Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Keep in mind the number of claims by Chris for these pics and vids in May of 2010:
Hi This is Chris Bennett over at the BFRPKY.com I thought I'd give you a heads up on the new KY pic being released today. Feel free to use this pic on your nonprofit website. (please remember to list credit for the pic) This is a sample of upcoming releases of information from my current research ongoing in KY. Videos will be out soon as well.

The info being released is from an ongoing study of a small group of creatures in KY. I can't release all the details at this time but I can tell you that this pic is a crop from a larger pic made 03-06-10 by myself while investigating a possible home range territory at an undisclosed location in KY. The pic was captured "by chance" with no real expectations of capturing anything on film that day. The larger 8.1 MP pic shows other "subjects" and is too much to release at this time. Most of the other "subjects" in the larger pic were hiding behind brush anyway so positive identification of them would be ambiguous to the average viewer with no previous knowledge of the area surroundings. This crop shows the only subject "out in plain site". The subject appears to me to be female, however the sex cannot be determined 100% in whole by the pic only so it will probably remain a debate to viewers. I can judge who's female and who's male because I get to see the creatures up very close at times and they have very different "features" between the male and female. My thoughts about this one being a female come from the shape of the head,face and oh yeas, the breasts.
There will also be at least 3 videos upcoming for release to the public. Videos are currently under review by Scientific professionals with an interest in Bigfoot/Sasquatch. The videos will show multiple creatures, a family group, many different sizes and colors. Release date will be decided after all reviews of the material are complete. More than likely, the info of what will be released will be announced in the near future on an upcoming internet radio show "The Squatchdetective" Steve Kull's show as he is also investigating and verifying the info we collect in the field for release.
I send you this info based on your just and honest report of Bigfoot groups. Too many are "for profit" and not "for finding" I'm doing alot of work with these creatures in Ky and completely self financed. It makes me sad to think the guys with all the funding are doing nothing but to continue to look without finding. Because as long as they look, they get paid

Best, Chris Bennett BFRPKY.com
Click to expand...

There are apparently lots of creatures in the 8.1mp picture.
One was in plain sight. That is, easily visible to anyone. Not hidden at all. Nothing blocking the view of it, etc.

The 8.1mp picture is now available at his web site.

The cropped pic shows the creature that was in plain sight. Again, this means out in the open and plainly visible.
This is that crop:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_P2YYB9zzGb0/S-fA4SJJHdI/AAAAAAAAAHk/_vFGXCVfiyE/s1600/PIC42CR.jpg

Chris is able to get very close to the creatures sometimes.
The male and female creatures show high sexual dimorphism.

There are 3 videos that have been reviewed by scientists.
Those 3 videos show a lot of creatures with various characteristics.

Steve Kulls is investigating Chris's claims and evidence.

*****

Chris has made some incredible claims in early 2010, which would prove that bigfoot exists if they were true, but he has yet to back up any of them.

We have yet to hear from any scientists that reviewed any BFRPKY videos, as far as I can tell.

I don't know what Kulls came up with in his investigation. I was not able to find a report.
 
Last edited:
Chris can play the victim card as often as he likes, but the fact remains that his own statements are far more damning than our most withering critiques.

Of course the multiple bigfoots are "different sizes and colors" - they're pareidolia.
 
dmaker said:
It looks like a smudge to me. You can seriously see something that looks like a gorilla?
Click to expand...

Yes just an ordinary gorilla, but I enlarged the picture to 400% to make it clearer to see. In fact I think I have seen the picture before in a rather different context.
 
Last edited:
Oakden said:
Yes just an ordinary gorilla, but I enlarged the picture to 400% to make it clearer to see. In fact I think I have seen the picture before in a rather different context.
Click to expand...

You enlarged a blurry photo to 400% and can see anything beyond blocks and pixels?
 
Oakden said:
Yes just an ordinary gorilla, but I enlarged the picture to 400% to make it clearer to see. In fact I think I have seen the picture before in a rather different context.
Click to expand...

Uh, no.
Enlarging the photo won't make it clearer - just the opposite.
 
I blew it up to 400% and cropped out what I am assuming is the gorilla you mentioned?

Capture2-L.png
 
dmaker said:
I blew it up to 400% and cropped out what I am assuming is the gorilla you mentioned?

[qimg]http://dmaker.smugmug.com/Misc/i-wKp8ZwW/0/L/Capture2-L.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Here's the problem: if you see as gorilla, it's partly because Oakden's post primed you up for it. I can sort of see a gorilla pattern if I ignore all the surrounding dark shadows
 
It was slightly clearer when I enlarged it. It is not a clear picture but it seems to show something whick looks like a gorillas head and shoulders with eyes and arm showing but the resolution is insufficient to be sure.
 
dmaker said:
I blew it up to 400% and cropped out what I am assuming is the gorilla you mentioned?

[qimg]http://dmaker.smugmug.com/Misc/i-wKp8ZwW/0/L/Capture2-L.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Well, now he's got gorillas, and panthers and footies . . . oh my.
 
When blow up larger like this, you can see that the "gorilla" is the same color as the background foliage. That should tell you that this is an excellent example of pareidolia. Also, the gorilla seems to have a large toad hugging a picture of Jesus on its rump. The poor gorilla also seems to have a very large goiter below its neck.

I love pareidolia. More fun than Where's Waldo.
 
Last edited:
Oakden said:
It was slightly clearer when I enlarged it. It is not a clear picture but it seems to show something whick looks like a gorillas head and shoulders with eyes and arm showing but the resolution is insufficient to be sure.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I blew it up to 400% too, but didn't crop it. If you take all the other shadows into account, King Kong is standing behind the puny ole gorilla.
 
Oakden said:
It was slightly clearer when I enlarged it. It is not a clear picture but it seems to show something whick looks like a gorillas head and shoulders with eyes and arm showing but the resolution is insufficient to be sure.
Click to expand...

What I take from this is, with pareidolia, you'd probably say "gorilla", and pareidolia is all there is.

But Chris, being a footer, says "bigfoot".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom