Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Personally, I'm kind of sick of all the Bigfoot believers who slam Chris' evidence and stories as being nothing but worthless hillbilly attention-seeking crap. Those jerks need to understand the respect that is due from work. Respect from real work.
 
Keep in mind the number of claims by Chris for these pics and vids in May of 2010:


There are apparently lots of creatures in the 8.1mp picture.
One was in plain sight. That is, easily visible to anyone. Not hidden at all. Nothing blocking the view of it, etc.

The 8.1mp picture is now available at his web site.

The cropped pic shows the creature that was in plain sight. Again, this means out in the open and plainly visible.
This is that crop:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_P2YYB9zzGb0/S-fA4SJJHdI/AAAAAAAAAHk/_vFGXCVfiyE/s1600/PIC42CR.jpg

Chris is able to get very close to the creatures sometimes.
The male and female creatures show high sexual dimorphism.

There are 3 videos that have been reviewed by scientists.
Those 3 videos show a lot of creatures with various characteristics.

Steve Kulls is investigating Chris's claims and evidence. ***** Chris has made some incredible claims in early 2010, which would prove that bigfoot exists if they were true, but he has yet to back up any of them. We have yet to hear from any scientists that reviewed any BFRPKY videos, as far as I can tell. I don't know what Kulls came up with in his investigation. I was not able to find a report.

Where in the world did you get the idea that I was quoting Steve Kulls?

This section certainly looks like you were quoting Kulls. If I am mistaken and it was not intended to do so then I'm taking it the wrong way, I certainly apologize. Appearances can be deceiving. Chris B.
 
Your use of the term work, I'm curious about that. I've seen that term used for many years on the BFF and in the same way that the fundamental religious use the same term and in the same way. Doing God's work. God's work shall be done.

It's as if both the religious and Bigfoot believer already know that the object of their belief will never ever be proven to exist. But they talk to each other in a common language based on a quest that they have voluntarily chosen and they call the stereotyped actions work.

Looking for Bigfoot is work. Looking for Bigfoot is God's work and it shall be done by Christians. Bless every one of you. Bless the Bigfoot Faithful in the Name of Christ.

That's always been one of my favorites "The Woodsmen Resume" challenge.
I had no idea about the religious fanatic aspect until getting a behind the scene look at opnions in the Tar Pit/BFF....pretty disturbing!
 
This section certainly looks like you were quoting Kulls. If I am mistaken and it was not intended to do so then I'm taking it the wrong way, I certainly apologize. Appearances can be deceiving. Chris B.

There is no quote from Kulls in my post.

A quote appears a certain way on this, and most other boards.

BTW, what did Kulls say about your bigfoot claims and evidence?

He's a believer, so I'm curious about his opinions.
 
Personally, I'm kind of sick of all the Bigfoot believers who slam Chris' evidence and stories as being nothing but worthless hillbilly attention-seeking crap. Those jerks need to understand the respect that is due from work. Respect from real work.

LOL, I like the new profile pic.

Does it really matter who (you say) slams my pics when I already agree they're not conclusive evidence of Bigfoot? I don't think so. :) Chris B.
 
Lowland or mountain?
Kentucky would possibly have both based on Darwin's evolutionary theory. But that is only a theory. God may have created Kentucky gorillas for down low and up high. Or, they could just move around after God created them. God may have also created a midland gorilla which we have not discovered yet within his kingdom. Blessed be the Lord.
 
It's funny though, many do nothing other than ridicule other's findings without ever having presented any findings or research of their own. Free ride I suppose.

To ridicule other's work without ever having done any similar work or investigation of your own? You're opinion is not qualified. That's a fact.
:) Chris B.


And after repeatedly saying you know who has the burden of proof, you quickly demonstrate you actually don't know.
 
Your use of the term work, I'm curious about that. I've seen that term used for many years on the BFF and in the same way that the fundamental religious use the same term and in the same way. Doing God's work. God's work shall be done.

It's as if both the religious and Bigfoot believer already know that the object of their belief will never ever be proven to exist. But they talk to each other in a common language based on a quest that they have voluntarily chosen and they call the stereotyped actions work.

Looking for Bigfoot is work. Looking for Bigfoot is God's work and it shall be done by Christians. Bless every one of you. Bless the Bigfoot Faithful in the Name of Christ.

Work means effort spent doing something as I've used it. In my use, something to achieve a certain goal. I suppose you can go off on a tangent to describe other aspects of the word "work" if you feel the need.

It seems you'd like to tie Bigfoot and Christianity. That's not an odd pairing coming from a skeptic. Trending the two as being faith based. The obvious difference is that Bigfoot is not faith based since it can be witnessed as a biological being.

Faith has nothing to do with Bigfoot. Bigfoot sightings can occur by individuals of different religious faiths and beliefs, so it would seem Bigfoot is not related to Christianity or any other religion in particular. Maybe you're basing your supposition on the majority of the US population being Christian so by which you suppose the majority of Bigfoot sightings to be made by Christians? That's rational, but not every sighting can be attributed to a Christian witness, thereby dismissing the effort to tie Bigfoot with Christianity specifically.
Chris B.
 
Work means effort spent doing something as I've used it. In my use, something to achieve a certain goal. I suppose you can go off on a tangent to describe other aspects of the word "work" if you feel the need.

It seems you'd like to tie Bigfoot and Christianity. That's not an odd pairing coming from a skeptic. Trending the two as being faith based. The obvious difference is that Bigfoot is not faith based since it can be witnessed as a biological being.

Faith has nothing to do with Bigfoot. Bigfoot sightings can occur by individuals of different religious faiths and beliefs, so it would seem Bigfoot is not related to Christianity or any other religion in particular. Maybe you're basing your supposition on the majority of the US population being Christian so by which you suppose the majority of Bigfoot sightings to be made by Christians? That's rational, but not every sighting can be attributed to a Christian witness, thereby dismissing the effort to tie Bigfoot with Christianity specifically.
Chris B.
Forget all that non sequitur mumbo jumbo that you just wrote. I'm talking about the Fundamental Christian affinity for Bigfoot Belief. I'm not talking about every single claimed sighting there is. Pay attention! Blessed Be The Lord.
 
Forget all that non sequitur mumbo jumbo that you just wrote. I'm talking about the Fundamental Christian affinity for Bigfoot Belief. I'm not talking about every single claimed sighting there is. Pay attention! Blessed Be The Lord.
LOL Now that's funny.
Chris B.
 
Chris, why aren't there any Black or Muslim Bigfooters in America? It's because the hoaxers are too busy coming up with fake stories instead of faking the various possible cultures of eyewitnesses. Bigfootery isn't just a folk myth - it's one for a particular race, religion and culture. Bigfootery is not an equal opportunity belief because the whole thing is fabricated and predominantly perpetuated by a particular subculture of white guys.

For the most part, Bigfootery is about the beliefs of Christian whites guys and the wives/women that live in their homes. It has spread to other common folk but they need to understand the roots of where Bigfootery came from and where it's concrete foundation lies.

America.
The Holy Bible.
Bigfoot.
Tradition.
Values.
Freedom.

Blessed be the Lord. Go outside and see a Bigfoot and be a proud American.
 
I'm not playing any cards/games. You guys win. Shrike knew I've already agreed my pics and videos from my website are too ambiguous. You can safely assume it may be nothing more than pareidolia to see Bigfoot in them as they're certainly not evidence of Bigfoot. I agree.

No hard feelings on my part about it at all. I know when I'm wrong and I'll freely admit it. Don't you enjoy being right? I'm actually agreeing with you that you are. Chris B.
That's nice, "no hard feelings" for us pointing out your pics only show what your hopes and dreams would be in stick form. And it's true that we always refuse to look at any pics that have an actual Bigfoot in them. They're not near as fun as the real fake photos. Or is it the fake real photos?! I forget.

Just so it's clear, you're only "agreeing" to "admit" you're "wrong" in this one instance. Additionally, the only thing you're agreeing to is they're not good evidence of Bigfoot, not that they're not of Bigfoot. No?

And then you pretty much take back that one meager concession in a subsequent post.
I'll try, of course that's not a guarantee of success, but it's more effort than some put into solving a mystery.
It's funny though, many do nothing other than ridicule other's findings without ever having presented any findings or research of their own. Free ride I suppose.

To ridicule other's work without ever having done any similar work or investigation of your own? You're opinion is not qualified. That's a fact.
:) Chris B.
So what you're saying is for skeptics slackers somebody to be truly "qualified" to "ridicule" your pics, they have to have Bigfoot work experience? For how long? Eyesight and general knowledge of what is and what isn't a big hairy monster isn't enough? Ask an eight year old what's in your pics. I bet it's not Bigfoot. Luckily for you he's not gonna be qualified either.

Your use of the term work, I'm curious about that. I've seen that term used for many years on the BFF and in the same way that the fundamental religious use the same term and in the same way. Doing God's work. God's work shall be done.

It's as if both the religious and Bigfoot believer already know that the object of their belief will never ever be proven to exist. But they talk to each other in a common language based on a quest that they have voluntarily chosen and they call the stereotyped actions work.

Looking for Bigfoot is work. Looking for Bigfoot is God's work and it shall be done by Christians. Bless every one of you. Bless the Bigfoot Faithful in the Name of Christ.
:biggrin: So funny true!
 
Chris, why aren't there any Black or Muslim Bigfooters in America? It's because the hoaxers are too busy coming up with fake stories instead of faking the various possible cultures of eyewitnesses. Bigfootery isn't just a folk myth - it's one for a particular race, religion and culture. Bigfootery is not an equal opportunity belief because the whole thing is fabricated and predominantly perpetuated by a particular subculture of white guys.

For the most part, Bigfootery is about the beliefs of Christian white redneck guys and the wives/women that live in their mobile homes. It has spread to other common folk but they need to understand the roots of where Bigfootery came from and where it's concrete block foundation lies.

America.
The Holy Bible.
Bigfoot.
Tradition.
Values.
Freedom.

Blessed be the Lord. Go outside and see a Bigfoot and be a proud American.

Sorry, Parcher, but I just had to fix that for you.
 
"Originally Posted by The Shrike View Post
Chris, is there a living, breathing bigfoot visible in the above photograph that Harry linked from your website?"

"Yep, though barely visible. This one too:

http://www.bfrpky.com/ChrisBennetblnkanimation.gif"


You can safely assume it may be nothing more than pareidolia to see Bigfoot in them as they're certainly not evidence of Bigfoot. I agree.

Wait, so now you think your photos don't show bigfoots?
 
And after repeatedly saying you know who has the burden of proof, you quickly demonstrate you actually don't know.
I quickly demonstrate I don't know what?
Chris B.

You really didn't understand that sentence? I'll try to be clearer:

You're demonstrating you don't understand who has the burden of proof when you take other people to task for not doing research to disprove your own (badly supported) extraordinary claims.

In other words, it's up to you to prove your Bigfoot claims, not up to others to spend any effort to disprove them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom