion there are no Bigfoot creatures in KY and the area shown to him was impossible for Bigfoot to be in. I'm perfectly fine with his assessment as it is based on his limited time spent here. I'm not aware if he was able to investigate the then recent local Bigfoot sighting in Brownsville while he was here or not. I suspect he did not. However, I would not reasonably expect anyone to have a sighting the first time out. I haven't had a good sighting since 2010 and I'm out 3 times a week during peak season.
Chris B.
 
ComfySlippers said:
I'm adding to this thread for my own selfish goals. I apologise but didn't know where to thread this.
Mods, feel free to delete or send me to the bad place.

This figbootery nonsense is making my Spidey senses tingle.
It's car crash TV.
Hilarious.

So now I do the infomercial:
I need 4 people who are prepared to rant and who can say "nonchalantly"
Click to expand...

Heck. Sign me up. I have a beard. I can even sing "Lush Life".
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Nakami, thanks but I'm not interested in a Devil's advocate for this forum. I've previously invited cervelo from the forum. From what I understand from his time camping here and our one day short trek, he has reached the conclusion there are no Bigfoot creatures in KY and the area shown to him was impossible for Bigfoot to be in. I'm perfectly fine with his assessment as it is based on his limited time spent here. I'm not aware if he was able to investigate the then recent local Bigfoot sighting in Brownsville while he was here or not. I suspect he did not. However, I would not reasonably expect anyone to have a sighting the first time out. I haven't had a good sighting since 2010 and I'm out 3 times a week during peak season.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

Have you had a poor sighting? If so what happened?
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Nakami, thanks but I'm not interested in a Devil's advocate for this forum. I've previously invited cervelo from the forum. From what I understand from his time camping here and our one day short trek, he has reached the conclusion there are no Bigfoot creatures in KY and the area shown to him was impossible for Bigfoot to be in. I'm perfectly fine with his assessment as it is based on his limited time spent here. I'm not aware if he was able to investigate the then recent local Bigfoot sighting in Brownsville while he was here or not. I suspect he did not. However, I would not reasonably expect anyone to have a sighting the first time out. I haven't had a good sighting since 2010 and I'm out 3 times a week during peak season.
Chris B.
Click to expand...
That would be correct on my assessment of this site which has appox. 5 million visitors yearly and a very active local population.

Of all locations similar to it that I have visited it is uniquely unremote. It has a tremendous amount of local traffic through it on a daily basis and its local population is very active hunting the edges and fishing in the interior. It's geography divides it in half as well which concentrates even more scrutiny in a smaller area.

During the season this location has numerous guided tours, by foot and boat traversing all areas of this location. Also worth mentioning.. some of its fauna is so unique to this location that its scrutiny keeps many trained professionals in the field on a regular basis.
I did spend sometime in the Brownsvilles area and found nothing complelling other than some beautiful countryside and friendly people.

I spent almost a week in this area two nights on an island and one night in the "backcountry" which may as well have been camping in your backyard.

As an example of how utilized this area is in our rush to get out before dark (yes Chris is afraid to stay out in the woods after dark) we encountered a complete family unit......of people hiking in to have a cookout. IMO this area has zero possibility of having any undiscovered anything over 1lbs.

Some of Chris's behavior during our time together would indicate to me his confirmation bias is off the scale and he could mistake virtually anything in the woods for Bigfoot.
 
Last edited:
Cervelo said:
That would be correct on my assessment of this site which has appox. 5 million visitors yearly and a very active local population...

As an example of how utilized this area is in our rush to get out before dark (yes Chris is afraid to stay out in the woods after dark)
Click to expand...

Five million. Five million.

Thanks for going. This is why the rule of keeping habitat secret evolved, as with Area X. They claim it is to prevent people away from bigfoot but the absurdity is immediately apparent.

I wonder if the "afraid of the dark" is just another part of the act. You can test for that by sending a stripper in a bikini out ahead in the dark, and see if he tracks her.
 
That's according to the website....the place is beat and most definitely not off the beaten path.
 
Let's not forget that ThinkerThunker thunks there be footies in Yellowstone, with 3 million visitors per year and FSM knows how many field biologists studying wolf, elk, griz populations. Plus siesmologists, geologists,and gists I can't think of right now.

None of them run into ole foo, but some nitwit youtube analyst thinks they be holed up by Ole Faithful, stalking them bison.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom