Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

7 is diagnosed by a non-engineer at the scene as being poised to collapse - check

But remember, guys, truthers can use non-controlled demolition experts to support controlled demolition theories!

Got it! Good! Great!
 
But remember, guys, truthers can use non-controlled demolition experts to support controlled demolition theories!

Got it! Good! Great!

Even though it was an engineer working the transit. They get nothing right! sigh
 
Why? Can only speculate, but probably to destroy the structure sometime in the future.

When? Speculation again, but possibly when it was built, or possibly when it was remodeled as Guiliani's 'bunker'.

How? Speculation once again, but I assume by humans.

Alibi? Speculation - property developement, sensitive government contents, etc.

That's pathetic even for a truther. Go back to the bong and try again.
 
DB is a huge international bank :boxedin:. My friend worked there in the 90s. We used to get Yankees tickets and town car service for free! Of course they were in on it! :D

Duly noted, I digress. I can't wait for this fall. I am planning on heading to NY to check out the 9/11 memorial and hit a few Yanks games.
 
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

I saw a demolition on television recently. Same M.O..

Really.

I guess you weren't smart enough to tell the difference then.

Here's another, let us know when you clue in:

 
Last edited:
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

Interesting. Then it shouldn't be a problem at all for you to provide a link to this tape.
 
Wow... way to show off them truther research skills. The estimates were far higher than 3,00 at that time. You find it odd that the FDNY would call up the owner of a building & say something like "Look, we can't get any lines on the fire in 7 & we're not gonna try. We're just going to have to let it burn."

Really? That seems odd to you?

What seems odd is the quote you just grabbed out of thin air.

MM
 
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

I saw a demolition on television recently. Same M.O..

Sigh. No there is no sound in the collapse of WTC7 that resembles an explosive demolition.

We have multiple recordings of varying distances from WTC7 and none pick up any such sounds. I challenge you to find a video of WTC7 collapsing and a demolition with an equivalent audio signature. You won't find it, but feel free to try. You also said they would have used something like C4, well theres plenty of video which can show you what C4 sounds like. Take your pick.

I'll say this though, the sound of WTC7's collapse does match a method of controlled demolition. A method that does not involve explosives. Verinage. ;)
 
Last edited:
"Sigh. No there is no sound in the collapse of WTC7 that resembles an explosive demolition."

NIST released it...go find it.
 
"Sigh. No there is no sound in the collapse of WTC7 that resembles an explosive demolition."

NIST released it...go find it.

I've seen the video you're talking about, as I said go find a video of WTC7 collapsing and a demolition with an equivalent audio signature.I double dare you. No truther has ever done it, most dont even try. Thats why truthers like to show WTC7 compared with a demolition with the sound turned off. So whatdoya say? Find a demolition that sounds as quiet as WTC7's collapse.
 
Last edited:
I've seen the video you're talking about, go find a real demolition that sounds anything like that. I double dare you. No truther has ever done it, most dont even try. Thats why truthers like to show WTC7 compared with a demolition with the sound turned off.

Then you know what I am saying is true. Finally an honest answer.
 
Still waiting Kree!!


Do you accept that there WAS reason to pull everyone away from WTC7 when it was considered a collapse risk?
 
Last edited:
Then you know what I am saying is true. Finally an honest answer.

Please tell me how on earth you managed to get from my post that I agree with you? :eek: Are you just reading what you want to read now?

I said it sounds nothing like a demolition, go find a demolition that sounds as quiet as the WTC7 collapse. You won't, because you know you cant. Thats why guys like AE911 compare WTC7 to a demolition ON MUTE, they dont let you hear the sound because they know that WTC7 sounds nothing like a real demolition.
 
Last edited:
"Sigh. No there is no sound in the collapse of WTC7 that resembles an explosive demolition."

NIST released it...go find it.

Richard Gage admitted his research is fake.

Go find it.
 

Back
Top Bottom