I agree, nothing seems to indicate that, he could just as well be distrustful of Silverstein because he is rich, or is an American.
But he sure wants him to be guilty of something.
Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....
- Thread starter Sizzler
- Start date
I agree, nothing seems to indicate that, he could just as well be distrustful of Silverstein because he is rich, or is an American.
But he sure wants him to be guilty of something.
Sorry....he was directly asked by me and instead of a simple yes or no, he gave me some bs. If that is enough proof for the AJ/ We Are Change crew, I can turn the same tables on him. Only he doesn't like it.
Sword_Of_Truth
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 8, 2006
- Messages
- 11,494
...except for the part where he has gone after a jewish businessman for no reason and with no evidence.
CHF
Illuminator
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,871
Well it was pretty dramatic for a while there, Sizzler.
It really looked like you were about to break the WTC7 conspiracy wide open with this.
Shame that none of if amounted to anything. Again.
Last edited:
Yes and we all have heard the first thing the truthers do is blame the joos/zionists/CFR/Bilderburg group...they are a bunch of nazi wannabes.
Since truthers question ALL the accounts which support the "official story", Jewish or otherwise, what reason do we have to suspect Sizzler's attempt to catch Silverstein in a lie has anything to do with his religion. Would not any truther jump at the chance to discover any part of the OS is fabricated?
Unless you have other evidence against Sizzler on this issue I see no reason to suspect him of be being an anti-Semite.
Last edited:
Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
I am sure others ahev already pointed out your ignorance on this point. But he did NOT say he spoke to Nigro. We assumed it was Nigro because he mentioned talking to one of the commanders. All this comment proves is that we were wrong in the exact person he was talking to. For you to now accuse him of lying is completely out of line.
Who the hell said RELIGION? Why do you guys assume by joo I am referring to Silverstein's religion or as Sizzler put it...who he worships?
Jonnyclueless
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 5,546
So in other words there were multiple conspiracies going on at the same exact time using the same exact event and the multiple parties were unaware of each others plots?????
Well, doesn't that just work out nice and conveniently for the CTers.
GStan
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 1,350
Yes. This thread has been specific to Silverstein. As far as I know, Sizzler has not yet put forth any complete conspiracy theory, so there is no reason yet to connect the specific arguments he's made in this thread to a 'conspiracy that the truther's claim'. When Sizzler does put forth a full theory, if it includes Silverstein as a co-conspirator, then you can claim that he has implicated him in a murder, and depending upon the quality of the argument, you can decide if the implications are baseless.
(So far, they promise to be pretty baseless Sizzler
)Why is it necessary to revisit this nonsense? Swing Dangler is a discredited liar. He posted exactly ZERO examples--as you know--of the phrase "pull it" being used to mean "blow up the building." He desperately attempted to palm off the all-purpose "pull down" as a synonym for the phrase that just doesn't mean what he desperately wants it to mean. He failed.
As is pointed out over and over, if we pretend that Silverstein is saying that there's been such a loss of life, maybe the best thing would be to blow up the building, we have inserted into Lucky Larry's mouth words that make absolutely no sense.
To recap, Swing Dangler's list exposed him as a charlatan. Nobody in the demolition business thinks that "pull it" has anything to do with the use of explosives. And the FDNY still doesn't blow up buildings.
Last edited:
So you are now telling me Sizzler isn't a truther? I call bs.Yes. This thread has been specific to Silverstein. As far as I know, Sizzler has not yet put forth any complete conspiracy theory, so there is no reason yet to connect the specific arguments he's made in this thread to a 'conspiracy that the truther's claim'. When Sizzler does put forth a full theory, if it includes Silverstein as a co-conspirator, then you can claim that he has implicated him in a murder, and depending upon the quality of the argument, you can decide if the implications are baseless.
(So far, they promise to be pretty baseless Sizzler
Yes I agree. Our assumptions were wrong and now that I know there were several commandors at WTC7, anyone of them could have talked to him.
Next step is to find out who called Larry.
OK, instead of religion, how about if I said 'his being a joo"? What evidence do you have that Sizzler is after him because he is a Jew? As far as I can see Sizzler is after the OS, like any good twoofer should. Some twoofers are clearly anti-Semetic but what evidence do we have that Sizzler is?
Besides his avoidance of a direct answer to my question about Silverstein being a joo, I am also finding him guilty by assosciation with other anti-semitic trash in the truth movement. If he is offended, he easily could choose other company to keep then he would only be judged on the idiocy he speaks. Actually, my evidence that Sizzler is anti-semitic is stronger than his admitted non-evidence that Silverstein lied. Now why did you assume I meant religion?
GStan
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
- Messages
- 1,350
WTF? You hate the seriously defective standards of proof of the AJ/WAC crew, (as do I), so in response you're going to teach Sizzler a lesson by lowering your standard of to proof to the level of the AJ/WAC crew?
