Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
On second thought - the witness is probably an avid birder and isn't even lying at all. Here's how the logic goes...

A hoaxer or liar doesn't want to get caught so they research what avid birders say. Then they know not to say chirp and they don't. If you see a guy say chirp he isn't a liar or a hoaxer and you know that because he said chirp. A person who says calling or singing might be a hoaxer but maybe not.

The guy who says chirp isn't afraid of being caught in anything because he is telling the truth.
 
On third thought - a person may now wonder why the avid birder said chirp when avid birders wouldn't say chirp. Well the witness probably figured that his audience would include a lot of non-birders who are people who say chirp themselves. If you say calling to them they might think you are talking about birds making phone calls which would cause undue suspicion of you being a liar which you aren't.

The guy is honest and cares about the common man too.
 
The Shrike said:
Red flags for this birder . . .

1) Real birders never fall for the "woods went silent" schtick because we know that happens all the time.

2) Real birders never use the word "chirping" to describe the sounds birds make. We specify "singing" or "calling."

3) Real birders don't put a camera on a tripod when photographing in dense cover.

4) Real birders use automatic settings on our cameras, or we're good enough with manual settings that we're ready go for high speed and low light when we're in, you know, a palmetto/hardwood hammock in Florida.

You Sir, are no true birder!
Click to expand...

Thanks for weighing in here.

But I must admonish skeptics that just because he lied about every substantive point we can verify, ie his background, education, and employment - it does not follow he lied about the only remaining thing...seeing bigfoot.

Because look at all of these other thousand-odd reports without verifiable names attached to them. Police men, avid outdoorsmen/hunters, Indian trackers and headhunters...all of these impeccable credentials.
 
William Parcher said:
On third thought - a person may now wonder why the avid birder said chirp when avid birders wouldn't say chirp. Well the witness probably figured that his audience would include a lot of non-birders who are people who say chirp themselves. If you say calling to them they might think you are talking about birds making phone calls which would cause undue suspicion of you being a liar which you aren't.

The guy is honest and cares about the common man too.
Click to expand...

William Parcher is channeling Vizzini??? ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2y40U2LvKY
 
Last edited:
Bigfoot in Johor, Malaysia again.

Sia explained that what baffled the group further was that the "Bigfoot" tracks were accompanied by those of an elephant and a tiger.
Click to expand...


Johor Malaysia Nature Society chairman Vincent Chow said he received news of the "Bigfoot" prints the day it occurred, adding that it was quite impossible to be a prank because the footprints went on for more than 1km.

"It could be an upright bipedal primate that has yet to be discovered," he said, adding that there had been many sightings of these footprints, especially by the locals, but the authorities often did not take them seriously.
Click to expand...


Here is the website of Malaysian Nature Society which has the woo woo Vincent Chow as Johor Branch Chairman.
 

Attachments

  • main_ha_1705_p3a.jpg
    main_ha_1705_p3a.jpg
    92.5 KB · Views: 7
  • main_ha_1705_p3b.jpg
    main_ha_1705_p3b.jpg
    88.9 KB · Views: 5
AlaskaBushPilot said:
Must have gotten tiring, carrying the bucket of mud along to keep dipping the stompers in.
Click to expand...
I know that this was meant to be facetious - but you have put your finger on the major problem with these tracks.

Muddy tracks that continue on a clean tarmac road for nearly a km.

The last as clearly marked out on the road as the first.
 
They should set up a trail camera aimed at the basket to see who is the hoaxer.

ETA: It would be cool to set up a secret video recorder in their site. Then you could watch a team member put out the basket and then another team member "accept" the gifts. Then they post about the Bigfoot basket grabber and then you post the video. ROFL! Fun for the whole family.
 
Last edited:
William Parcher said:
On second thought - the witness is probably an avid birder and isn't even lying at all. Here's how the logic goes...

A hoaxer or liar doesn't want to get caught so they research what avid birders say. Then they know not to say chirp and they don't. If you see a guy say chirp he isn't a liar or a hoaxer and you know that because he said chirp. A person who says calling or singing might be a hoaxer but maybe not.

The guy who says chirp isn't afraid of being caught in anything because he is telling the truth.
Click to expand...

Then again he might be a chirp off the old block
 
Drewbot said:
http://www.teamsquatchinusa.com/ada...e-southern-oregon-habituation-area-june-2014/

A place called SOHA (South Oregon Habituation Area)

Adam Davies is there

They leave Gifting Baskets out in the woods

Lots of videos I can not watch in detail, but will when I get time.
If anyone does watch them, please describe them for those who cant.
Click to expand...

They go to a lot of trouble to feed the local wildlife, or a hoaxer, out of bowls.

One time they use bowls covered inside and out with double sided tape...

They apparently expect bigfoot hairs to be stuck to the tape.

It apparently hasn't occurred to them to point a camera at the bowls of food.

They also apparently haven't thought of a bird to explain the Cheeto mystery.
 
Last edited:
When the camera caught bears or raccoon eating the gifts, they would say "See, Bigfoot knew there was a camera there, and moved off, leaving it to the raccoon and bears."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom