June Stundie Nominations

[defaultdotxbe]

Don't you hate it when constitutional amendments are snuck through on another bill?

link

the associated rant notwithstanding, it seems the bill is real (something of a surprise to me, usually CTers havent a clue what congress is up to)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.j.res.00005:

 

[Travis]

the associated rant notwithstanding, it seems the bill is real (something of a surprise to me, usually CTers havent a clue what congress is up to)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.j.res.00005:

The conclusion that they reach about this automatically leading to "King Obama" is still very odd. Wouldn't we still have to vote for him every four years?

 

[GlennB]

Oddly enough they often claim its not the lyrics to "Breakfast in America" that is the most disturbing but the lyrics to "The Logical Song" which, if one is of such a bent, seems to be about the 911 TM.

The knowledge runs much deeper than you think.
Put +supertramp +"9/11" into Google and we get this :

http://www.allinlondon.co.uk/directory/1187/91504.php



Note well ... "Women's business clothes". I think we've located where the female Illuminati get togged up.

Follow the link to the street map, and notice the cluster of roads just to the S-W of the shop. Faraday, Newton, Kelvin, Cavendish, Darwin .... all Illuminati members in their time.

And don't even get me started on the road numbers. The shop is at the junction of the A209 and A207. Coincidence? I think not.

 

[NWO Sentryman]

New Nominee

Lennhart on Youtube video 9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible:

I REPEAT: by DEFINITION: only controlled demolitions look like controlled demolitions. WTC 7 looked like a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION becuase it WAS a controlled demolition.

 

[Justin39640]

Lennhart on Youtube video 9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible:

I REPEAT: by DEFINITION: only controlled demolitions look like controlled demolitions. WTC 7 looked like a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION becuase it WAS a controlled demolition.

let me help you out there

I REPEAT: by DEFINITION: only controlled demolitions look like controlled demolitions. WTC 7 looked like a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION becuase it WAS a controlled demolition.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Haven't you noticed that governments set up agencies that operate in secret, sometimes with "black" budgets and that sometimes these agencies become autonomous, developing their own independent sources of funding, unaccountable to anyone but themselves?

Yes! Why haven't we noticed this?!?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

The conclusion that they reach about this automatically leading to "King Obama" is still very odd. Wouldn't we still have to vote for him every four years?

of course, hence my disclaimer about the associated rant

 

[Travis]

Lennhart on Youtube video 9/11 Debunked: Controlled Demolition Not Possible:

I REPEAT: by DEFINITION: only controlled demolitions look like controlled demolitions. WTC 7 looked like a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION becuase it WAS a controlled demolition.

Heh, good one. Welcome to the insanity of the Conspiracy Sub-Forums.

Yes! Why haven't we noticed this?!?

Duh, we're not "ready." Our minds haven't been "awakened" yet.

of course, hence my disclaimer about the associated rant

I think I was saying that more for my own benefit......because it's just so goofy.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Yes! Why haven't we noticed this?!?

You know, this was my first Stundie nomination ever, and Jihad Jane accused me of having a "tragic Stundie nomination addiction".

At least, that's what he inferred. He never actually states anything directly.

 

[Blender Head]

The conclusion that they reach about this automatically leading to "King Obama" is still very odd. Wouldn't we still have to vote for him every four years?

Obviously you've forgotten how elections can be stolen by

 

[1337m4n]

You know, this was my first Stundie nomination ever, and Jihad Jane accused me of having a "tragic Stundie nomination addiction".

At least, that's what he inferred. He never actually states anything directly.

"Jane" is a dude?

 

[aggle-rithm]

"Jane" is a dude?

There's no telling.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

2 posts, separated by less than 3 hours time (bolding mine):

Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

<in the intervening time a long list of engineers that support the conclusions of the NIST report is posted>

Scientific truth is not determined by taking a vote. Fail.

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

2 posts, separated by less than 3 hours time (bolding mine):

Are you a structural engineer? If not, then you are not an expert and your opinion means nothing. If you are, then you are outvoted 29 to 1.

<in the intervening time a long list of engineers that support the conclusions of the NIST report is posted>

Scientific truth is not determined by taking a vote. Fail.

Ahh... doublethink.

[It is unfortunate, however, that some people around here still seem to take what Galileo says seriously. He may actually be a truther, but his posts on this forum are purebred troll.]

 

[Horatius]

I'm not entirely sure what he meant by this, but:

Originally Posted by Unsecured Coins View Post
Oh.... this sounds like... fun....

I had to get a medical checkup today. I'm not due for a physical for another 5 years, but for some reason, had to go get one right away they said. Go now, they said. Pick up your medical records, they say. Head to the medical center. I do, get checked out head to toe. After I pass, they stamp this on my medical records.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...77/Chipped.jpg

I'm getting chipped. I got selected for the 1% of combat troops in my Division to get one to monitor "stress patterns" for the upcoming deployment. I get to go to DACH next week for a simple 30 minute procedure to have this damn chip put in my right arm. So I have a date when it goes in, but no date when it comes out. I don't wanna say that is is for nefarious purposes but I don't see a reason to monitor my stress levels prior to a deployment I'm not going on until another 9-10 months.

Congrats, moon bats. you were right about something for once.

QQ. Paranoid freak.

He's trying to score points off UC for a post that was admitted long ago to be part of a hoax....And somehow, Tippit missed that...?

 

[Mel Odious]

"Shakespeare's" plays = Illuminati handbook

Francis Bacon, a Rosicrucian, wrote the plays, and they were supposed to be a way of describing how the New World (Americas) was gonna be run; by the secret societies.

DI Forums.

 

[Travis]

I'm not entirely sure what he meant by this, but:






He's trying to score points off UC for a post that was admitted long ago to be part of a hoax....And somehow, Tippit missed that...?

We're surprised....why?

"Shakespeare's" plays = Illuminati handbook




DI Forums.

Now there's a whole of assumptionating.

 

[tuc0]

A nice one from the Daily Show website:

06.17.09 at 01:59am | by shaunaci

How is it that the Iran protesters have American Written Words on their signs? I know the CIA is behind this protest. When we protest in America we Americans do not write in Iran words on our protest signs. Something looks fishy Jon....quit watching the ball that the CIA is bouncing Jon. Remember Bush stole the election too. So if an election can be stolen in American then an election can be stolen in Iran. It is not news to the thinkers in the World of Thought. Why do we care who wins the election in Iran when America is borrowing money from China; And America is a economically broke?

Oh, the Irany!

(Screenshot, because that page won't be up forever)

 

[Klimax]

Here are a list of links to useful information.

please read them.

http://www.911myths.com/index.php/Main_Page
http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/
http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notable...aoui/exhibits/
http://wtc.nist.gov/
http://www.9-11commission.gov/

TAM

These are from debunkers, do you have any unbiased sources?

Is anything unbiased?
My nomination of galileo...

 

[IMST]

Over at Rapture Ready (shudder), jb777 is not aware of the fact that Obama's birth records have been produced. S/He assures us:

I'm not a conspiracy theorist or anything like that

Which is a good thing, because otherwise, the rest of this would sound batfeces insane:

but it seems to me that if you are truly an American citizen, all you need to do is show your bona fides and that's it.

My personal guess is that Obama is the public face of a very nasty and harmful (at least to the U.S.) group of people who want to run this country right into the ground. I strongly suspect that people like Soros might be a part of it. I think Obama was picked because he is personable and of course, black. I have no doubt this was all well planned. It doesn't stand to reason that someone who has not had experience running anything, not so much as a lemonade stand, can rise to the U.S. Senate and almost immediately become a rock star. He never paid any dues or did anything that most politicians do before they run for president. I don't think his giving the keynote speech at the Democratic Convention in 2004 was a fluke...it was a coordinated effort to get him on the national stage in a memorable way....and it worked. You cannot get from being a community organizer to president without a lot of money and powerful help. That's just a fact. By all rights, Hillary Clinton should probably have been the nominee but whoever is behind this whole deal knows that the Clintons march to their own drummer and not to anyone else's and therefore she had to lose. I know this sounds strange but it's what I think. Also, I consider it a peculiar point that McCain was ahead in the polls right before the economy tanked. Soros later commented that he had a very good crisis. He made a pile of money off the misery in other words. I think that this whole thing goes a lot deeper than anyone can imagine. But, hiding the birth certificate is weird and one day I guess we'll all find out but not before it's way past too late to do anything about it.

link