July Stundie Nominations


The Almighty designed non-slip banana - surely that is proof of God???

I'll see your banana and raise you a jar of peanut butter!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504&feature=player_detailpage#t=40s

"Chuck Missler takes the misunderstanding of evolution to a whole new level."

Basically he says a sealed jar of peanut butter should develop life if atheists view on life development was correct.:jaw-dropp



p.s. Not a nomination as it is years old.
 
Last edited:
The Almighty designed non-slip banana - surely that is proof of God???

I'll see your banana and raise you a jar of peanut butter!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZFG5PKw504&feature=player_detailpage#t=40s

"Chuck Missler takes the misunderstanding of evolution to a whole new level."

Basically he says a sealed jar of peanut butter should develop life if atheists view on life development was correct.:jaw-dropp



p.s. Not a nomination as it is years old.

Unless someone else nominated it this should be fine.
 
Why is it that when CTers are "just asking questions" they have to be such STUPID questions?

The setup...

tsig said:
DeathDart said:
Two Points

The first that their was not a proper investigation done.

By saying their reasons are unknown I separate my conclusions about their reasons, from the conclusion that the lack of material shows their real intent, vis a vis an investigation.

What God wants, God Gets.
What the management wanted from this cleanup, they got. And they did not put the materials for the investigation very high on their list of priorities.

WTC 7 Is one very big anomaly.

What explanation explains both?


Gravity.


And the Stundie...

DeathDart said:
Why do we investigate plane crashes when nearly all of them are caused by gravity?


http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7360938&postcount=8551

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=7361100&postcount=8557
 
Another one from Keoni Galt:
http://traditionalchristianity.word...a-americas-war-with-the-present/#comment-3896

Patriarchy failed because it was attacked, subverted and undermined deliberately…not because some men abused their women.

FACT: The Rockefeller Foundation funded the development of the Pill. They also funded Albert Kinsey who’s research and report were used to promote the mainstream acceptance of what used to be considered deviant sexual behavior.

Of course, bringing this up usually involves the usual dismissal of “conspiracy theory!” All I can say to that is this: google the Reece Committee report on Tax-Exempt Trust Foundations. It was a congressional investigation on the role the giant “philanthropic” trust foundations have had in funding endowments to promote population control and the eventual “merging” of the US and Soviet Union — the report was made at the height of the cold war…what the committee failed to recognize was that it really is not just about merging the US and USSR, but about merging ALL nations under a single Global Government…the “New World Order.”

Mention the word “NWO” and many people’s brains shut off and their skepticism kicks in.

Folks, it’s a matter of Congressional record.

The Rockefeller, Ford, Carnegie and RAND foundations have invested their tax-exempt fortunes to take over the educational systems (both public Education and college level) to promote liberalism, feminism and collectivism. Social justice. Environmentalism. All of that garbage is nothing more than different angles to destroy the nuclear family, attack Patriarchy and remake society.

The entire goal has always been about population control. To reduce the number of births, the Patriarchal model of family had to be deconstructed.

To the Catholics of this site who would dismiss this as nothing more than “conspiracy theory” I say…watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jABDBjlSzKE&feature=player_embedded

That’s the Catholic Investigative Agency’s Report on The Rockefeller Foundation.

Why did Patriarchy “fail?”

It didn’t. It was subverted.
 
"Chuck Missler takes the misunderstanding of evolution to a whole new level."

Basically he says a sealed jar of peanut butter should develop life if atheists view on life development was correct.:jaw-dropp



p.s. Not a nomination as it is years old.

Hmmm, given enough jars of peanut butter and a few billion years on a planet with liquid water and life could develop from it.
 
OK, this is a bit off the wall, but what the hell. And I should at least have nominated it in February, that being the 10th anniversary of this abortion of reason and logic.

But hey, I'm going to nominate Lord Sutherland, Lord Coulsfield and Lord Maclean, the three judges at Camp Zeist. Specifically for paragraph 35 of their 2001 judgement.

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/library/lockerbie/docs/lockerbiejudgement.pdf It's on page 38 of the pdf.

[35] The evidence in regard to what happened at Frankfurt Airport, although of crucial importance, is only part of the evidence in the case and has to be considered along with all the other evidence before a conclusion can be reached as to where the primary suitcase originated and how it reached PA103. It can, however, be said at this stage that if the Frankfurt evidence is considered entirely by itself and without reference to any other evidence, none of the points made by the defence seems to us to cast doubt on the inference from the documents and other evidence that an unaccompanied bag from KM180 was transferred to and loaded onto PA103A.


Basically they're saying that of course this part of the evidence has to be considered in context before we can decide what it means. Yes of course. But just for a moment, let's not. Hey, if we do that, we can dismiss what the defence has been saying. (Even that isn't true, but leave that aside.) So that's fine, we find that the prosecution's view is the correct one.

But what about the evidence from elsewhere?

paragraph 39 said:
The absence of any explanation of the method by which the primary suitcase might have been placed on board KM180 is a major difficulty for the Crown case,


Yes, the evidence from elsewhere actually showed that what they decided back in paragraph 35 was impossible. They already decided an unaccompanied item of luggage was unloaded from that flight, when deliberately, just for now, not considering that there was far far stronger evidence that no unaccompanied luggage had been loaded on the flight, or carried on it.

Most normal people would look again at the first proposition and realise that the evidence for that was relatively weak, and so that should be the one to go. But normal people don't have spiffy legal training, and that lets them say never mind, we already decided there was an unaccompanied item when the flight was unloaded, so we can just ignore that pesky "evidence from elsewhere" that we deliberately set aside to make the earlier decision in the first place.

I'm not explaining this very well. But it's pretty classic CT thinking.

Rolfe.
 
Another one from Keoni Galt:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/we-cant-all-just-get-along/#comment-5114

Not theory KHELS, conspiracy reality.

Remember folks – our Government knows full well that the worsening economy is going to lead to more violence, mobs and such. This is why we have FEMA camps in all 50 States, and our National Guard and local Police Departments are training on implementing martial law. None of this is theory…but facts.

Alte, I’m in complete agreement with almost everything you wrote here…except this:

“The majority of the people in power and pulling the strings are straight, white, nominal-Christians. ”

Nope. That would be the secular/progressive JOOOOSSSSS.

Isn’t it wonderful how the wealthiest, elite power brokers have inoculated themselves from criticism? To point out that they are secular progressive Jews is to proclaim allegiance to the memory of Hitler!

But really, don’t want to derail the thread regarding the Jooos.

I love the disagreement about who is supposedly behind this conspiracy. "It's straight white sort of Christians." "No, it's the Jews."

I also wonder what the big deal is about FEMA camps being in "all 50 states" is supposed to mean. If Rhode Island didn't have a FEMA camp, would we be ok? For that matter given how small Rhode Island is, why does it need its own FEMA camp?
 
Keoni Galt on how the government isn't monitoring all communication, just storing it for later:
http://traditionalchristianity.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/we-cant-all-just-get-along/#comment-5145

Terri, CSPB…it’s called The 21st Century Panopticon. (I think the term may have come from Alex Jones…not sure though. But once I heard it and researched what the Panopticon was, it makes perfect sense). The DHS has set up “clearinghouses” of data. Massive databases set up all over the country who’s sole purpose is to compile and index all of the data they gather – phone, email, internet comments..whatever.

The point is not that the authorities are monitoring our every communication…there not. What they are doing, is collecting, collating and storing it all, so that IF someone decides you need their attention, they can pull all of that stored data up, have a looksee and decide if any of it will serve their purposes in dealing with you.
 
Can I nominate a court document? From April Gallop's filings with the court.

The plaintiff's desk was about 40 feet from the supposed point of impact, and she is living proof that no 60 or 70 thousand tons of airliner and contents came bursting, ripping, exploding into the space around her, spewing fragments, parts and burning fuel everywhere

I can't imagine why she isn't winning.
 

Back
Top Bottom