Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
As has been previously suggested by you and others here:
1.It's a "tree welder"
2.It's "shadows" (that seem to exist in direct sunlight)
3.It's "leaves" (that seem to be on the trees in early March at about the 37th parallel)

Based on the ambiguous nature of this particular pic and without further release, I'm inclined to agree it's not evidence for Bigfoot although I do find some of the counter explanations entertaining.

Since we've already had this discussion here on this particular pic, I can't help but wonder about your intentions of revamping it? Without further release, it certainly is the worst evidence I've collected. I freely admit that, you win.
Chris B.

I'd like to learn more about the circumstances of this pic that you've submitted as evidence....balls in your court ;)
For instance when you zoom in on the day after photo (on the left) it appears you may have captured another bigfoot in the exact same place!

LOL boy you got some brass to question someone's intent!
 
Last edited:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...rthal-genome-incest-archaic-ancestor-science/

"Data obtained from a Neanderthal woman's toe bone points to incest and inbreeding among early humans, an international genetics team reported on Wednesday.

The fossil's genetic map, or genome, reported from Denisova cave in Siberia's Altai Mountains dates to more than 50,000 years ago. The cave was home at separate times to both Neanderthals and the so-called Denisovans, two sister families of now-extinct early humans. (See also "New Type of Ancient Human Found.")

Adding to increasing evidence of a tangled human family tree, the new Neanderthal genome study released by the journal Nature also suggests that another previously unknown archaic human species shared its genes with some of our ancestors. The study authors suggest that it was Homo erectus, one of the earliest human species, which first arose around 1.8 million years ago. (See also "Why Am I a Neanderthal?")"

At this point I feel you don't even realize what you're arguing. It is frustrating to see such zeal demonstrated of simply refusing to acknowledge scientific facts of a known find that are published and on record.

I don't hold it against you in any way of course as it seems common to dispute most anything I post, but let's take a closer look at what you are arguing against.

The Neanderthal toe bone I've referenced is a very significant find. It has nothing to do with the Denisovan type specimen finger bone. That is a separate issue. The Neanderthal DNA mapping of the toe bone is what led to the earliest discovery of the unknown archaic DNA in discussion. That same archaic DNA was also found in the Denisovan type specimens but that again is a separate issue.

If this is still confusing, I would suggest you ask The Shrike to better explain it to you as this is the last time I will attempt to do so. Chris B.
You DO NOT HAVE ANY IDEA what you're talking about. Contrary to Popular Bigfooting belief, making **** up as you go along isn't actually honest. Seriously, I suggest you get back to what you do best, taking pictures of suspicious sticks.

Don't be dragging me into this now. I'm still pouting that my invalid joke went unnoticed.
Hey now, stand in line buddy! I've only had a few dozen of those fly right by everyone. :xtongue

The joke again, for apparently everyone since "everyone" missed it.
If you got saliva from a bigfoot that was an invalid, why didn't you just track it down as he hobbled, drooling through the marginally wooded parts of Kentucky?
nyuk nyuk nyuk
 
This is all working out the way Chris wants. He is in full control. Skeptics ask, beg and demand and Chris can deny them anything he wants and in any way that he wants. They can even make new threads for him to use and he can completely avoid it.

Watch the skeptics run around and bang their heads. The joy of causing and controlling that spectacle. It's nothing but WIN for the Bigfooter - while the Skeptic sees it as nothing but LOSE.

Yes, that's why I stopped playing his games.

He's stuck in believerville and determined not to even try to get out, in either direction. He's afraid to find out the truth. He doesn't take even the simplest steps to move in any direction.

Not even towards bigfoot being real.

He's nice and safe, believing in Bigfoot without any evidence, and comfortably "important" in the believer ranks.

Rocking the boat is not on the agenda.
 
I just watched 5 minutes of "finding Bigfoot." They didn't find Bigfoot, and I feel about 10 IQ points dumber for having seen it. People like this make me think that idiocracy was a documentary.
 
Well since Chris feels he's said all he's going to about his picture of Bigfoot....here we go!
I'm assuming he thinks this is the Bigfoot?
[qimg]http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/yy242/RCM944/F5471454-C0E7-4DCC-AE6F-F53417CE9157.jpg[/qimg]
That's one deformed bigfoot and tiny as well...ummmm how do they suspended in mid-air?
Could this bigfoot be in mid-morph to another dimension or shape shifting?
These are the questions that science must answer, since Chris won't.

To show my ignorance about this kind of thing, I thought the bigfoot was the one peeking around the tree at left and waving. Seriously. Thanks for clarifying.
 
I just watched 5 minutes of "finding Bigfoot." They didn't find Bigfoot, and I feel about 10 IQ points dumber for having seen it. People like this make me think that idiocracy was a documentary.


This will help. :D The true origin of bigfoot. A giant unicorn llammacabra had some bad acid, and puked up a rainbow with fully grown bigfoot. And then there was bigfoot. The end.

sgzBlIn.png
 
To show my ignorance about this kind of thing, I thought the bigfoot was the one peeking around the tree at left and waving. Seriously. Thanks for clarifying.

Oh I'm guessing if you stare long enough you'll see whatever you'd like.
Since Chris won't discuss the circumstances surrounding his pic, it's assumed that this was done with the latest rage in Bigfoot research.
Go to your research area, which by the way Bigfoot is always right there waiting for you to show up. Then assume a 8-10' tall 500-800lb monkey man wood ninja has snuck up on you and start taking pictures.
Another great one is video behind yourself while walking trails, of course your bigfoot buddy is always just one step behind, and all this action is totally unseen in real time.....post expedition review of the footage is when the Bigfoots really start to show up!
Also lets not leave out the Bigfoot buddy in your backyard habitators, there are a whole group of these delusional researchers over at BFF. Their leader is a nuthag that goes by Sassyfoot, who is one of the "chosen" ones a very special knower with a Bigfoot connection. Their primary research technique appears to be and is really astounding, just walk out onto your deck and start taking pictures and of course go back in the house and let the discovery begin. This group just as Chris also claims to have the good stuff but won't release it...they also tend to believe in Bigfoot mind meld, bigfoot has pets, Bigfoot will follow you home all sorts of wacky poop!
Finally there's a group of people that appear to actually have some outdoor experience and encounter something the can't explain either in person or maybe a game cam pic. Their experience takes them down a rabbit hole of "I can't explain it....therefore it must be Bigfoot!!!
I myself have had this experince many times and the experiences range from unknowns in the woods, to ghosts and even an NDE, but my mind works with "most likleys" and it's most likley I'm mistaken, misinterpreting what I'm experiencing.
But this group of people tend to jump the shark on eveything they find in the woods, broken branches, stumps, any depression in the ground is a track, any noise is Bigfoot....always when one is Bigfoot hunting guess what they find ;)
Here are some great examples of this mentality....these are all most likley
Top left
Thermal image of a cow
Top right
Trail cam of back of an owl
Lower left
Trail cam of moose knee
Lower right
Raccoon or opossum climbing tree

If you went over to BFF (Bigfoot Fantasy w/Friends) and made these suggestions whew the fun would begin....the one of the cow is a locked thread, no more cow discussion it must be Bigfoot!
I'd love for Bigfoot to be real it's a very romantic notion....the wildman living in the woods by his own choice, at one with nature.
But there's nothing I've ever seen or heard that can't be explained with a much more reasonable "most likley" as opposed to an imaginary monkey man.
Except of course River's theory now that requires further research!!!
 
Last edited:
I just watched 5 minutes of "finding Bigfoot." They didn't find Bigfoot, and I feel about 10 IQ points dumber for having seen it. People like this make me think that idiocracy was a documentary.

Title should be, "Looking for Bigfoot," or more accurately, "Looking for Ratings."
 
A formal Rorschach test on a Bigfoot believer would be fascinating! Of course, we already have lots of those informally from their interpretations of photos and videos.
 
I'm assuming that ChrisBFRPKY either; 1. Realized how wrong he was about the Neandertal Toe Bone, found at Denisova, which he thought contained Archaic human DNA, which was actually found in the finger bone and tooth of the Denisovan population... OR 2. He was in Kentucky, and an Ol' Footie decided to chuck a Peppermint Patty at his party, incapacitating one or two Footers with his INFRASOUND Delight emission, which he discharged when the Peppermint Patty struck one of the party squarely in the Scrotal region.
 
I'm assuming that ChrisBFRPKY either; 1. Realized how wrong he was about the Neandertal Toe Bone, found at Denisova, which he thought contained Archaic human DNA, which was actually found in the finger bone and tooth of the Denisovan population... OR 2. He was in Kentucky, and an Ol' Footie decided to chuck a Peppermint Patty at his party, incapacitating one or two Footers with his INFRASOUND Delight emission, which he discharged when the Peppermint Patty struck one of the party squarely in the Scrotal region.

I'd have to go with the second option since admitting errors and accepting reality are not traits that Chris has displayed to date.
 
I'm figuring he's just trying to guess at the minimum amount of time he can stay away before he can pull the "Argument Reset" Switch and come back and start the argument all over again from square one, having learned nothing.
 
I'm figuring he's just trying to guess at the minimum amount of time he can stay away before he can pull the "Argument Reset" Switch and come back and start the argument all over again from square one, having learned nothing.

I've always wondered if the original poster was simply waiting for the other foum members to forget the previous cycle (?), or if the poster was actually waiting to themselves forget the previous cycle and therefore plunge once again into a fresh cycle on the forum with honestly no memory of the previous criticisms. The longest period of which I am aware was close to one year, with the original poster then making a surprise re-appearance to rehash the entire argument again.

In this case I have urged Chris to go out and get the definitive evidence for Bigfoot that he has claimed to seek. Maybe he is, and that would be great! Can you imagine if he returns with very clear video, pictures, and/or trustworthy DNA sequence results! I would be both excited and humbled. It would be huge news almost everywhere! Whereas posting the same old rehashed Bigfoot stories/blurry images here would only be a waste of his time.
 
Latests video "evidence" on my bigfoot news alert.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnhzxrpIMU

I saw this a few days ago and chuckled...I had heard about new and "exciting" video footage before I had the opportunity to find it. Once again, the footers see exactly what they want to see. I see either a hoaxer or a fat dude in a black hoodie trying to get away from the nutcase that's chasing him around in the woods taking pictures.
 
I saw this a few days ago and chuckled...I had heard about new and "exciting" video footage before I had the opportunity to find it. Once again, the footers see exactly what they want to see. I see either a hoaxer or a fat dude in a black hoodie trying to get away from the nutcase that's chasing him around in the woods taking pictures.

Personally, I am withholding judgement until ThinkerThunker proclaims it to be a bigfoot based on grainy, indeterminable arm length ratios. Then and only then will we know for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom