• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Kamala Harris Election Campaign

You know I have been watching Fox news coverage of Kamala and it really has been more or less fair and balanced. Started with a plain vanilla video about it then went to She's going to give tax breaks to working families Bad Kamala! She's going to have single payer health care. You know that's going to cost 32 trillion. and she is going to do something to shore up social security how dare she! Anyways told my boss and she seemed stuck on equity and equity alone and really didn't get it. She actually blinked when I said tax cuts for working families. She then went on to talk about police brutality. I mentioned another thing that happened in the local news that was wrong that didn't involve police brutality and kind of said that a lot of **** happens in the world and kind of left it at that. Was I wrong to respond to my boss that way do you think?

Now that I think about it maybe Fox News was having me on. Is Kamala really for any of that?
 
Last edited:
Trump didn't chose the person Murdoch picked for him for VP.

Trump was asked who he'd like as a VP candidate, but all he could answer was "man, woman, camera, floor" because that's all that was within his field of view at that moment. Had Ronald McDonald or the dog from Frasier walked in at that moment they'd be on the ticket with him.
 
Unlike Trump who just used songs without permission and even against the instructions of those who held the rights.

If I recall, Trump's choice of song was "It's the end of the world as we know it"

Yes but the skill set is largely the same.
Not at all. A court of law has rules. Trump does not go by the rules.
I'd remind you of the original debate between Biden and Trump in 2020.
Trump kept over talking Biden and when called out on it, he started to whine "he is doing it too" like a 6 year old.

Debating with Trump is not the skillset of an attorney, it's the skillset of a nanny.
 
Oh, man this is a terrific bit:



:)

Didn't I say just the other day that it would be helpful for her to have someone else making that attack? Brilliant!



I can detect a certain theme to some of her campaign attack lines.

[IMGw=640]https://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1447&pictureid=14085[/IMGw]
 
I've seen the first attack ads on Harris. Basically they just called her 'liberal' a whole buncha times and then used some conservative trigger terms like 'defund the police' and such.
 
Unsurprisingly, fact checking Vance's claims on Harris reveal several fails:

In his first two solo rallies as the Republicans’ vice presidential nominee, Sen. JD Vance took aim at Vice President Kamala Harris. But in several instances, Vance twisted Harris’ words or her record.

Vance said Harris “supported abolishing ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement].”

Back in 2018, Harris said elected leaders should “critically reexamine ICE and its role,” but she did not call for abolishing the agency and all its functions.

He said Harris “wanted to defund the police.”

Harris talked repeatedly about “reimagining public safety and how we achieve it,” but she never advocated slashing or cutting police budgets altogether.

Vance said Harris had failed as “America’s border czar,”

but Harris’ role in the Biden administration was to address the “root causes” of immigration in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

Vance said Harris “called Joe Biden a racist and then ran with him two months later.”
During a Democratic primary debate in 2019, Harris criticized Biden’s position on two race-related issues, but she began her comments, “I do not believe you are a racist.”

Vance said that Harris “voted to eliminate the filibuster and pass the green new scam.”
Harris said in 2019 that she was “prepared to get rid of” the procedural rule to pass the so-called “Green New Deal,” but that nonbinding resolution never received a vote.

In back-to-back solo rallies on July 22, Vance spoke in his hometown of Middletown, Ohio, and then in Radford, Virginia. Many of Vance’s attack lines parroted the talking points contained in a National Republican Senatorial Committee memo that paints Harris as “an avowed radical.”
 
I bet her running mate won't have compared her to Hitler
 
Al Gore came out in support of her. Al Gore is the politician who's campaign most resembled Harris's in my mind
 
Harris launches her campaign for President using Beyoncé's song "Freedom" to campaign, with Beyoncé's permission.

https://apnews.com/article/d575644248b9b609aafcd348f39146ef

Launch video (1 min 30 sec):

https://youtu.be/sHky_Xopyrw




The full song:

https://youtu.be/7FWF9375hUA



(Need a dedicated thread for Kamala Harris. Have at it!)

Ironically POTUS is probably the least free person in the world who isn't literally a convicted felon.

Also ironically her biggest claim to qualification for the job has been her previous job of aggressively making people less free. Maybe if she promises to prosecute illegal immigrants the way she prosecuted pot dealers I'll consider voting for her.
 
Ironically POTUS is probably the least free person in the world who isn't literally a convicted felon.

Also ironically her biggest claim to qualification for the job has been her previous job of aggressively making people less free. Maybe if she promises to prosecute illegal immigrants the way she prosecuted pot dealers I'll consider voting for her.

Instead you'll vote for the convicted felon and indicted candidate on 94 counts?
 
Instead you'll vote for the convicted felon and indicted candidate on 94 counts?

And he'll vote for the candidate who is a confirmed sex abuser, pathological lying narcissist who incited an attack on our Capitol because he's such an emotionally damaged baby that he can't accept he lost an election. Yeah...good choice! :rolleyes:
 
Instead you'll vote for the convicted felon and indicted candidate on 94 counts?

I admit it's a tough choice. The career criminal, or the career criminal protected by the political establishment. As long as insider trading is legal for Congress, I make no distinction between Trump and his peers in high elected office in this country.

Also you hate me, and think I'm too stupid to have a vote, and if you had your way I wouldn't. So I feel no special urge to elect your favorite corruptocrat just because they're your favorite.
 

Back
Top Bottom