• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kamala Harris's False Eulogy of Jimmy Carter

You came up with a nonsense reason for why it might not get AAH'd, rather than acknowledging the very sensible reason why it would not get AAH'd. This after coming up with the nonsense idea that it belonged in AAH in the first place.


What a stupid thing to argue about but go ahead and knock yourself out.


-
 
Last edited:
For those who might be interested, I have created a website that documents Jimmy Carter's real record as president, as opposed to the record that liberals often attribute to him. The site includes numerous links to articles and videos, a list of recommended books, and an introductory essay on Carter's presidential record. The site is titled President Carter's Real Record: The Misunderstood Presidency of Jimmy Carter.

 
I can't help but notice his post is still here, though.
Ah, yes, another fine example of the liberal version of "tolerance and inclusion." If you guys had your way, the only websites, newspapers, and news channels that would be allowed to operate would be liberal ones. You are the very thing that you pretend to oppose.
 
Last edited:
For those who might be interested, I have created a website that documents Jimmy Carter's real record as president, as opposed to the record that liberals often attribute to him. The site includes numerous links to articles and videos, a list of recommended books, and an introductory essay on Carter's presidential record. The site is titled President Carter's Real Record: The Misunderstood Presidency of Jimmy Carter.

Thanks for giving me another URL to not bother with. Like X.com.
 
Ah, yes, another fine example of the liberal version of "tolerance and inclusion." If you guys had your way, the only websites, newspapers, and news channels that would be allowed to operate would be liberal ones. You are the very thing that you pretend to oppose.
I would just like to point out that this little mini-rant, in which Mike complains that liberals aren't really as tolerant or inclusive as they pretend to be, was made in response to a comment that his post was in fact, on a site with a mostly-liberal membership, not excluded- that his post is still there. Another fine example of some conservatives' version of attention to detail.

(Unless his real complaint is that liberal tolerance is not actually tolerance at all unless it's characterized by silence in the face of viewpoints that liberals disagree with? Is that what you think, Mikey? Damn libs should just shut up and roll over? Here's a non-tolerant but entirely inclusive answer from one lib to that sort of idiocy- ◊◊◊◊ you)
 
I would just like to point out that this little mini-rant, in which Mike complains that liberals aren't really as tolerant or inclusive as they pretend to be, was made in response to a comment that his post was in fact, on a site with a mostly-liberal membership, not excluded- that his post is still there. Another fine example of some conservatives' version of attention to detail.

(Unless his real complaint is that liberal tolerance is not actually tolerance at all unless it's characterized by silence in the face of viewpoints that liberals disagree with? Is that what you think, Mikey? Damn libs should just shut up and roll over? Here's a non-tolerant but entirely inclusive answer from one lib to that sort of idiocy- ◊◊◊◊ you)
It's just the usual accusation/confession thing.
 
You wouldn't care to point out a single error in my statements about Carter's record, would you?
You're error is in thinking any of that disqualifies him from being a Democrat. You're pushing childishly simple-minded definitions of "liberal" and "Democrat". Do you seriously expect "real" Democrats to oppose all military spending? We could talk about how often Republicans have cut spending to the Veterans Administration while publicly praising them for their campaigns. And why would anyone think reducing the deficit would be a non-Democratic thing to do? Where's your evidence that zero based budgeting is loathed by liberals?

As I said before, you're defining "liberal" as someone who wants things that they don't really want, just so you can make them cartoon villains, and yourself a righteous hero. It's just a big straw man.
 
For those who might be interested, I have created a website that documents Jimmy Carter's real record as president, as opposed to the record that liberals often attribute to him. The site includes numerous links to articles and videos, a list of recommended books, and an introductory essay on Carter's presidential record. The site is titled President Carter's Real Record: The Misunderstood Presidency of Jimmy Carter.

Nope.
 
Ah, yes, another fine example of the liberal version of "tolerance and inclusion." If you guys had your way, the only websites, newspapers, and news channels that would be allowed to operate would be liberal ones. You are the very thing that you pretend to oppose.
Yeah because that's exactly what Biden would have done if he'd got in in 2020. Freedom of speech sure dodged a bullet there.

Meanwhile, Trump is excluding serious and respected international news agencies because he can't remember that America isn't the whole world and the other 95% of the human race doesn't have to jump when he says "Gulf of America" or whichever dumb caprice comes next.
 
Yes, it's ALL opinion with not one fact to support the idea that Jimmy Carter is evil.

Good luck with that crap.


-

This poster, the OP, didn't offer "opinions".

He offered one incontrovertible fact after another.

You are making a rookie mistake. You are just ignoring facts that don't bolster your opinion. This is confirmation bias. For a so-called "skeptic", it's astonishing how you fail at Logic 101.

Examine your ideas. That's what this forum is for.
 
For those who might be interested, I have created a website that documents Jimmy Carter's real record as president, as opposed to the record that liberals often attribute to him. The site includes numerous links to articles and videos, a list of recommended books, and an introductory essay on Carter's presidential record. The site is titled President Carter's Real Record: The Misunderstood Presidency of Jimmy Carter.


Keep fighting the good fight, sir. I support you 100 percent.

It's refreshing to finally hear someone say the truth.
 
This poster, the OP, didn't offer "opinions".

He offered one incontrovertible fact after another.

You are making a rookie mistake. You are just ignoring facts that don't bolster your opinion. This is confirmation bias. For a so-called "skeptic", it's astonishing how you fail at Logic 101.

Examine your ideas. That's what this forum is for.


Yeah, I read each one, and they were all based on opinions and not one fact.

Maybe you should examine your own ideas.


-
 
Last edited:
This Evil Peanut Man man narrative is getting.... popular... lately, I'm seeing.


Nothing new really. It happens all the time after someone dies.

They get attacked by mean, hateful people using blanket statements, gossip, opinion, innuendoes and lies to bring someone down.

They go, Jimmy did this and this happened, and of course (to those idiots anyway), they assume that one was caused by the other based on their confirmation bias.


-
 

Back
Top Bottom