Lateral ejection of debris trash

Quad4_72 said:
A woowoo recently presented me with this video as to why debris could not have been ejected from the towers over great distances. What do you think?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7304846209709908270&hl=en
Click to expand...

What do they say did the deed? What a bunch of junk. I have seen a simple collision at the dinner table send thing flying across the room.

Only the building collasping in chaos would do what we saw on 9/11 with 248 tons of TNT energy released by gravity.

Just ask them if 248 tons of TNT would do the job. Then you have them because the energy was in the buildings.
 
beachnut said:
What do they say did the deed? What a bunch of junk. I have seen a simple collision at the dinner table send thing flying across the room.

Only the building collasping in chaos would do what we saw on 9/11 with 248 tons of TNT energy released by gravity.

Just ask them if 248 tons of TNT would do the job. Then you have them because the energy was in the buildings.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's key, since we saw no sign of explosives at the moment of collapse.

Show them the Trinity Church video which has a close-up of the bowing columns collapsing inward.
 
babazaroni said:
Yes, that's key, since we saw no sign of explosives at the moment of collapse.

Show them the Trinity Church video which has a close-up of the bowing columns collapsing inward.
Click to expand...
And we can't forget the other tower....

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
~enigma~ said:
And we can't forget the other tower....

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
Click to expand...

That's the same (south) tower ;)
 
What do they say? Explosives would have made a real big sound. I can not even think how explosives would be set up to eject anything like what happen.

Ask him how they put a 4 Ton girder cannon in the building? What will people fall for next.
 
Can anyone confirm that a 10-foot outer column piece can weigh 4-tons?

Remember, that the steel was thinner higher up in the towers.
 
Last edited:
~enigma~ said:
The video I posted is tower 1. North Tower is 1. South is 2. Trinity shows 2. Or is the video I posted named wrong?
Click to expand...

Since you embeded the video, I have no idea how it is called :)
But you can still see the North Tower standing near the end of the video. Also the damage before it collapses, reveales this is the South Tower.

ETA: Maybe the title reverse to the first tower that collapsed?
 
28th Kingdom said:
And, since there are two towers with different degrees of damage and different size upper masses, and only one of the upper masses tilted... but both towers collapsed in the exact same fashion... now, the ball is back in your court.
Click to expand...
so they collapsed in the exact same fashion...but only one upper mass tilted....so that means they didnt collapse itn eh exact same fashion, right?

good to see you still love your doublethink
 
Bell said:
Since you embeded the video, I have no idea how it is called :)
But you can still see the North Tower standing near the end of the video. Also the damage before it collapses, reveales this is the South Tower.

ETA: Maybe the title reverse to the first tower that collapsed?
Click to expand...

Here is the original video..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8564772103237441151&q=WTC&hl=en


I never paid much attention at the end but the antenna is there plain as day so maybe cameraplanet misnamed it?
 
~enigma~ said:
Here is the original video..

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8564772103237441151&q=WTC&hl=en


I never paid much attention at the end but the antenna is there plain as day so maybe cameraplanet misnamed it?
Click to expand...

Either that, or thye meant WTC1 is shown in the video...

Anyhow, about the 'Lateral ejection of debris trash', I made a post with ACII art a while ago, but can't find it. It was something like this:

Code: 
|        /        /        |        \        \
|       |        /        /        |        \
|       |       |        /       /         /
|       |       |       |       /       /
|       |       |       |      |      |
|       |       |       |      |      |
 
28th Kingdom said:
No, you are 100% wrong. Photographic evidence isn't scientific evidence. I have presented tons of video footage... and invariably I am asked to show the scientific proof behind my claims.

If NIST's report rests on nothing more than one video... than I can safely say their theory is not based in science.
Click to expand...

BS!

You make it obvious that you have NO idea what real "SCIENCE" is all about nor have you obviously read the NIST report.

Oh yea, you can't read this because you have me on ignore.

Bummer ;)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom