Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

My bolding.

Why?
When?
How?
What would be the 'alibi' for the CD collapse? Debris impact and fire?
What if the 'alibi' had never come to pass? No impact. No fire.

I don't expect you to answer - no Truther ever has.

Why? Can only speculate, but probably to destroy the structure sometime in the future.

When? Speculation again, but possibly when it was built, or possibly when it was remodeled as Guiliani's 'bunker'.

How? Speculation once again, but I assume by humans.

Alibi? Speculation - property developement, sensitive government contents, etc.
 
Last edited:
Courtesy calls on 9/11.

3,000 deaths but we should call this building owner and advise him that we are going to let his empty building burn.

Yeah right.

That we should pretend we made the call and pretend we had that conversation and alert the whole world to the CT.

Yeah right.

Which is more likely, MM?
 
When? Speculation again, but possibly when it was built,.

No hope for you.

You think its possible they installed super secret nano thermite and other explosives into the building in 1987. ....You sure believe and entertain all kinds of fanciful things but cant see any reasonable scenario right in front of you :rolleyes:

Once again btw,

Do you accept that there WAS reason to pull everyone away from WTC7 when it was considered a collapse risk?
 
Last edited:
No hope for you.

You think its possible they installed super secret nano thermite and other explosives into the building in 1987. ....You sure believe and entertain all kinds of fanciful things but cant see any reasonable scenario right in front of you :rolleyes:

Once again btw,

Do you accept that there WAS reason to pull everyone away from WTC7 when it was considered a collapse risk?

You speculate that it was super secret nano thermite? Why?

"You think its possible they installed super secret nano thermite and other explosives into the building in 1987."

No. The technology for that stuff wasn't around until the nineties. C-4 was around in the '80s, tnt, stuff like that. (to my knowledge)

Edited to add: Whatever is was. It worked!
 
Last edited:
Courtesy calls on 9/11.

3,000 deaths but we should call this building owner and advise him that we are going to let his empty building burn.

Yeah right.

MM
Wow... way to show off them truther research skills. The estimates were far higher than 3,00 at that time. You find it odd that the FDNY would call up the owner of a building & say something like "Look, we can't get any lines on the fire in 7 & we're not gonna try. We're just going to have to let it burn."

Really? That seems odd to you?
 
You speculate that it was super secret nano thermite? Why?

Edited to add: Whatever is was. It worked!

That is what truthers are claiming. Are you saying that you do not believe that? Why was WTC7's collapse so quiet, your magical nano thermite cutter charges weren't involved?

And again...

Do you accept that there WAS reason to pull everyone away from WTC7 when it was considered a collapse risk?

Why wont you answer my question Kree? What is so hard about accepting this?
 
Last edited:
"Why was WTC7's collapse so quiet"

Quiet? I don't think there was anything quiet about it. Perhaps you can speculate for us how quiet it was?
 
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

I saw a demolition on television recently. Same M.O..
 
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

I saw a demolition on television recently. Same M.O..

Boom? Link?
 
NIST released a tape recently. It shows 7 before implosion. There's a loud boom, the penthouse falls, then the cacaphony of demolition. Nothing quiet about it.

Usually controlled demolitions have a sequence of detonations, not just one.
 
Noone fighting fires in WTC7 - check

Fighting fire across the street - check

7 is diagnosed by a non-engineer at the scene as being poised to collapse - check

Memos sent to media that 7 is going to collapse - check

Silverstein is called to get his input on whether to 'pull it' - check (?)

Wow. Do you even know the full quote?

And then THEY decided.

They is FDNY.

The call to Larry wasn't to ask for his opinion. It was a courtesy to him, as the building owner, to inform him that his building was most likely not going to survive the day.

It's common practice in the fire service.

In fact, fire departments can look up an address in their computer, and get the registered owner's information. Just for this purpose.
 
Wow. Do you even know the full quote?

And then THEY decided.

They is FDNY.

The call to Larry wasn't to ask for his opinion. It was a courtesy to him, as the building owner, to inform him that his building was most likely not going to survive the day.

It's common practice in the fire service.

In fact, fire departments can look up an address in their computer, and get the registered owner's information. Just for this purpose.
His last building you should say. (IMO)

I'm sure they called the owners of the Deutsche Bank Building and Verizon to let them know what was going on too.

I wonder if they told DB that they ran out of thermites so it'll have to be deconstructed later. :rolleyes:
 
His last building you should say. (IMO)

I'm sure they called the owners of the Deutsche Bank Building and Verizon to let them know what was going on too.

I wonder if they told DB that they ran out of thermites so it'll have to be deconstructed later. :rolleyes:

Please, DB wasn't in on it. Unlike Silverstein they have to PAY to have their work done. No freebies unless you're part of the NWO.
 
Please, DB wasn't in on it. Unlike Silverstein they have to PAY to have their work done. No freebies unless you're part of the NWO.

DB is a huge international bank :boxedin:. My friend worked there in the 90s. We used to get Yankees tickets and town car service for free! Of course they were in on it! :D
 

Back
Top Bottom