Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....

Sizzler

Graduate Poster
S
Joined
Jan 4, 2008
Messages
1,562
Larry makes some interesting remarks, and ommissions in this video.

1. He confirms a phone call with "a" fire chief.
2. He refuses to confirm who that fire chief was when told Nigro denied having any conversation with him.
3. He states that the North Tower's antenna ripped through WTC7 causing fuel fires which led to the collapse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8&eurl=http://911blogger.com/

My conclusion; Larry is a liar. Next question, why is he lying?
 
Sizzler said:
Larry makes some interesting remarks, and ommissions in this video.

1. He confirms a phone call with "a" fire chief.
2. He refuses to confirm who that fire chief was when told Nigro denied having any conversation with him.
3. He states that the North Tower's antenna ripped through WTC7 causing fuel fires which led to the collapse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtPC0W4HII8&eurl=http://911blogger.com/

My conclusion; Larry is a liar. Next question, why is he lying?
Click to expand...

This is quite a clip. Doesn't he also say that diesel fuel fed the fires? I'll have to review to get the exact quote.
 
firecoins said:
It must be an inside job because the Jews run everything
Click to expand...

Don't jump to conclusions!!!

Let first try to understand why Larry is lying about certain events that occurred on 9/11.

1. Why is he lying about a phone conversation that never took place?

2. Why does he know more about WTC7 collapse than NIST?
 
So what is the issue at hand here? That he might be wrong about the antenna? Wow, big case there. I can see the headlines now. "Twoofers find building owner wrong about his opinion on what happened to the antenna on the WTC". It will go down in history and you guys will finaly be famous.
 
Why would Larry Silverstein have any special knowledge about what the WTC antenna did?
 
I really don't care wether Larry SIlverstein told the truth or lied or however you intrepet his word. The fact is 9/11 was not an inside job.
 
Anti-sophist said:
About which part? And where's the evidence?
Click to expand...

He said he took a call from "a" fire chief. Nigro, denies any such call. Larry then refuses to reveal who the chief was that he spoke to.

Were there more than one chief that day? And at what point was it their responsibility to call Larry?

I think it is obvious that Larry is lying.
 
Last edited:
Sizzler said:
Larry makes some interesting remarks, and ommissions in this video.

1. He confirms a phone call with "a" fire chief.
2. He refuses to confirm who that fire chief was when told Nigro denied having any conversation with him.
3. He states that the North Tower's antenna ripped through WTC7 causing fuel fires which led to the collapse.
Click to expand...

He also overtly avoids answering Luke's question to clarify "pull it".
 
Sizzler said:
He said he took a call from "a" fire chief. Nigro, denies any such call. Larry then refuses to reveal who the chief was that he spoke to.

Where there more than one chief that day? And at what point was it their responsibility to call Larry?

I think it is obvious that Larry is lying.
Click to expand...
So Larry didn't agree to "pull it" with anyone?
 
Sizzler said:
Don't jump to conclusions!!!

Let first try to understand why Larry is lying about certain events that occurred on 9/11.

1. Why is he lying about a phone conversation that never took place?

2. Why does he know more about WTC7 collapse than NIST?
Click to expand...


You are incapable of grasping a very simple fact: Larry Silverstien owned property that was destroyed on 9/11/01. He did nothing wrong--absolutely nothing. He committed no crime; he isn't suspected of committing a crime. He had no conceivable reason to want his buildings demolished. He didn't profit from their destruction.

1. Why are you lying about a phone conversation you know nothing about?

2. Why are you falsely claiming that he knows anything of significance about the collapse of WTC 7?

It's long past time for conspiracy liars to let Larry go. Either link him to your imaginary conspiracy, or accuse the FDNY of complicity in the unprecedented crime, or just walk away. Enough is enough.
 
Sizzler said:
Lets not derail this thread;)
Click to expand...


By its very nature, the thread invites derailment. You are focusing on a property owner who suffered heavy losses in the jihadist attacks of 9/11/01. Unscrupulous liars peddling fantastic myths have slandered this man with baseless and farfetched accusations. He did nothing wrong.
 
bofors said:
He also overtly avoids answering Luke's question to clarify "pull it".
Click to expand...

Liar.

Silverstein's spokesperson, Mr. McQuillan, later clarified:

"In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building."
Click to expand...

Link.
 
pomeroo said:
You are incapable of grasping a very simple fact: Larry Silverstien owned property that was destroyed on 9/11/01. He did nothing wrong--absolutely nothing. He committed no crime; he isn't suspected of committing a crime. He had no conceivable reason to want his buildings demolished. He didn't profit from their destruction.

1. Why are you lying about a phone conversation you know nothing about?

2. Why are you falsely claiming that he knows anything of significance about the collapse of WTC 7?

It's long past time for conspiracy liars to let Larry go. Either link him to your imaginary conspiracy, or accuse the FDNY of complicity in the unprecedented crime, or just walk away. Enough is enough.
Click to expand...

1. What am I lying about exactly?

2. Larry describes, in the clip I posted, that the North Tower Antenna broke fuel lines in WTC7.

Where are my lies exactly.

ps. At least Gravy is a man of his word....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom