Merged Key for theory of everything?!?

[Pixie of key]

Omega=1

The supporters of the modern physics have often wondered how all the four separate forces have exactly the same power. Why does the space expand as it does? We talk about the so called omega, that should be nearly the same as one or maybe even sharply one. We make questions if it is a bit under one or a bit over one. Does the universe expand forever in accelerative speed or does it begin to reduce ect.

If even one of the so called four separate forces would be even slightly different as it is, the universe as it nowadays is observed would´t have born.

According to my theory the omega is automatically so near the number one and this is proved if you are able to internalize these sites.

There exists only one force and it is the pressure. Everything else is based on the variation of the pressure.

 

[Pixie of key]

Pioneer- probes

An unexplained acceleration towards the sun has been observed with the Pioneer-sounders. If it would be observed that the sounders have the same kind of unexplained acceleration away from the sun, it would similar to the expanding of space in a Big Bang-theory. Apparently the space is assumed to expand somewhere far away from us (?).

Maybe in the universe according to my theory there is nothing unexplainable in the acceleration of the Pioneer-sounders. Maybe the energysea opening from the sun does not push so strongly the sounders away from the sun the
farther the sounders are from the sun.

This means that the space itself does not expand or curve. The energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves in a space that does not expand or curve.

 

[Pixie of key]

Sunspots

Dots of the sun

Approximately in eleven years distance the visible universe rubs itself against the energywaves coming towards and the energybudles in these waves burn out inside the sun. They make there a bigger pressure than normally. That makes the the energywaves open up from the centre of the sun towards the surface of the sun like a stream towards a same area (just like the water in a rainy day goes in a track made of sawdust).

Now the powerful energypulse flows out of the sun in a same area. When the influx stops, leaves the energystream on or many sundots as a mark to a relatively same area. Also in the tracks made of sawdust one can see several streams side by side.

When energybudles go inside the sun there could be formed new atoms of heavy substances like in coldfusion. They could clean the energywaves that open up from the expanding atomcores with them. Now the atomcores expand close to each other, but they don´t push each other away for a while.

A powerful energystream could bring the new atoms of a heavy substance far away from the sun.

 

[Mashuna]

Oh dear, another random theory of everything, posted across various science, physics and youtube message boards.

 

[Pixie of key]

Thank you again and sorry about my style!

I am sorry about my terrible english. Lets try first that way. I have lot of text in pages http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2 and here it is map for pages http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/296

We have also some videos in youtube with english, spain, katalonia and two videos with french

English

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace

spain and katalonia

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=xavialmar


Also i like to say that. Nobody cant see space. We can see how star energy changing to not so density energy. 5 billion years ago all energy what sun already emit, was inside sun. So, then sun was more density what sun it is now. Now that energy making a energyball who have 10 billion lightyears ------ you know what i mean.

That same happend all a time inside atoms nucleus and this is entropy, you already know that and still you believing some magic expanding space?

can you explain for me, why photons, neutriinos and other particle dont emit energy? I think that particle expanding all a time and they emit expanding energy all a time!

 

[Pixie of key]

Thank you!

Welcome to JREF Pixie,

I hope the forum can live up to its name (either way)

I think that you have a lot of better english what i have. Did you already see that Valtaoja väärässä video? If, can you told that idea for other people here with english and then you can asking them, what they think about that very fast moving in space who dont expanding. (Eli voiko näkyvän maailmankaikkeuden energia heidän mielestään liikkua yhdessä hetkessä pois siitä tilasta jossa näkyvän maailmankaikkeuden energia nyt on)? I mean that all atoms born when they already moving that all energy movement very fast far a way from one point who is very far a way outside visible universe!

 

[lionking]

What do you want out of this thread Pixie of key?

 

[Pixie of key]

Want?

What do you want out of this thread Pixie of key?

I just like to found people who like to make new and perhaps right physics with me! That new model need mathematic! Maybe it is a key for understunding cancel and maybe it is a key for could fusion!

 

[Twiler]

How would one go about setting up a scientific experiment to test the validity of this theory?

 

[Ysidro]

tl;dr

 

[Kuko 4000]

If needed, I can act as a translator in this thread.

Toimin mieluusti tulkkina parhaan kykyni mukaan, koitetaan hoitaa asia selkeästi ja ytimekkäästi.

Pixie, I saw the video on YouTube. I think it's better if, instead of overloading the thread with all your ideas at the same time, you would answer the question about your new model of atoms:

Elikkä näin videon, mutta ehkä olisi parempi aloittaa vastaamalla esitettyihin kysymyksiin, ja muutenkin, on selkeämpää jos käsitellään vain yhtä aihetta kerrallaan. Tässä alla se kysymys siitä uudesta atomi-mallista:

Pixie, could you please expand on this idea of a new model of an atom. The general structure and function of the sum of all the parts of an atom is fairly accepted by the masses, and a major deviation from this idea is extraordinary to say the least.

Is there any kind of evidence that you can offer up (in the form of experiments or studies) that could exhibit the forms and functions you speak of?

...and this one:

How would one go about setting up a scientific experiment to test the validity of this theory?

Pixie, let me know if you need any help in translation.

Here's a good online dictionary:

http://www.sanakirja.org/

 

[Cuddles]

All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the pressure.

Pressure isn't force. Not off to a good start here.

I am sorry about my terrible english.

Could you consider apologising for your terrible physics as well?

 

[fuelair]

Are we be troll? We are clearly not sciencey!!

 

[fuelair]

And is "of" supposed to be "off"- which makes more sensical.

 

[sol invictus]

These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.

The people at the center of the sun sweat the most?

 

[Jimbo07]

Are we be troll? We are clearly not sciencey!!

I don't think this is trollish. It is long and involved. I think there are people who geuinely (though perhaps mistakenly) think they can make valuable contributions to theoretical physics by sitting around babbling about it long enough. It's sort of the infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number of typewriters scenario. It may be possible, but it's not very likely...

ETA: for starters

In my opinion the space does not expand or curve.

That's nice.

However, you should first get a Wikipedia-level of understanding regarding The Metric Expansion of Space. Your new theory would have to account both for the theoretical basis and the supporting observed evidence.

 

[Skwinty]

Gee Whiz,
Even null physics sounds better than this.

 

[sol invictus]

Gee Whiz,
Even null physics sounds better than this.

You see how it is? These "theories" are a dime a dozen - these people spam physics departments with them on a regular basis, both in email and print. At first it's entertaining, but after a while you lose patience.

 

[Skwinty]

You see how it is? These "theories" are a dime a dozen - these people spam physics departments with them on a regular basis, both in email and print. At first it's entertaining, but after a while you lose patience.

Yes, point taken. I understand now how this type of twaddle must frustrate people who have devoted years to the study of science.

This is so bad that even I recoil.

 

[kedo1981]

Come back and post here when the "meth" wears off; then tell us if you still believe what you wrote.