Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

uncle applehead said:
or: "Rick Gibney and the Happy Hooligans shot down Flight 93, which was supposed to hit building seven, which HAS to come down because of all the information in there we absolutely have to destroy, so pull it and we'll explain it later. When we're done with these people they'll believe anything. Even Chris Mathews and the Amazing Randi will laugh at the usual 'conspiracy theorists’.
Click to expand...

But that makes no sense, why would they bring down a building to destroy the information in it when they could just destroy the information itself and avoid this whole WTC7 conspiracy?
 
Gicks said:
But that makes no sense, why would they bring down a building to destroy the information in it when they could just destroy the information itself and avoid this whole WTC7 conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Don't be so logical!

And welcome to the forum :)
 
Gicks said:
But that makes no sense, why would they bring down a building to destroy the information in it when they could just destroy the information itself and avoid this whole WTC7 conspiracy?
Click to expand...

That is not conspiratorial enough for the truthers. They need evil and Machiavellian plots.
 
Look, the logic of The Illuminati is inscrutable and ineffable; when they decide to use a complicated plan involving thousands of personnel and thousands of counts of murder with a good chance it wouldn't even work instead of using a shredder, who are we to question them?
 
000063 said:
Look, the logic of The Illuminati is inscrutable and ineffable; when they decide to use a complicated plan involving thousands of personnel and thousands of counts of murder with a good chance it wouldn't even work instead of using a shredder, who are we to question them?
Click to expand...

We are not worthy.
 
Gicks said:
But that makes no sense, why would they bring down a building to destroy the information in it when they could just destroy the information itself and avoid this whole WTC7 conspiracy?
Click to expand...

Because they had the MSM who would not investigate it thoroughly and the Bush administration to delay, hinder, and whitewash any investigations.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Because they had the MSM who would not investigate it thoroughly and the Bush administration to delay, hinder, and whitewash any investigations.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer his question, Clayton. Why did they destroy a building instead of use a paper shredder? Would the MSM more likely investigate paper shredding they never witnessed, or a building collapse? Would the Bush administration have anything to delay, hinder and whitewash if there were no papers?
 
Whats more, how could they guarantee the collapse of building 7 would even destroy the information? Why would that information even be in building 7? What information could it possibly be?
 
There's also the tiny little fact that there was no way to make sure that WTC 1's collapse wouldn't disrupt whatever explosives were set. It was and is physically impossible.
 
twinstead said:
'MSM' is the truther's bogey man
Click to expand...

That's the feeling I get. "MSM" seems so much more simple and clean than having to list the thousands of newspapers, news radio and tv stations, with 10's of thousands of reporters who would really, really like to break a story as big as a 9/11 Inside Job.
 
LSSBB said:
Maybe Clayton means the Meritorious Service Medal. :D
Click to expand...

I would be very surprised if Clayton even knew what he means.

Anyway, back on topic: I still claim "pull it" is the dumbest claim to come out of 9/11 Truthers. And I find it very telling that Richard Gage uses this in his PP presentation.
 
cantonear1968 said:
I would be very surprised if Clayton even knew what he means.

Anyway, back on topic: I still claim "pull it" is the dumbest claim to come out of 9/11 Truthers. And I find it very telling that Richard Gage uses this in his PP presentation.
Click to expand...

It is so bewildering in its stupidity that it would barely warrant comment were it not for the persistence of its invocation.
 
cantonear1968 said:
I still claim "pull it" is the dumbest claim to come out of 9/11 Truthers. And I find it very telling that Richard Gage uses this in his PP presentation.
Click to expand...

mmm it's up there, I would say however the whole BBC "prediction" of 7's collapse is the dumbest claim ever claimed in the history of dumbass truther claims
 
cjnewson88 said:
mmm it's up there, I would say however the whole BBC "prediction" of 7's collapse is the dumbest claim ever claimed in the history of dumbass truther claims
Click to expand...

Hullo? Holographic planes? WTC build with explosives installed? ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom