Lol. Using your standard of "proof", I think I can "prove" in fact, that Travis was working from no source, due to the fact that he didn't provide any.
You made a claim, and now you're trying to divert the burden of proof. Predictable.
But to play your idiot's game, the subject was the extent of asbestos fireproofing. In response to
my reply to Travis's post in 533, you said:
I have asked you to provide citations to these studies on the extent of the asbestos fireproofing. You have not done so.
I was not making a claim about research on asbestos. I said so about three times now, and you literally just quote-mined that part out of my post.
It may have been irrelevant as a response to your post, which I freely admit, but it was not incorrect.
I find it strange how you do not quote your post, so we can see my response in context.
But I'm sure you'll turn this into some kind of epic back and forth, in which "ergo refuses" to answer "any" of your questions,
You have not done so in this post. And you have quote-mined. Again. In addition to my statement about the claim you were making, you are ignoring my statement about the steelworkers, and request for evidence about the "inappropriate hastiness" of debris removal.
à la the sundials "debate".
You mean the one where you scoffed at 911myths for using calculations and information from the
US Naval Observatory, and I asked you to make your position clear, and you studiously avoided doing so?
Yes, I remember. The successive posts are an excellent example of me turning your so-called "arguments" inside out. That was less of a "back and forth" and more of a "run away and hide".
It's also an excellent example of your usual habit of avoiding direct assertions, because whenever you do make them, they are invariably smacked down, such as your ludicrous theory in this thread which posits that a billionaire real estate tycoon would rather risk terrorism charges than renovate a building.
I have you on my Ignore list for a reason.
Because I and my signature embarrass you and ask I usually questions you don't like to answer. So you do what you always do with inconvenient truths;
pretend it doesn't exist.
As for Noah, both he and I are making the same points, and you're ignoring both of us. In fact, you made a half-measure attempt to "creatively misunderstand" one of my posts, then cropped it out entirely when I avoided your straw man. For him, you just declared him irrelevant. Not what he was asking. Him. Ad hominem, as usual. Why would anyone respond to questions he's asking
you, specifically? Don't you think it's odd how many people seem to "not understand" what's being discussed, while you apparently
always do?
Ergo slowly backs away from the thread and quietly opens the back door and slinks out, hoping nobody notices....
After dropping a smoke bomb.
At least, I hope it's smoke.
