Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

[NoahFence]

You've heard of photoshop, haven't you?

It's a powerful program that allows nitwits to combine whatever images they want, for the intent of demeaning and conflating all skepticism toward 9/11.

Lovely, isn't it?

Unlike Microsoft word, which can be used to type demeaning content such as "Larry Silverstein made out like a Bandit".

It comes with a spell checker, but unfortunately not a fact checker.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

You've heard of photoshop, haven't you?

It's a powerful program that allows nitwits to combine whatever images they want, for the intent of demeaning and conflating all skepticism toward 9/11.

Lovely, isn't it?

Much like youtube is abused by twoofers? BTW I used MS Paint....its ubiquitous, free and good enough put the point across............and Red, Caricature is a perfectly acceptable form of communication when it aims at things you choose to be, ie a intellectual zombie and an anti semite as opposed to things you cannot choose, like your race, sex etc.
You choose to keep beliefs you cannot back up (making out like a bandit) and really foul ones like anti semitism so you cannot reasonably whine when people call you out on them.

 

[Travis]

So Larry was somewhat deceptive to make him look better, but you take him at his word when he says "it" means a plural group of firefighters. Got it. Do you see the contortions you have to go through to make sense of Larry's bizarre comments?

I don't have to take his word for it. The context of the statement along with other established facts of the day make it perfectly clear what he meant. Only those that continue to wage war on reality think it meant anything else.

Lucky Larry is talking to ONE person and then he, Lucky Larry, says THEY made a decision?

Give me a name of a person who profited from 9/11 and was also instrumental in carrrying it out.
If you don't mind, a little sourcing would do well, too.

Larry A. Silverstein in the fine tradition of the B. Madoffs of the world.


http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/silverstein.html

What a load of crap.

Here are few things to consider:

• Rebuilding costs exceeded the insurance payouts long ago.
• The Port Authority was able to strongarm Silverstein away from the WTC1.
• The day the buildings fell he lost all the active ongoing money from leases.
• He has been paying rent to the Port Authority for a an empty pit while the Port Authority takes its sweet time rebuilding the below ground infrastructure

Check out this thread for much discussion on just how screwed over Silverstein was by the attacks.

 

[Edx]

Lovely, isn't it?

Yes, I also find it cute that you think if a building collapses the only danger to a person is if they are inside it, if they just step out of the building onto the street they'll be fine.

 

[The Big Dog]

You've heard of photoshop, haven't you?

It's a powerful program that allows nitwits to combine whatever images they want, for the intent of demeaning and conflating all skepticism toward 9/11.

Lovely, isn't it?

Lulz.

Yeah, that ship kinda sailed when you said you were "bored," champ.

Red has plenty of time to whine that he and his buddies are being treated unfairly, but not so much when it comes to actually supporting his defamatory comments with evidence.

Crocodile tears....

 

[ozeco41]

Unlike Microsoft word, which can be used to type demeaning content such as "Larry Silverstein made out like a Bandit".

It comes with a spell checker, but unfortunately not a fact checker.

Neat.

It's about time the resident "dog in the manger" was impounded.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

It's a powerful program that allows nitwits to combine whatever images they want, for the intent of demeaning and conflating all skepticism toward 9/11.

You had the opportunity in this very thread to reject and distance yourself from one of the most virulent anti-semites to post in this forum and what was it you said?...

Yeah. 4 or 5 billion dollars is making out like a bandit. Especially when he didn't even own the two towers. He's nothing but a crook surrounded by other zionist jew crooks.

You don't have to single out Zionists jews. I'm pretty sure Larry associated himself with all sorts of types to cement his relationship as greediest, most unscrupulous real estate tycoon in the city.

...you joined with him in an assault on an innocent member of the jewish community. Unless you do something to substantially differentiate yourself from the Hitler-huggers, I see no reason to assume that both you and Clayton represent the twoofer movement.

You may as well change your screen name to "RedArmband".

 

[NoahFence]

Iwonder if any of these self proclaimed Jew haters ever actually got wronged by one.somehow I doubt out.

 

[Clayton Moore]

You had the opportunity in this very thread to reject and distance yourself from one of the most virulent anti-semites to post in this forum and what was it you said?...



...you joined with him in an assault on an innocent member of the jewish community. Unless you do something to substantially differentiate yourself from the Hitler-huggers, I see no reason to assume that both you and Clayton represent the twoofer movement.

You may as well change your screen name to "RedArmband".

So all Jewish people are Zionists and almost by default neocons?

 

[BasqueArch]

RI slanders Silverstein

Originally Posted by RedIbis
You don't have to single out Zionists. I'm pretty sure Larry associated himself with all sorts of types to cement his relationship as greediest, most unscrupulous real estate tycoon in the city.

Originally Posted by 16.5
And just to think, rather than reading it you could have come up with evidence to support your now laughably false claims that Silverstein received a windfall and "made out like a bandit."

I mean a couple of years ago, perhaps, those were just silly statements. But your dogged determination to ignore them since then has turned them into two great millstones that you drag around the forum with you.

And every snarky post devoid of substance is like a huge dish of hypocrisy with a healthy side of irony.

It's like his own personal Chappaquiddick

Red "Chappy" Ibis

 

[BasqueArch]

So all Jewish people are Zionists and almost by default neocons?

CM means well, RI . It's present company excepted, of course.

If these nutsoids take over you'll be the first to go, remember? Or have you forgotten

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

So all Jewish people are Zionists and almost by default neocons?

When used by deniers of The Holocaust and other nazi sympathisers, "zionist" means "jew".

 

[BasqueArch]

Originally Posted by RedIbis
You don't have to single out Zionists. I'm pretty sure Larry associated himself with all sorts of types to cement his relationship as greediest, most unscrupulous real estate tycoon in the city.

Have you no shame to slander an innocent, respectable man.
Silverstein is a successful real estate businessman because he worked hard, took risks and negotiated right. His dream as a realtor in Manhattan, the art, at an already wealthy age 70 in 2001 was to own the 99 year lease to the WTC.

He has earned respect and admiration for his success, not your cheap calumny.

 

[ergo]

Here are few things to consider:

[*]Rebuilding costs exceeded the insurance payouts long ago.

Rebuilding from an insurance windfall is much less costly than if he had had to wait for leases to end, demolish the buildings himself, then rebuild.

There were undoubtedly other reasons why he wanted them down, but two of them may be that the towers required asbestos abatement, and there has been some suggestion that rewiring them for fibre optics with the existing t/c infrastructure was going to be problematic.

[*]The Port Authority was able to strongarm Silverstein away from the WTC1.

No idea what this is referring to.

[*]The day the buildings fell he lost all the active ongoing money from leases.

As I said above, waiting for leases to run out and the building to slowly empty would have cost much more. These costs may also have been included in the insurance claim.

[*]He has been paying rent to the Port Authority for a an empty pit while the Port Authority takes its sweet time rebuilding the below ground infrastructure

I have no doubt the PA has been giving him a good deal, in addition to the fact that all these considerations would not only be tax write-offs but may again have been included in the insurance claim.

He was awarded two claims for two separate "acts of terror". Yes, I think he did make out like a bandit.



"The Process of Creating a Ruin" In 1999's Divided We Stand, author Eric Darton speculated on the World Trade Center's demise -- literally and economically:

From an economic standpoint, the trade center -- subsidized since its inception -- has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace... When the World Trade Center was bombed in February, 1993, at the age of twenty, it had finally begun generating profits to offset the chronic losses the PA sustained running the PATH commuter line. But it was already passing its prime as office space, overtaken by a generation of more recent, cybernetically "smart" buildings with higher ceilings and greater built-in electrical capacity. To maintain the trade center as class-A office space commanding top rents, the PA would have had to spend $800 million rebuilding its electrical, electronic communications, and cooling systems.

Then came the bombing and, according to Charles Maikish, former director of the PA's World Trade Center Department, a repair bill of $700 million and hundreds of millions in lost revenues.

 

[NoahFence]

Are you kidding? He wanted them to come down for fiber optics? Is there no end to the retarded stupidity???

 

[tsig]

Rebuilding from an insurance windfall is much less costly than if he had had to wait for leases to end, demolish the buildings himself, then rebuild.

There were undoubtedly other reasons why he wanted them down, but two of them may be that the towers required asbestos abatement, and there has been some suggestion that rewiring them for fibre optics with the existing t/c infrastructure was going to be problematic.




No idea what this is referring to.




As I said above, waiting for leases to run out and the building to slowly empty would have cost much more. These costs may also have been included in the insurance claim.




I have no doubt the PA has been giving him a good deal, in addition to the fact that all these considerations would not only be tax write-offs but may again have been included in the insurance claim.

He was awarded two claims for two separate "acts of terror". Yes, I think he did make out like a bandit.



"The Process of Creating a Ruin" In 1999's Divided We Stand, author Eric Darton speculated on the World Trade Center's demise -- literally and economically:

He was planning on rebuilding them when he got to be 169 years old?

 

[tsig]

Are you kidding? He wanted them to come down for fiber optics? Is there no end to the retarded stupidity???

Just like they demolished the White House so they could install electricity. O wait....

 

[sheeplesnshills]

Rebuilding from an insurance windfall is much less costly than if he had had to wait for leases to end, demolish the buildings himself, then rebuild.

This is just insane.....the payoff was LESS than the rebuild cost plus loss of rents......

There were undoubtedly other reasons why he wanted them down, but two of them may be that the towers required asbestos abatement, and there has been some suggestion that rewiring them for fibre optics with the existing t/c infrastructure was going to be problematic.
As I said above, waiting for leases to run out and the building to slowly empty would have cost much more. These costs may also have been included in the insurance claim.
I have no doubt the PA has been giving him a good deal, in addition to the fact that all these considerations would not only be tax write-offs but may again have been included in the insurance claim.
He was awarded two claims for two separate "acts of terror". Yes, I think he did make out like a bandit.

911 Twoof in a nutshell. Its all just XXXX pulled out of your collected XXX's

 

[Justin39640]

One thing I never get about this debate. How can you simultaneously think it was Bush and the Jews trying to control the world through oil wars and at the same time accuse Larry for pulling an insurance scam? It's almost like they treat it as two separate events. To this day I've never seen a coherent link between Larry and his alleged high level involvement (got to be up there to be blowing **** up personally) with the evil leaders of the free world.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

[...] and there has been some suggestion that rewiring them for fibre optics with the existing t/c infrastructure was going to be problematic.

So the easier option was to blow the buildings up and rebuild them from scratch? How does that not sound retarded to you? "My girlfriend has this mildly annoying quirk. Rather than put some effort into working around that quirk, I think I'll just kill her."