• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kirk Cameron defends Todd Akin

Spindrift said:
What could possibly be gained by talking to anyone about Rush Limbaugh?
Click to expand...

Just a sociological experiment to test whether Democrats are capable of hate.

I remember a quote from about ten years ago where someone said, "The scariest thing about Rush Limbaugh is that 40% of Democrats think he should not be allowed to speak."
 
aggle-rithm said:
Just a sociological experiment to test whether Democrats are capable of hate.
Click to expand...
Has anyone ever posited that Democrats are not capable of hate?

aggle-rithm said:
I remember a quote from about ten years ago where someone said, "The scariest thing about Rush Limbaugh is that 40% of Democrats think he should not be allowed to speak."
Click to expand...

And who made that up? Rush himself? Who believes that?
 
Spindrift said:
Has anyone ever posited that Democrats are not capable of hate?
Click to expand...

Not in so many words, no.

And who made that up? Rush himself? Who believes that?
Click to expand...

IIRC, it was a well-known journalist. He was quoting a survey, and commenting on the fact that it's unsettling to think that people who are normally champions of human rights can consider taking away the right to free speech because they strongly disagree with it.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Not in so many words, no.



IIRC, it was a well-known journalist. He was quoting a survey, and commenting on the fact that it's unsettling to think that people who are normally champions of human rights can consider taking away the right to free speech because they strongly disagree with it.
Click to expand...

A survey worded to get just that result, no doubt. Rush can blather all he wants, I just won't listen.
 
Octavo said:
And if you needed any further proof that Kirk Cameron is a complete idiot, I present the following jewel:

http://www.politico.com/multimedia/video/2012/08/kirk-cameron-defends-todd-akin.html
Click to expand...

Probably due to the awe in which they hold bananas because they fit perfectly into their "nether regions" thus proving god's creation of the perfect fruit (per Kirk on a number of occasions.). *










*OK, it seems gross, but it's perfectly fine - until they start switching bananas between themselves.........rapidly. Then, it is just gross.
 
CynicalSkeptic said:
Democrats hate god, money and guns.
Click to expand...

Wait.....we hate money now?

Why wasn't I told this?





I think we can break down the party schism as such right now: Democrats love women. Republicans love to tell women what to do.
 
Travis said:
Wait.....we hate money now?

Why wasn't I told this?


I think we can break down the party schism as such right now: Democrats love women. Republicans love to tell women what to do.
Click to expand...



No, no, no... you're just too lazy to work and want to take other peoples money.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Not in so many words, no.
Click to expand...
In other words, no one has ever said that Democrats are not capable of hate.

aggle-rithm said:
IIRC, it was a well-known journalist. He was quoting a survey, and commenting on the fact that it's unsettling to think that people who are normally champions of human rights can consider taking away the right to free speech because they strongly disagree with it.
Click to expand...
But you can't remember this well-known journalists name? Sounds like something Rush would make up.

The right to free speech is about the government curtailing speech. There is nothing about the general public wanting a bloviating bag of hate speech to cease.
 
CynicalSkeptic said:
Democrats hate god, money and guns.
Click to expand...

Have definitely not read many of my posts. I am about as much a democrat as you can get.
AND: I do not hate dog, it does not exist and hating something that does not exist is pointless at best. IF it existed, I would hate it as a torturer and murderer - but it isn't so it isn't because it just does not exist. I like money and have no problem accepting it - if I can get it without hurting others who are not evil republickers making/trying to make laws that let them steal from others with no penalties. I really enjoy guns (and knives and Bows and arrows, and spears.....and have several of all - except the bows and spears).

Thus I refute your statement /definition of Democrats. And, I also refute Beelzey.:D
 
I don't had dog either.

I just wish he'd stop it with that damned tv show.
 
aggle-rithm said:
Not in so many words, no.



IIRC, it was a well-known journalist. He was quoting a survey, and commenting on the fact that it's unsettling to think that people who are normally champions of human rights can consider taking away the right to free speech because they strongly disagree with it.
Click to expand...

Until I see the actual poll questions, I'm calling BS on the percentage being as high as 40.
 
I find it ironic that a Democrat can claim that Democrats don't hate groups while making hateful statements about groups.

Republicans don't believe it's the government's job to engage in certain charitable and protective acts that Democrats believe are necessary for minorities and women.

But hatred? No. Hating others has always been a Democrat speciality.
 
AvalonXQ said:
I find it ironic that a Democrat can claim that Democrats don't hate groups while making hateful statements about groups.
Click to expand...

Rush Limbaugh has weight issues, certainly, but it's a little unfair to call him a "group", don't you think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom